Legal Guidance and Research / Experts / Elena Safronova
Elena Safronova#14309

Elena Safronova

Elena is a dual-qualified English lawyer and Russian advocate with over 10 years of experience in commercial litigation and white-collar crime defence.
 
Elena advises clients on a broad range of matters, including civil, corporate, and litigation. Her dual qualification allows her to navigate the procedural complexities of both English and Russian jurisdictions.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Experience

  • CIS London & Partners LLP (2022 - Present)

Membership

  • Law Society (2026)

Qualifications

  • Solicitor of England and Wales (2026)
  • Russian advocate (2011)

Education

  • City, University of London: Post Graduate Diploma in Law (PGDL) (2023)
  • Higher School of Economics: Master's Degree in Law of International Trade (2021)

3 Contributions by Elena Safronova

Anti-suit injunctions and arbitral jurisdiction challenges under Russian law: kompetenz-kompetenz, pre- and post-award review, sanctions-driven ‘Lugovoy Law’, court attitudes and enforcement risks for foreign arbitrations
PRACTICE NOTES
Anti-suit injunctions and arbitral jurisdiction challenges under Russian law: kompetenz-kompetenz, pre- and post-award review, sanctions-driven ‘Lugovoy Law’, court attitudes and enforcement risks for foreign arbitrations
This Practice Note explores matters concerning arbitral tribunal jurisdiction under Russian law. Note: the Russian court judgments cited in this Practice Note are not reported by LexisNexis®. Determining tribunal jurisdiction under Russian law Russian law recognises the kompetenz-kompetenz principle, enabling arbitral tribunals to decide for themselves whether they have authority to hear a dispute. This principle is reflected in paragraph 1 of Article 16 of the Law of 7 July 1993 No. 5338-I On International Commercial Arbitration (as amended) (the Law on ICA), which, in translation, states that an arbitral tribunal may determine its own jurisdiction and address objections regarding the existence or validity of an arbitration agreement, and that an arbitration clause within a contract is to be treated as an independent provision...
Arbitration
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Russia: Procedure, Refusal Grounds, Public Policy, Sanctions and Arbitrability
PRACTICE NOTES
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Russia: Procedure, Refusal Grounds, Public Policy, Sanctions and Arbitrability
Regulation of the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in Russia In the Russian Federation, enforcement of international arbitral awards is regulated by both domestic and international norms. Russia has signed and ratified the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, the 1961 European (Geneva) Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, and other international conventions, for example the ‘Convention on the Settlement by Arbitration of Civil Disputes Arising from Relations of Economic and Scientific-Technical Cooperation’ (concluded in Moscow on 26.05.1972), as well as a range of bilateral treaties on legal co-operation that, inter alia, support recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards; however, the Russian Supreme Court has stated that the Kyiv Convention on Settling Disputes Related to Commercial Activities (1992) and the Minsk Convention on Legal Aid and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Cases (1993) do not extend to disputes over the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in Russia. Russia has also adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985) and, relying on it (as revised in 2006), enacted Law No. 5338-1 ‘On International Commercial Arbitration’ dated 7 July 1993 (the Law on ICA). The procedure...
Arbitration
Russia: arbitral interim measures—state court support, recognition and enforcement practice, key cases, and proposed APC/CPC reforms
PRACTICE NOTES
Russia: arbitral interim measures—state court support, recognition and enforcement practice, key cases, and proposed APC/CPC reforms
—the legal framework The applicable rules depend on the dispute type and/or the parties’ legal status: either the Arbitrazh (Commercial) Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (APC) or the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (CPC) will apply. Under paragraph 1 of Article 241 APC, decisions of foreign courts and arbitral tribunals are recognised and enforced within the Russian Federation where such recognition and enforcement are provided by international treaties and federal laws. Chapter 45 of the CPC sets out equivalent provisions. As a party to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958, Russia assures recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards domestically in accordance with the binding rules of the Law of the Russian Federation On International Commercial Arbitration No. 5338-1 of 7 July 1993 (the Law on ICA). Article 17 of the Law on ICA provides that interim measures ordered by an arbitral tribunal are binding on the parties to the arbitration. However, unlike the latest version of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the Model Law), the Law on ICA contains no provisions...
Arbitration
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.