Charlotte Popp , LL.M. (Columbia)
Charlotte is a first-year Associate, advising clients in international arbitration and litigation disputes. Before starting her position, Charlotte gained precious experience in arbitration, especially during her LL.M. programme at Columbia University, where she, among others, worked as Research Assistant to Professor George Bermann. During her 2 year mandatory clerkship, she worked for an arbitration boutique based in Frankfurt.
Practice Area
Panel
- Contributing Author
Qualified Year
- 2025
Membership
- Moot Alumni Association (MAA)
- Deutsch-Amerikanische Juristenvereinigung (DAJV) (network of lawyers practicing in and from the U.S. and Germany)
Qualifications
- Second State Examination (2024)
- New York State Bar Exam (admission pending) (2022)
- Master of Laws (LL.M.) (2022)
- First State Examination (J.D. equivalent) (2020)
Education
- Columbia University (2021-2022)
- University of Münster (2015-2020)
1 Contributions by Charlotte Popp
PRACTICE NOTES
German and EU responses to Russian Article 248 RAPC anti-arbitration injunctions: injunctive, declaratory and damages remedies to safeguard arbitration agreements
This Practice Note explores the growing resort to anti-arbitration injunctions by Russian entities under Article 248.1 of the Russian Arbitration Procedure Code (RAPC), which threatens the enforceability of arbitration agreements with EU-domiciled parties. It sets out how the EU and German legal orders provide effective countermeasures. The EU sanctions framework bars recognition of such injunctions and enables claims for damages, while German law supplies powerful remedies, including injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and recovery of legal costs. Recent German court decisions bolster arbitration rights, showing EU entities can protect their interests without traditional anti-suit injunctions.
Introduction and Background Increased use of Anti-Arbitration Injunctions by Russian entities based on the Russian Arbitration Procedure Code
Recently, Russian entities have increasingly asked local courts to claim exclusive jurisdiction over disputes with EU-domiciled parties, often seeking anti-arbitration injunctions under Article 248.1 RAPC despite valid arbitration agreements. This trend has produced unfavourable outcomes for EU parties, including exposure to substantial fines for non-compliance with such orders and significant economic risks, particularly when award enforcement is pursued in states where the EU party holds assets. The 2020 amendment to the RAPC allows Russian Arbitrazh...
Arbitration
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.
