Nick Nason

Nick is founder and principal lawyer at Edgewater Legal , a firm specialising in immigration solutions for individuals and small companies.

Prior to this Nick was a solicitor and in-house advocate at Luqmani Thompson & Partners (2010-2015), and before this a volunteer at Bail for Immigration Detainees (2009-2010).

In 2016, Nick took a sabbatical and spent time volunteering with the Refugee Legal Aid Program at St. Andrew's Refugee Services (StARS) in Cairo, assisting individuals making initial asylum applications to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

Nick regularly writes about immigration law and policy issues for Free Movement , and was funded by the Strategic Legal Fund to provide an analysis of the legality of Operation Nexus , a collaboration between the police and immigration officials aimed at increasing the number of individuals deported from the UK.

Practice Area

Panels

  • Contributing Author
  • Q&A Panel

6 Contributions by Nick Nason

MAC 2018 EEA migration: key findings and post-Brexit UK work immigration recommendations (Tier 2 expansion, £30k salary, RLMT/cap abolition, no low-skilled route, SAWS)
PRACTICE NOTES
MAC 2018 EEA migration: key findings and post-Brexit UK work immigration recommendations (Tier 2 expansion, £30k salary, RLMT/cap abolition, no low-skilled route, SAWS)
The UK’s choice to exit the European Union has made a comprehensive reassessment of the country’s immigration framework necessary. On 18 September 2018, the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) released its final report on European Economic Area (EEA) migration in the UK, designed to provide an evidence base for shaping a new migration system to operate after the end of the implementation period from 1 January 2021. The report sets out multiple conclusions on the effects of EEA migration to the UK, together with a series of proposals which, if taken forward, would have a significant bearing on the way EEA nationals are permitted to participate in the UK labour market once Brexit has taken effect. However, the document does not tackle whether EEA nationals ought to be treated differently within the family migration system, observing only that there could be large effects which should be taken into account. The key findings The report considered a vast body of evidence on the impact of migration from the EEA on the UK...
Immigration
UK Deportation Law: automatic and conducive deportation, Article 8 framework, statutory exceptions, revocation, leave outcomes, and treatment of EEA, Irish, Commonwealth, refugees and family members
PRACTICE NOTES
UK Deportation Law: automatic and conducive deportation, Article 8 framework, statutory exceptions, revocation, leave outcomes, and treatment of EEA, Irish, Commonwealth, refugees and family members
The process permits the removal of a non‑British citizen from the UK and prevents their lawful return. Authority to deport is contained in sections 3 and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 (IA 1971) and sections 22–35 of the UK Borders Act 2007 (UKBA 2007). These provisions provide the legal framework for such action. A deportation order has several consequences: it compels the person to leave the UK it automatically cancels any leave to enter or remain—whether granted before the order is made or while it stays in force it bars the person from re‑entering the UK unless, and until, the order is revoked The deportation process must be distinguished from administrative removal (see Practice Note: Administrative removal). Some deportation decisions give rise to a right of appeal. In other instances, the sole legal challenge may be by way of judicial review. For further details see: Rights of appeal and Judicial review—overview. Knowingly entering the UK in breach of a deportation order constitutes a criminal offence. What are the circumstances which may trigger a decision to deport? A deportation order may be issued by the Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD), acting through the Home Office, in the...
Immigration
UK post-Brexit immigration White Paper 2018: ending free movement, Tier 2 overhaul, salary threshold consultation, short-term routes, ETA, digitisation and implementation to 2021
PRACTICE NOTES
UK post-Brexit immigration White Paper 2018: ending free movement, Tier 2 overhaul, salary threshold consultation, short-term routes, ETA, digitisation and implementation to 2021
The UK’s future skills-based immigration system A government white paper, ‘The UK’s future skills-based immigration system’, setting out plans for how the UK’s immigration regime will look after Brexit, was issued on 19 December 2018. The most notable reform proposed is the conclusion of Free Movement for EU citizens. From 31 December 2020 (the end of the implementation period), one set of UK immigration rules will apply to migrants from both the EU and outside the EU. The paper also proposes substantial changes to sponsoring skilled workers under Tier 2 of the Points-Based System, including: removing the overall annual cap on sponsored work visas reducing the skill level for sponsorship from RQF Level 6 to RQF Level 3 abolishing the Resident Labour Market Test cutting red tape for sponsoring employers A broader package of proposals includes: a new, temporary short-term worker route more generous post-study leave for students once their courses finish simplifying rules to clarify which short-term business activities a visitor may carry out It also...
Immigration
Windrush Scheme (UK): eligibility, routes to citizenship or settlement, evidential approach, challenging refusals, and compensation scheme updates
PRACTICE NOTES
Windrush Scheme (UK): eligibility, routes to citizenship or settlement, evidential approach, challenging refusals, and compensation scheme updates
Windrush Scheme On 16 April 2018, after a number of high profile widely reported cases involving long-settled Commonwealth migrants struggling to prove their lawful right to live in the UK, the government created a taskforce for this cohort. The Home Office urged long-term Commonwealth citizen migrants, unable to evidence their right to remain, to contact the Windrush Taskforce (now the Windrush Help Team) by telephone or email to review their situation and discuss their position, as appropriate to their circumstances. At first, eligible people using the service had matters concluded on an ad hoc basis, without lodging a formal application. This approach evolved into a structured route with the introduction of the Windrush Scheme (the ‘Scheme’) on 30 May 2018. Notably, while the Scheme mainly targets specified ‘Commonwealth citizens’, its scope reaches beyond Commonwealth citizens and their children, and also covers individuals of any nationality who arrived in the UK before 31 December 1988 and have lived here since. The Scheme codifies and broadens the support originally offered by the Taskforce, helping those within its scope to obtain formal proof of their immigration status in the UK, and to formally evidence their position where required, through a clear, official process...
Immigration
RLMT: If salary range added, must the 28‑day job advert restart?
Q&As
RLMT: If salary range added, must the 28‑day job advert restart?
Resident Labour Market Test (RLMT) When placing a vacancy under the resident labour market test (RLMT), a sponsor must retain a screenshot of the website taken on the day the advert first goes live, unless the advert itself shows the date it was posted, in which case the screenshot can be produced at any point while the listing remains valid. See Practice Note: Resident Labour Market Test. If the wording of the advert is altered, the screenshot held by the sponsor to meet the above requirement will not match the actual particulars of the role (including the remuneration package). This inconsistency could lead, on audit, to a finding that the RLMT process was not followed. To minimise the risk of non-compliance on this matter, it is advisable to repost the advert, capture the requisite screenshots on the first day it appears as required by the RLMT, and refrain from changing the advert’s contents throughout the minimum 28-day period...
Immigration
UK departure before biometrics: section 3C leave, invalidity risk
Q&As
UK departure before biometrics: section 3C leave, invalidity risk
section 3C leave This answer proceeds on the basis that no request was submitted to the Home Office to cancel the application, nor to retrieve the passport prior to departing the UK. If someone makes an application from within the UK to extend their permission to stay before their existing leave runs out using the online route, the date on which the application is treated as lodged is the date the online form is submitted, not the enrolment of biometrics. When someone who already has leave to remain applies from inside the UK to extend it, their current leave, together with all attached conditions, continues automatically so long as a valid application is made before that leave expires (known as ‘section 3C leave’)...
Immigration
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.