PRACTICE NOTES
Entire agreement and non-reliance clauses: interpretation, implied terms, misrepresentation, contractual/evidential estoppel, fraud, remedy limitations and statutory controls, and relationship with exclusion clauses
Parties often wish to stipulate that the entirety of their contractual relationship is governed by the written agreement they have signed. This is known as an ‘entire agreement clause’. This Practice Note examines why such clauses are used and the principal issues relevant to their operation, including the interplay between entire agreement clauses and implied terms, misrepresentation, fraud and exclusion clauses, non-reliance statements, and broader matters of evidential estoppel and contractual estoppel. For further guidance on construing the scope of parties’ contractual obligations, see Practice Notes:
The parol evidence rule in interpreting contracts
Contract interpretation—admissibility of surrounding documents and related content
What is an entire agreement clause?
At its simplest, an entire agreement clause provides that the whole of the parties’ contractual dealings is governed exclusively by the terms contained in their written contract. Consequently, when interpreting the contract, the court is restricted to the 'four corners of the agreement', and pre-contractual communications between the parties are immaterial to that exercise, cannot be considered by the court, and cannot give rise to liability...
Dispute Resolution