Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Latest Employment News
NEWS
Stakeholder feedback on removing the unfair dismissal compensation cap: business impacts, high-earning roles, and calls for tribunal guidance and Dispute Resolution System reform under the Employment Rights Act 2025

The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has published a summary of views expressed by stakeholders at roundtables held in January and February 2026 on changes to unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 2025. The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has released an overview of stakeholder opinions gathered during roundtable sessions in January and February 2026 concerning reforms to unfair dismissal provisions within the Employment Rights Act 2025......

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK employment law update: fit note overhaul, WorkWell pilots, fixed-term training EAT ruling, digital right to work policy, EHRC code update, corporate liability expansion, tribunal reform-28 May 2026

In this issue: Horizon scanning Status and worker categories Recruitment Benefits Prohibited conduct Prohibited conduct protection at work Corporate governance Employment Tribunals Dates for your diary Trackers Employment resources on Lexis+® LexTalk®Employment: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Horizon scanning Government announces overhaul of fit note system and publishes call for evidence results The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) have released the findings of a call for evidence on fit notes, and confirmed four pilot projects in parts of England designed to address the ‘broken’ fit note system. Run by the previous government from April to July 2024, the evidence call drew 1,959 responses. It assessed how the current fit note arrangements shape work and health...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
NDAs after the Victims and Courts Act 2026: voiding clauses that restrict disclosures of criminal conduct or responses, interaction with the iniquity rule, and drafting steps for commercial agreements

Section 6 of the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024 supersedes VPA 2024, s 17, scrapping the prior constraint that protected disclosures had to be made to particular recipients for specified purposes. Any term in any agreement, including commercial non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), is void to the extent it seeks to stop a victim, or someone who reasonably believes they are a victim, from revealing relevant criminal conduct-or the counterparty’s reaction to it-to anyone, for any purpose. The new provision binds the Crown, subject only to a tightly drawn national security exception. This analysis examines how these reforms align with existing common law limits on confidentiality and their consequences for standard commercial NDA templates. It is written by Richard Hanstock, a barrister at Cornerstone Barristers and the founder of Deeptech Legal, an SRA-authorised firm specialising in cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, defence technology and national security...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
From directing mind to senior managers: UK corporate criminal liability, enforcement trends and governance imperatives under the Crime and Policing Act 2026

CPA 2026 materially widens corporate criminal exposure by extending attribution for all offences to conduct by ‘senior managers’ exercising significant decision-making power. This moves risk beyond the narrow ‘directing mind’ test and brings companies-particularly large, decentralised groups-under sharper enforcement scrutiny. Expect prosecutors to probe operational leadership, governance gaps and aggregate evidence across individuals. Boards should revisit delegation, clarify accountability and reinforce oversight of operational choices. A continuing hurdle is pinpointing who is a senior manager in complex structures, with courts likely to prioritise substance over form. More broadly, the regime will reshape how organisations record authority, decisions and escalation, with greater emphasis on demonstrating how choices are taken and supervised in practice. A reshaped strategic risk profile The most immediate effect of CPA 2026 is a broader range of situations in which a company can be criminally liable. Historically, attribution turned on the...

Read More Right Arrow

Employment Tribunals—overview

The rules governing how to lodge and defend claims in the employment tribunal, along with their subsequent management and determination, are contained in the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (ET Rules 2024), SI 2024/1155. For the early conciliation regime, see Practice Note: Early conciliation rules (rules applying from Sunday 20 April 2014).

The early conciliation requirement


Acas conciliation entails an impartial Acas officer (a conciliator) discussing the disputed matters with each side to help them better appreciate the other’s stance. The officer seeks to facilitate the parties reaching their own settlement so a tribunal hearing is not required. For general guidance on Acas conciliation, see Practice Note: Acas conciliation.

The early conciliation (EC) requirement (also called mandatory Acas early conciliation) obliges a prospective claimant to give Acas specified information before presenting a claim to the employment tribunal.

The EC requirement applies to ‘relevant proceedings’, that is:

  • those proceedings listed in section 18(1) Employment Tribunals Act 1996, which covers almost all categories of claims within the tribunal’s jurisdiction...
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

View Employment by content type

Popular documents

This Practice Note This Practice Note summarises the employment tribunal’s authority, under Rule 33 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (ET Rules 2024), SI 2024/1155, to compel disclosure of documents and information. It explains the relationship with the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and explores what disclosure and inspection mean and cover, the applicable test for disclosure, the overriding objective and proportionality. It also addresses both standard and specific disclosure, confidentiality, public interest immunity, oppressive disclosure, medical reports, and legal professional privilege (including legal advice privilege, litigation privilege, the iniquity exception and waiver). The Note further reviews procedural requirements such as disclosure statements, pre-action disclosure, and disclosure by non-parties, together with restrictions on the use of disclosed material. It concludes by considering the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the disclosure process. In many employment tribunal cases, documents of differing kinds will comprise a substantial proportion of the evidence. Fair disclosure of such material is required in the interests of justice...

Read More Right Arrow

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow