Joachim Knoll

Joachim Knoll is a partner at LALIVE and has been practicing international arbitration, both commercial and investment treaty arbitration, since 1999. He has acted as counsel and arbitrator in over 70 international arbitral proceedings, ad hoc (including UNCITRAL) or administered (ICC, ICSID, Swiss Rules, LCIA, SCC, DIS, DIAC, AAA/ICDR), governed by various procedural and substantive laws, including Swiss, French, German, English, New York and Turkish. Joachim Knoll is experienced in disputes involving the main aspects of commercial transactions, in particular disputes relating to the international sale of goods, distribution and investment disputes in the construction, energy, mining, telecommunications, broadcasting and aviation sectors.

He also advises clients on arbitration-related matters including drafting of arbitration agreements, challenges and enforcement of arbitral awards. In addition, he provides advice to governments in the negotiation of investment treaties, as well as to investors on how to structure their investments to ensure effective investment protection.

Joachim Knoll has been designated to serve on ICSID's Panel of Conciliators by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany (until 2026). He is a former member of the Arbitration Court of the Swiss Chambers' Arbitration Institution which administers arbitrations subject to the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration, and he acted as co-chair of ASA below 40 (Swiss Arbitration Association) from 2010 to 2012. He is head lecturer and a member of the academic council of the Swiss Arbitration Academy. Before joining LALIVE in 2006, Joachim Knoll has practiced arbitration in France with Shearman & Sterling in Paris (1999- 2006). 

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2004

Membership

  • Association of International Business Lawyers (AIBL)
  • German Arbitration Institution (DIS)
  • Swiss Arbitration Association (ASA)

Education

  • King's College London
  • Boston University
  • Universities of Hamburg and Cologne
  • University of Aix-Marseille III

1 Contributions by Joachim Knoll

Non-pecuniary remedies in international arbitration: tribunal powers, applicable law, principal remedies (performance, declarations, formative relief, restitution, injunctions and astreintes) and practical guidance on enforcement and drafting
PRACTICE NOTES
Non-pecuniary remedies in international arbitration: tribunal powers, applicable law, principal remedies (performance, declarations, formative relief, restitution, injunctions and astreintes) and practical guidance on enforcement and drafting
Practice Note International arbitration is still commonly regarded as a forum where parties pursue financial relief, chiefly damages for breaches of contract. Nonetheless, non-pecuniary remedies—long eclipsed by headline-grabbing damages awards from certain tribunals—have been available in at least some legal systems and have drawn growing interest in recent years (Charles H. Brower, Neglected, Perplexing, Unpredictable: Remedies in International Commercial Arbitration, 102 Nebraska Law Review [2024], 490–493). This Practice Note examines the jurisdiction and authority of arbitrators to grant non-pecuniary relief and outlines the principal forms such relief may take. It also touches on issues explored in depth in a 2011 study prepared for the ASA conference ‘Performance as a Remedy—Non-Monetary Relief in International Arbitration’ (Performance as a Remedy: Non-Monetary Relief in International Arbitration (2011), Michael E. Schneider and Joachim Knoll (eds.)), which is cited throughout this Practice Note. The authors express their gratitude to Mr Robert Bradshaw, Partner, and Ms Margaux Bergère, Associate in LALIVE’s Arbitration Practice Group, for their valuable support in researching this Practice Note. For an introduction to recovering damages in international arbitration, see Practice Note: Damages in international arbitration...
Arbitration
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.