Verity Quaite

Verity is employed part-time as a Senior Associate in the Commercial Crime team at Fieldfisher and accepts instructions in a self-employed capacity through 18 St John Street Chambers.
 
Verity has experience of prosecuting and defending in the criminal courts. She has been instructed by the CPS, HMRC and the Insolvency Service and has prosecuted companies and directors for offences under the Companies Act 2006. She has significant experience acting in confiscation proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, acting for both prosecution and defence and has represented individuals suspected of fraud in interview and in court.
 
In addition to her experience as an advocate, Verity has advised companies in relation to potential defences under the Bribery Act 2010 and has worked in multi-disciplinary teams conducting cross-border corporate investigations for companies under active investigation by the SFO. She spent time in-house on secondment to the Ethics & Compliance department of a well-known listed multi-national corporation, where she conducted internal investigations across the Middle East and Africa region into a broad spectrum of wrongdoing, from discrimination and harassment, through to theft, fraud and bribery. She is part of the team that represented ENRC during investigation by the SFO, which resulted in the closure of the case without charge following a ten year investigation.  

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2019

Experience

  • Fieldfisher LLP (Jan 2022 - Present)
  • 18 St John Street Chambers (Sep 2018 - Present)
  • Slaughter and May (Paralegal) (Jul 2017 - Jun 2018)
  • Fulcrum Chambers (Paralegal) (Apr 2015 - Apr 2016)

Membership

  • Lincolns Inn
  • Northern Circuit
  • Female Fraud Forum

Qualifications

  • BPTC (2017)
  • GDL (2014)
  • MA Music, Culture and Politics (2012)
  • BA Music (2011)

Education

  • BPP Law School (2017)
  • BPP Law School (2014)
  • Cardiff University (2012)

1 Contributions by Verity Quaite

Defence guide to responding to a prosecutor’s POCA 2002 section 16 confiscation statement and preparing a section 17 response (England and Wales)
PRACTICE NOTES
Defence guide to responding to a prosecutor’s POCA 2002 section 16 confiscation statement and preparing a section 17 response (England and Wales)
Confiscation statement under POCA 2002 Typically, the defence will already have lodged a statement of means under section 18 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) before the prosecutor serves a Statement of Information under POCA 2002, s 16 (commonly called a section 16 statement). See: Confiscation timetable—checklist. The defence then has the chance to answer the section 16 statement pursuant to POCA 2002, s 17. That reply is intended to focus and reduce the matters to be determined at the confiscation hearing. If the defence does not make clear whether it contests any assertions advanced by the prosecution in its section 16 statement, the court may treat that silence as acceptance of those particular points. Accordingly, the section 16 statement must be reviewed with care and every area of disagreement should be identified within the defence response. It is also essential to agree a realistic timetable for supplying the defendant's response to the prosecutor's section 16 statement. In many instances, it is possible at an early stage to pinpoint those cases where significant work will be necessary before a response can be filed. For those matters, the need for extra preparation will be evident in advance accordingly...
Corporate Crime
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.