Legal Guidance and Research / Experts / Douglas Maxwell
Douglas Maxwell#10356

Dr Douglas Maxwell

Dr Douglas Maxwell is Barrister at Henderson Chambers in London. His practice encompasses public law, human rights, commercial litigation, product liability, health and safety, financial services, and all aspects of property law. 

Before joining Chambers, Douglas was awarded a PhD from the University of Cambridge. Douglas obtained multiple academic awards and scholarships, including an HSS Doctoral Scholarship from the University of Cambridge and a Lord Astbury Scholarship from Middle Temple.

His first book, The Human Right to Property: A Practical Approach to Article 1 of Protocol No.1 to the ECHR (Hart Publishing, 2022), was published in July 2022. 

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2021

Experience

  • The Law Commission (2019 - 2020)
  • University of Oxford (2018 - 2019)
  • University of Cambridge (2015 - 2018)

Membership

  • Constitutional & Administrative Bar Association
  • UK Environmental Law Association
  • Property Bar Association
  • Commercial Bar Association

Qualification

  • PhD (2017)

Education

  • Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge (2017)

1 Contributions by Douglas Maxwell

Article 6 ECHR: Engagement, Civil/Criminal Limbs, Access to Court, Fair Trial Elements, Implied Rights, Minimum Criminal Safeguards, Privilege Against Self-incrimination, Limitations, Waiver and Arbitration
PRACTICE NOTES
Article 6 ECHR: Engagement, Civil/Criminal Limbs, Access to Court, Fair Trial Elements, Implied Rights, Minimum Criminal Safeguards, Privilege Against Self-incrimination, Limitations, Waiver and Arbitration
Article 6 Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the ‘ECHR’) provides that: When a person’s civil rights and obligations are being decided, or any criminal charge against them is considered, every person is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by a tribunal established by law that is independent and impartial. Judgment must be given publicly, but the press and public can be excluded from all or part of the hearing in a democratic society in the interests of morals, public order or national security, where the interests of juveniles or safeguarding the parties’ private life so require, or, in the court’s opinion, to the strictly necessary extent in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. Everyone charged with a criminal offence is presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. 3...
Public Law
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.