Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Latest Dispute Resolution News
NEWS
High Court of England and Wales upholds LCIA award declining jurisdiction; fraudulently backdated LTI not binding; s67 application over USD 1.3 million bonus dismissed

Zalina Kanametova v OSG Records Management [Europe] Limited [2026] EWHC 1196 (Comm) Incentive agreement Judge Neil Cadwallader of the Commercial Court, King’s Bench Division, within the High Court of England and Wales, held that the LCIA arbitrator’s decision was rightly issued on evidence showing the long-term incentive agreement (LTI) said to guarantee a bonus to claimant Zalina Kanametova was not binding because it had been ‘fraudulently backdated’. As a result, the LCIA arbitrator properly determined there was no jurisdiction over Kanametova’s claim for a USD 1.3 million bonus against the respondent, Cyprus-based OSG Records Management (Europe) Ltd. (referred to as OSG). Kanametova served as general director of OSG’s subsidiary, OSG Records Management Centre LLC (referred to as OSG Russia), from 2011–18. She contended that in 2015 she executed the LTI, which included an arbitration clause, and that it was also signed by Krzysztof...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Dispute Resolution Highlights: CPR digital claims, AI research warning, key case law on unfair prejudice, CFAs, costs and service; consultations, Scottish updates and diary dates-28 May 2026

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Costs and funding Litigation Case management Scottish Dispute Resolution New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments CPR updates 195th Practice Direction update expands digital claims process to non-monetary remedies: The Master of the Rolls and the Minister of State for Justice have approved the 195th Practice Direction update, extending the Damages Claim Portal under CPR PD 51ZB so that specified forms of non-monetary relief, described as ‘Other Remedy Claims’, can be filed online alongside a primary damages claim when both sides are represented. The reform also encompasses disputes concerning unfair relationships under the Consumer Credit Act 2006. By transferring matters previously dealt with on paper into a digital pathway, the change is designed to streamline case...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Court of Appeal (England and Wales) upholds inherent jurisdiction to compel further CPR 71 examinations despite departure/resignation-Deutsche Bank v Vik

Deutsche Bank AG v Alexander Vik [2026] EWCA Civ 581 What was the background? In 2013, Deutsche Bank AG secured judgment against Sebastian Holdings Inc (SHI), a company controlled by Mr Alexander Vik, following major trading losses and unmet margin calls. SHI remained liable to the bank for more than US$360 million. In 2015, the Commercial Court, relying on CPR 71.2(1)(b), ordered Mr Vik-then an SHI director-to attend for examination and to provide information and documents concerning SHI’s assets and how the judgment debt might be met. He was personally served within the jurisdiction. Although he later resigned as director and left the jurisdiction, he did attend before Cooke J in December 2015. He was subsequently found to have lied repeatedly during that examination and to have deliberately withheld documents. Deutsche Bank then brought contempt proceedings under CPR 81, which resulted in findings of...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
195th PD Update: DCP to accept digital issuing of ‘Other Remedy’ claims (injunctions, declarations, rescission) and CCA 2006 unfair-relationship claims (England and Wales)

The Master of the Rolls and the Minister of State for Justice have approved the 195th Practice Direction (PD) Update, expanding the reach of the Damages Claim Portal (DCP) in CPR PD 51ZB so that specified non-monetary claims-termed ‘Other Remedy Claims’-can be lodged online alongside a principal damages claim, provided both sides have legal representation, rather than relying on paper filing. It further includes within scope disputes concerning unfair relationships under the Consumer Credit Act 2006, extending the update’s application. This reform shifts matters presently dealt with on paper into a digital workflow to enhance efficiency, aligning connected remedies with the same online route as the main damages claim. The amendments take effect on 27 May 2026. The additional category spans three remedies: injunctions, declarations and rescission. Sources: The 195th Practice Direction Update 195th UPDATE – PRACTICE DIRECTION...

Read More Right Arrow

Statements of case—overview

Statements of case


The statements of case within a claim are the key documents that present each party’s position and allow the court to supervise the proceedings. Statements of case are also known as ‘pleadings’. Which papers amount to ‘statements of case’ is defined in CPR 2.3(1). The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) set out the requirements for what must be included, which in many instances will turn on the nature of the claim and the particular statement of case in question. The required content depends on both the claim’s subject matter and the category of statement filed. A statement of truth must also be included. For guidance on preparing statements of case, see Practice Note: Drafting statements of case. Statements of case must be confirmed by a statement of truth (CPR 22.1(1)(a)). Statements of truth confirm that the signatory honestly believes the accuracy and contents of the document they sign. Each statement must carry a statement of truth in the prescribed form. The CPR prescribe the precise wording to be used, and identify who must sign the statement of truth, including circumstances where a solicitor may sign for their client. Failure to sign the statement of truth may result in the document...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

View Dispute Resolution by content type

Popular documents

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note addresses the correction of accidental slips or omissions in judgments or orders under CPR 40.12, outlining when the rule can, and cannot, be invoked and the approach to making an application. What is the slip rule? The slip rule is the mechanism by which the court may amend an accidental slip or omission in a judgment or order (see CPR 40.12; CPR PD 40B, para 4.1 and CPR PD 40B, para 4.5). CPR 40.12 provides that the court may at any time correct an accidental slip or omission in a judgment or order. The phrase ‘any time’ needs no further gloss or explanation and means exactly what it says: the jurisdiction is not limited to orders that are still in existence (IC v RC—while a family case, it considered an identical provision to CPR 40.12 in the Family Procedure Rules). This jurisdiction is restricted to genuine slips or omissions—the operative word is ‘accidental’—in the text of a sealed court order or a handed-down judgment. It cannot be used to correct substantive errors, for example a mistake of law...

Read More Right Arrow

Drafting a defence under CPR 7 This Practice Note sets out practical direction for preparing a defence to proceedings issued under CPR 7. Read it alongside Practice Note: Drafting statements of case, which outlines general points on statements of case, including format, the requirement for a statement of truth, and electronic filing. It offers hands-on pointers for composing a defence, including how to challenge shortcomings in the particulars of claim and how to plead specific defences such as limitation, contributory negligence, illegality, and failure to mitigate. For the procedural rules governing defences, see Practice Note: Drafting the defence—formalities. This Practice Note addresses only defences to claims under CPR 7. Where a claim proceeds under CPR 8, no defence need be filed (CPR 8.9). For further detail on CPR 8 claims, refer to Practice Note: CPR Part 8 claims (alternative procedure for claims). For guidance on filing, see Practice Note: Filing the defence. For guidance on service, see Practice Note: Serving the defence. For a general model to assist with drafting, consult Precedents: Defence...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note offers direction on interpreting and applying the pertinent provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). Requirements can vary depending on the court in which your case is progressing, so be alert to any extra provisions—for further guidance, see: Court specific guidance. The Note concentrates on preparing the particulars of claim for a claim issued under CPR 7. It should be read together with Practice Note: Drafting statements of case, which supplies general guidance on statements of case, including formatting requirements, the requirement for a statement of truth, and the filing of statements of case. For general information on using CPR 8 (the alternative procedure where there is no substantial dispute of fact), see Practice Note: CPR Part 8 claims (alternative procedure for claims). Particulars of claim—part of claim form or separate document? Where practicable, the particulars of claim should be included within the claim form (CPR PD 16, para 3.1). They may alternatively be provided in a separate document (CPR 7.4(1)). For further information on which claim form to select and its contents, see Practice Note: Claim form—the contents—Which claim form?...

Read More Right Arrow