Tara Panicker#14032

Tara Panicker

Tara Panicker is a newly qualified solicitor with over five years of experience in commercial litigation, international arbitration, and corporate advisory work. She is currently a paralegal in the International Construction team at Howard Kennedy LLP, where she works on high-value disputes arising from complex infrastructure and construction projects across multiple jurisdictions, including proceedings before the LCIA, ICC, SIAC, and the High Courts of England and Wales.
 
Her career includes assisting on a £3 billion asset recovery claim in the English High Court, preparing a £65 million commercial dispute for trial, and supporting a high-profile defamation case before the Court of Appeal. She has also worked on a £6 million fraud and asset recovery claim involving a bitcoin mining scam, and contributed to precedent-setting litigation in the cryptocurrency space.
 
Prior to joining Howard Kennedy, Tara worked at a global dispute resolution practice specialising in litigation and corporate matters, an American multinational law firm focusing on life sciences and healthcare regulation, and a French multinational bank, primarily working on delivering regulatory policies and compliance.
 
As a legal writer, she has authored content for LexisNexis UK on the legal implications of cryptocurrency and maintains a widely used resource on global FIDIC cases. She has also published commentary in the FT Adviser on mortgage prisoner litigation.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2025

Experience

  • Ontier LLP (2022 - 2023)
  • Arnold & Porter (2021 - 2022)
  • Harcus Parker (2021 - 2021)

Qualifications

  • Classics and Persian (Joint Honours) MA (2018)
  • GDL (2019)
  • LPC (2020)
  • SQE (2025)

Education

  • University of St Andrews (2018)
  • BPP Law School (2019)
  • University of Law (2020)

2 Contributions by Tara Panicker

Civil recovery of cryptoassets: challenges, tracing, interim remedies, disclosure, persons unknown and POCA 2002 (England and Wales)
PRACTICE NOTES
Civil recovery of cryptoassets: challenges, tracing, interim remedies, disclosure, persons unknown and POCA 2002 (England and Wales)
Civil recovery of misappropriated cryptoassets This Practice Note outlines avenues to reclaim misappropriated cryptoassets and sets out the legal and technical hurdles arising from the characteristics of such assets and the speed with which fraudsters can deploy obfuscation tools to conceal them. It addresses the roles of following and tracing during recovery, the availability of interim relief in civil proceedings concerning cryptoassets, and the significance of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) to civil recovery in this field. Crypto asset recovery Crypto asset recovery means regaining access to digital property that is lost, stolen, or otherwise unreachable. Situations prompting recovery include lost wallet access, mistaken transactions—for example, assets sent to the wrong wallet address—or fraud. Depending on the facts, potential approaches include: Reconstructing passwords and seed phrases, using brute-force methods or partial backups Conducting blockchain analysis to map transfers and pinpoint destination wallets Using data recovery utilities to extract information from damaged or corrupted devices Pursuing legal remedies, including civil claims and applications for injunctive relief...
Dispute Resolution
Crypto and Digital Assets: UK civil disputes primer on definitions, blockchain mechanics, asset types, exchanges, and emerging FCA/FSMA regulation
PRACTICE NOTES
Crypto and Digital Assets: UK civil disputes primer on definitions, blockchain mechanics, asset types, exchanges, and emerging FCA/FSMA regulation
This Practice Note on crypto and digital assets sets out: the shared features of cryptoassets, their emergence via the Bitcoin White Paper, how cryptography functions, the difference between public and private keys, nodes and mining (including proof of work and proof of stake), an outline of blockchain, categories of digital asset, how crypto exchanges typically operate, and the developing landscape of regulatory duties. It offers a quick-access primer for dispute resolution lawyers dealing with civil disputes concerning crypto and digital assets. For guidance on why cryptoassets matter to dispute resolution lawyers and the kinds of claim that may arise, see Practice Note: Cryptoassets for Dispute Resolution lawyers. Workable definitions of 'digital asset' and 'cryptoasset' The terms 'digital asset' and 'cryptoasset' are frequently used as synonyms. For this Practice Note, which considers digital assets from a legal practitioner's viewpoint, it is essential to adopt a practical understanding of the labels. The Law Commission's Digital Assets: Final report supplies a useful definition of 'digital assets' that underscores the breadth of this asset category...
Dispute Resolution
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.