Nigel Sanders

Nigel leads Walkers' Channel Islands Insolvency and Dispute Resolution practice. He has a very broad based commercial litigation and arbitration practice and is experienced in handling local and multi-jurisdictional contentious matters arising in a wide range of areas. These typically involve helping clients in the financial services sector on matters involving trusts and probate, funds and company disputes as well as on fraud and asset tracking and insolvency. Nigel also advises on regulatory matters. He works closely with the firm's Private Capital and Trusts and Regulatory practice groups. Nigel has represented clients in a number of reported cases including: EVIC v Greater Deep Value Fund II Limited [2012] (just and equitable winding up of a Jersey fund); Re PW Trust [2010] (threatened proprietary claims against a trustee); Representation of Kentz Corporation [2014] (members scheme of arrangement); CPA v Keogh and St Paer [2015] (non-compete covenants in employment contracts); Biema Holdings Ltd & Ors v SG Hamrbos [2017] (breach of mandate claim connected to foreign criminal proceedings); RTI Limited v Mykolayiv Customs Office [2018] (letter of request from foreign court); ATF Overseas Holdings Limited v JCRA (appeal of competition law regulatory decision). Nigel has also appeared in a wide range of reported trust law decisions in Jersey. Nigel originally qualified as an English solicitor and worked for Macfarlanes prior to moving to Walkers in the Cayman Islands where he practised as an Attorney at Law between 2003 and 2006 . Nigel moved to Jersey in 2006 and rejoined Walkers as a partner in Jersey in 2019, having been a partner at another offshore firm in the intervening years. He qualified as an Advocate of the Royal Court of Jersey in July 2009. He is also admitted in the British Virgin Islands.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 1991

Membership

  • Jersey Law Society (Committee member)
  • Law Society of England and Wales
  • INSOL

Education

  • The University of Hull, LLB Law
  • The Nottingham Trent University, LLM, Advanced Litigation

1 Contributions by Nigel Sanders

Foreign judgment recognition and enforcement in Jersey: reciprocal registration (UK, Isle of Man, Guernsey, Israel) and common law routes, procedure, defences, limitation, service, interest and costs, and enforcement methods
PRACTICE NOTES
Foreign judgment recognition and enforcement in Jersey: reciprocal registration (UK, Isle of Man, Guernsey, Israel) and common law routes, procedure, defences, limitation, service, interest and costs, and enforcement methods
This Practice Note offers an overview of enforcement in Jersey, spanning subjects such as inconsistent decisions, costs, currency, the enforcement pathway, limitation, injunctive measures, recognition of judgments, service, pitfalls and the varieties of enforceable order. Although it refers to decisions of the Jersey courts, these are not reported by LexisNexis®, and therefore links to the judgments are not provided. Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) (Jersey) Law 1960 — the 1960 Law Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1973 — the 1973 Act Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Rules 1961 — the Rules Questions and answers 1. Treaties—is your country party to any bilateral or multilateral treaties for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments? What is the country's approach to entering into these treaties and what, if any, amendments or reservations has your country made to such treaties? Jersey, as a British Crown Dependency with its own government, legal system and legislation, is not part of the UK or the EU, and is not a signatory to the Brussels or Lugano Conventions. Jersey does, however, maintain statutory reciprocal arrangements for the recognition and enforcement of judgments from the superior courts of England and Wales, Scotland...
Dispute Resolution
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.