Julia Marlow

Julia advises on the interface between business and government. She works with clients on both sides of that interface, on the development and implementation of new government policies, legislation and regulation, and on judicial review challenges. Julia's clients operate in a range of industries, including energy, financial services, pharmaceuticals, telecoms and transport.

Whether she is assisting clients in shaping policy or regulations that affect their business, or is advising public bodies on sound decision-making, Julia's goal is to achieve her client's objectives without having to go to court wherever possible. While judicial review can be a useful tool for making sure that all relevant matters are taken into account when government bodies are developing new policy or law, it can be expensive and time-consuming. However, litigation can often be avoided if businesses and government communicate constructively at the earliest possible stage in the decision-making process, when policies are still being formulated and the possible impact of a decision is still being assessed. However, when litigation is the best available means to achieve a client's aims, Julia – who is a qualified solicitor advocate – is able to draw on her experience of acting for clients in high-profile and complex judicial review challenges.

While at Hogan Lovells, Julia went on secondment to Ofgem's legal team, the UK energy regulator. While there she advised Ofgem on the implementation of a new Government scheme to encourage the use of renewable energy, working closely alongside the legal team in the Department of Energy and Climate Change.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2009

Membership

  • Member, Administrative Law Bar Association
  • Committee Member, Young Public Lawyers' Group

Qualifications

  • Higher Rights of Audience
  • Diploma in Law (Distinction), BPP
  • Legal Practice Course (Distinction), BPP

Education

  • BA Modern History (1st Class) University of Oxford

1 Contributions by Julia Marlow

Judicial review: interested parties and interveners—status, joinder, Supreme Court practice and costs (England and Wales)
PRACTICE NOTES
Judicial review: interested parties and interveners—status, joinder, Supreme Court practice and costs (England and Wales)
Interested parties In the context of judicial review, an interested party refers to any person—other than the claimant and defendant—who is directly affected by the claim. Where a judicial review claim is connected to proceedings in a court or a tribunal, every other party to those proceedings will qualify as an interested party in the review; eg if a defendant in a criminal case in the Magistrates or Crown Court brings a judicial review of a decision in that case, the prosecution must always be named as an interested party in the judicial review claim. A person is regarded as directly affected if they are affected without the intervention of any intermediate agency, that is, without the involvement of any intervening body. For example, in R v Rent Officer Service, ex parte Muldoon, a local housing authority’s decision not to pay a housing benefit was challenged. The Secretary of State was indirectly affected, because if the decision were quashed, the disputed benefit would be added to the subsidy paid to the local authority...
Public Law
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.