Chloe Reddock
Chloe is a public law and Court of Protection barrister at Kings Chambers.
She represents ‘P’, local authorities, health trusts, care homes and ICBs in a range of section 21A and section 16 health and welfare proceeding relating to the deprivation of P’s liberty and their care arrangements.
Chloe is developing a broad public law practice. She has advised a client on the public law issues arising from a university’s decision to designate them an international student for the purposes of charging fees, and an NGO on the impact of Higgs v Farmor’s School on strategic litigation relating to the manifestation of a protected belief.
Prior to qualifying, Chloe completed an internship with a capital defense office in Texas, undertook a paid internship with the UK Supreme Court and worked for a Dutch NGO which specialized in anti-discrimination law, and the rights to free expression and association.
Practice Area
Panel
- Contributing Author
Qualified Year
- 2021
Membership
- Advocate
- Women in the Law
- Administrative Law Bar Association
- The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple
Qualifications
- Law and China Studies MA, 2025
- Bar Training Course (Very Competent), 2021
- Human Rights Law LLM (Distinction), 2020
- Law with Spanish LLB (First Class Honours), 2018
Education
- Peking University, 2022 – 2023
- BPP University, 2020 – 2021
- UCL, 2019 – 2020
- University of Granada, 2016 – 2017
- South China University of Technology, 2014 - 2015
- University of Liverpool, 2013 – 2014/ 2015 – 2016/ 2017 – 2018
1 Contributions by Chloe Reddock
PRACTICE NOTES
Judicial review of FCA, FOS and FSCS decisions: principles and leading financial services cases (England and Wales)
What is judicial review?
Judicial review is the mechanism by which the courts in England and Wales scrutinise decisions taken by government ministers and departments, industry regulators, local authorities, and public bodies to check that they have acted lawfully and fairly. When determining whether a given organisation is a ‘public body’ for judicial review purposes, the court looks at the functions it carries out and whether those functions produce public law consequences. The court examines the decision making process used by a public body to decide if the decision was made validly. The court’s power to undertake this review comes from statute, while the governing principles of judicial review stem from case law that develops continually. A court may decline permission to issue a judicial review claim where an alternative remedy has not been pursued. Judicial review remains a measure of last resort in public law matters...
Financial Services
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.
