Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Latest Corporate Crime News
NEWS
SFO London Mining prosecution collapses; defendants pursue s.19 Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 costs alleging bribery by experts as disclosure issues trigger 20-case review (England and Wales)

According to court filings by Ariel Armon, an acquitted defendant, dated 24 April 2026 and only released on 22 May 2026, an expert witness engaged by the SFO to support its bribery and corruption investigation enlisted a public official to channel improper payments to other officials in order to secure information and materials for the SFO’s inquiry. In February 2026, the SFO halted its case against Graeme Hossie, the former chief executive of London Mining, Rachel Rhodes, its ex-chief financial officer, and Armon, a former consultant. The agency has rejected any suggestion of misconduct. The trio had been charged by the SFO in June 2023 with conspiring to pay bribes to state officials and intermediaries to advance London Mining’s interests in Sierra Leone. Hossie, Rhodes, and Armon were scheduled for trial in April 2026. However, the SFO discontinued the...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Sentencing Council publishes simplified SentencingACE tool to assist Crown Court sentencers in identifying relevant statutory provisions and sentencing guidelines

New tool for sentencers in the Crown Court The Sentencing Council has released a streamlined edition of the SentencingACE tool, created to assist sentencers in the Crown Court in identifying the relevant statutory provisions and sentencing guidelines when passing sentence for an offence. Access the tool here......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK corporate crime weekly: Crime and Policing Act 2026 corporate criminal liability expansion (senior manager test), plus sanctions, POCA, cyber, environmental, health and safety and insolvency enforcement

In this issue: Criminal liability Criminal procedure and evidence Proceeds of crime Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Cybercrime and data protection offences Environmental offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Insolvency offences and Companies Act offences Local authority prosecutions International Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Criminal liability Corporate criminal liability expansion-the Crime and Policing Act 2026 The Crime and Policing Act 2026 (CPA 2026) has now secured Royal Assent, heralding a substantial reset of corporate criminal liability in the UK. By broadening attribution through a widened ‘senior manager’ test, it steps away from the restrictive bounds of the traditional identification principle. From 29 June 2026, corporate criminal exposure will depend not on fixing misconduct to the board or the most senior executives, but on the real-world allocation and exercise of decision-making authority throughout the organisation......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
FCA review of firms’ financial and trade sanctions systems and controls: findings, good and poor practice, common weaknesses, reporting expectations, and MoU with OTSI to enhance co-operation.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released the results of a review evaluating financial services firms’ frameworks and controls relating to financial and trade sanctions. The publication sets out illustrations of effective and weak practice, plus development priorities, to support firms in meeting sanctions legislation. According to FCA, firms have advanced in avoiding sanctions breaches, yet deficiencies persist......

Read More Right Arrow

Sentencing powers—overview

Following conviction, the criminal courts must determine the appropriate sentence to impose on the offender. When sentencing an offender aged 18 or over, the court, by virtue of section 57 of the Sentencing Act 2020 (SA 2020), must consider the following five purposes when imposing sentence:

  • the punishment of offenders
  • the reduction in crime (including its reduction by deterrence)
  • the reform and rehabilitation of offenders
  • the protection of the public (including victims of crime)
  • the making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences

When embarking on the sentencing process, the court should decide which of these purposes it seeks to achieve through the sentence imposed. More than one purpose might be relevant, and the weight to be attached to each must be assessed against the particular offence and the offender’s characteristics when determining sentence. This evaluation is carried out by the sentencing court in every case.

Sentencing procedure


The SA 2020 came into force on 1 December 2020, creating the Sentencing Code. The Sentencing Code is the name given to SA 2020, Parts 2–13, which together comprise the consolidated rules of procedure for the sentencing of criminal offences by the criminal courts in England and Wales...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

View Corporate Crime by content type

Popular documents

Where defendants acknowledge guilt, they can either enter a guilty plea or require the prosecution to prove the case. Pleading guilty may attract a reduction in sentence; see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. That said, the Sentencing Council’s overarching guidelines on reductions for a guilty plea expressly curtail credit where a Newton hearing has occurred and the defendant’s account has been rejected. Those guidelines provide that the reduction otherwise available at the stage the plea was first indicated will generally be cut by half, and, if witnesses are called during the hearing, a further downward adjustment may be appropriate. Practitioners should therefore think carefully about any proposed basis of plea and be alert to the effect an unsuccessful Newton hearing may have on anticipated credit. They should also ensure clients are advised on both issues before a plea is entered, and that a comprehensive note of those discussions is kept. Note that, prior to entering a guilty plea, a defendant may seek an indication of sentence under...

Read More Right Arrow

Time spent on remand When an offender receives a determinate custodial sentence (that is, imprisonment for a fixed term), the period spent on remand in custody that must count towards that term is calculated and applied administratively by the Prison Service. The statutory basis is section 240ZA of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003)... For determinate sentences, the sentencing judge states the overall term, after which the Prison Service works out the credit for time spent on remand in custody; see Practice Note: Custodial sentences available for adult offenders—Determinate sentences of imprisonment. The position differs for time subject to a qualifying curfew and for time in custody pending extradition (see below)... “Remanded in custody” is narrowly defined and applies only where a defendant is: remanded in or committed to custody by order of a court kept in secure accommodation detained in a secure training centre remanded to hospital The Prison Service is responsible for automatically crediting relevant periods of remand in custody towards the sentence...

Read More Right Arrow

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow