Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Latest Dispute Resolution News
NEWS
High Court of England and Wales upholds LCIA award declining jurisdiction; fraudulently backdated LTI not binding; s67 application over USD 1.3 million bonus dismissed

Zalina Kanametova v OSG Records Management [Europe] Limited [2026] EWHC 1196 (Comm) Incentive agreement Judge Neil Cadwallader of the Commercial Court, King’s Bench Division, within the High Court of England and Wales, held that the LCIA arbitrator’s decision was rightly issued on evidence showing the long-term incentive agreement (LTI) said to guarantee a bonus to claimant Zalina Kanametova was not binding because it had been ‘fraudulently backdated’. As a result, the LCIA arbitrator properly determined there was no jurisdiction over Kanametova’s claim for a USD 1.3 million bonus against the respondent, Cyprus-based OSG Records Management (Europe) Ltd. (referred to as OSG). Kanametova served as general director of OSG’s subsidiary, OSG Records Management Centre LLC (referred to as OSG Russia), from 2011–18. She contended that in 2015 she executed the LTI, which included an arbitration clause, and that it was also signed by Krzysztof...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Dispute Resolution Highlights: CPR digital claims, AI research warning, key case law on unfair prejudice, CFAs, costs and service; consultations, Scottish updates and diary dates-28 May 2026

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Costs and funding Litigation Case management Scottish Dispute Resolution New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments CPR updates 195th Practice Direction update expands digital claims process to non-monetary remedies: The Master of the Rolls and the Minister of State for Justice have approved the 195th Practice Direction update, extending the Damages Claim Portal under CPR PD 51ZB so that specified forms of non-monetary relief, described as ‘Other Remedy Claims’, can be filed online alongside a primary damages claim when both sides are represented. The reform also encompasses disputes concerning unfair relationships under the Consumer Credit Act 2006. By transferring matters previously dealt with on paper into a digital pathway, the change is designed to streamline case...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Court of Appeal (England and Wales) upholds inherent jurisdiction to compel further CPR 71 examinations despite departure/resignation-Deutsche Bank v Vik

Deutsche Bank AG v Alexander Vik [2026] EWCA Civ 581 What was the background? In 2013, Deutsche Bank AG secured judgment against Sebastian Holdings Inc (SHI), a company controlled by Mr Alexander Vik, following major trading losses and unmet margin calls. SHI remained liable to the bank for more than US$360 million. In 2015, the Commercial Court, relying on CPR 71.2(1)(b), ordered Mr Vik-then an SHI director-to attend for examination and to provide information and documents concerning SHI’s assets and how the judgment debt might be met. He was personally served within the jurisdiction. Although he later resigned as director and left the jurisdiction, he did attend before Cooke J in December 2015. He was subsequently found to have lied repeatedly during that examination and to have deliberately withheld documents. Deutsche Bank then brought contempt proceedings under CPR 81, which resulted in findings of...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
195th PD Update: DCP to accept digital issuing of ‘Other Remedy’ claims (injunctions, declarations, rescission) and CCA 2006 unfair-relationship claims (England and Wales)

The Master of the Rolls and the Minister of State for Justice have approved the 195th Practice Direction (PD) Update, expanding the reach of the Damages Claim Portal (DCP) in CPR PD 51ZB so that specified non-monetary claims-termed ‘Other Remedy Claims’-can be lodged online alongside a principal damages claim, provided both sides have legal representation, rather than relying on paper filing. It further includes within scope disputes concerning unfair relationships under the Consumer Credit Act 2006, extending the update’s application. This reform shifts matters presently dealt with on paper into a digital workflow to enhance efficiency, aligning connected remedies with the same online route as the main damages claim. The amendments take effect on 27 May 2026. The additional category spans three remedies: injunctions, declarations and rescission. Sources: The 195th Practice Direction Update 195th UPDATE – PRACTICE DIRECTION...

Read More Right Arrow

Summary judgment and strike out—overview

Amendments to CPR Part 24 and CPR PD 24-1 October 2023


Practitioners should be aware that, from 1 October 2023, the CPR provisions on summary judgment were revised. CPR Part 24 has been replaced, and CPR PD 24 withdrawn. The revisions aim to streamline the rules and do not make substantive changes to the law or practice. However, some provisions have been renumbered and relocated. Consequently, authorities predating 1 October 2023 cites the former wording and numbering. References in this Overview use the text of CPR Part 24 now in force. For tables mapping the old provisions to their new destinations and the sources of the new provisions, see Practice Note: Summary judgment-CPR Part 24 and CPR PD 24 destination and derivation tables [Archived].

Summary judgment-what is it, who can apply and when?


Summary judgment enables the court to determine a claim or issue without a trial (CPR 24.1). An order may follow a successful application by any party-claimant or defendant, though commonly the claimant-or be made by the court of its own motion...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

View Dispute Resolution by content type

Popular documents

Strike out for abuse of process–basis of application Under CPR 3.4(2)(b), the court has power to strike out a statement of case where it considers the pleading to be an abuse of the court’s process, or where it is otherwise likely to impede the just disposal of the proceedings. It follows that an application to strike out on this basis can properly be advanced by any party against the relevant statement of case, namely: a claimant, in respect of a defence or a counterclaim a defendant, in relation to a claim a third party defendant (Part 20 defendant), concerning a claim brought against it As noted in Practice Note: Strike out—court’s inherent jurisdiction and discretion, the court may equally choose to strike out a statement of case on its own initiative. For comprehensive guidance on the approach to strike out and summary judgment, see: Summary judgment and strike out—overview. Note: there is some overlap between applications to strike out for abuse under CPR 3.4(2)(b) and the doctrine of res judicata, as well as Henderson abuse; see Practice Note: Res judicata and Henderson abuse...

Read More Right Arrow

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow