Jerome Temme#11420

Jerome Temme

Jerome specialises in international arbitration and public international law. He is based in London and has previously spent time in our Paris office and on secondment to a client in the energy sector.

Jerome has experience acting for clients in international disputes under various arbitration rules such as LCIA, ICC, SCC, UNCITRAL and ICSID, as well as in arbitration-related proceedings before the English High Court.

He is qualified as a solicitor in England & Wales and is also a qualified solicitor advocate.

Jerome holds degrees in law and international relations from the University of Oxford and Sciences Po Paris. He speaks German, French and Mandarin.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2018

Qualifications

  • Higher Rights of Audience (Civil), England and Wales (2021)
  • Solicitor, England and Wales (2018)

Education

  • BPP Law School (2016)
  • University of Oxford (2013-2015)
  • National Chengchi University, Republic of China (Taiwan) (2012-2013)
  • Sciences Po Paris, France (2010-2013)

1 Contributions by Jerome Temme

Cybersecurity in international arbitration: threats, AI risks, responsibilities, institutional rules and practical measures for parties, counsel, arbitrators, experts and institutions
PRACTICE NOTES
Cybersecurity in international arbitration: threats, AI risks, responsibilities, institutional rules and practical measures for parties, counsel, arbitrators, experts and institutions
This Practice Note considers cybersecurity in international arbitration. An introduction to cybercrime and cybersecurity in international arbitration A single arbitration may draw in many actors from varied jurisdictions—parties, funders and insurers, arbitrators, counsel, experts, witnesses, the administering arbitral institution or another organising body, plus external service providers—collectively, the ‘Participants’. Within the process, they exchange material that is not publicly available. Unauthorised access could cause commercial harm, sway share prices, reshape corporate strategies or even government policy. The result of a case can reverberate through financial markets; obtaining a draft award before it is issued to the parties could be highly profitable for cyber criminals. Accordingly, the arbitral process is a target for cyber attacks, especially where hackers can locate a weak link in the chain of custody. Because arbitration’s speed and practicality rely on digital information-sharing among multiple parties, institutions and organisations, on diverse platforms and across jurisdictions, cybersecurity is fundamental to arbitration’s continued viability as the preferred mechanism for resolving cross-border disputes. Accordingly, there is an increasing consensus among...
Arbitration
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.