Karen Cooper#997

Karen Cooper

Karen is an experienced employee benefits lawyer with more than 20 years’ experience in advising companies of all sizes in relation to their employee benefit and remuneration issues. She trained and worked for leading law firms Baker McKenzie LLP and Linklaters LLP and spent three years as a remuneration consultant at Ernst & Young LLP. Prior to co-founding Cooper Cavendish, Karen headed up Osborne Clarke LLP's employee benefit practice for 15 years.

Karen is a thought-leader and regularly speaks and presents at industry conferences and events. She is a member of the Small Quoted Companies Alliance Share Scheme Committee and the Share Plan Lawyers Organisation.

Karen is also the author of a wide range of legal publications including the chapter on executive remuneration in Sweet & Maxwell’s ‘Corporate Governance’, the chapter on employee share schemes in Jordan’s Company Administration and she contributes regularly to Tax Journal. She is ranked as a leading individual on employees share schemes in Chambers and Partners and was recognised in the 2015 International Tax Review Women in Tax Leaders (a comprehensive guide to the world’s leading female tax advisers).

Practice Areas

Panels

  • Consulting Editorial Board
  • Contributing Author

8 Contributions by Karen Cooper

AIM company share schemes: UK regulatory, corporate governance, valuation, disclosure and tax issues
PRACTICE NOTES
AIM company share schemes: UK regulatory, corporate governance, valuation, disclosure and tax issues
This Practice Note explores the range of issues that arise for companies admitted to trading on AIM when creating and running employee and executive share plans. It highlights the principal regulatory and corporate governance points to keep in view, together with some tax considerations for the company and scheme participants. Regulatory issues Introduction Compared with companies listed in the equity shares (commercial companies) category of the London Stock Exchange, AIM-traded companies usually face less onerous corporate governance obligations. Although AIM issuers must still comply with the Market Abuse Regulation, they are not required to adhere to the UK Corporate Governance Code, nor to the remuneration policy and reporting regime that applies to companies listed in the commercial companies category. AIM companies are not obliged to produce an annual directors’ remuneration report, and are not required to put a remuneration policy or report to a shareholder vote. Nonetheless, a number of corporate governance guidelines are applicable to AIM companies and are relevant to the establishment, operation and oversight of employee share schemes. Boards should therefore factor these expectations into scheme design and ongoing administration and disclosure. These include: the AIM Rules for Companies (the AIM Rules) the QCA Corporate Governance Code (2023) ...
Share Incentives
Death of employee option holders and shareholders: UK market practice, HMRC CSOP, EMI, SAYE and SIP requirements, tax treatment and practical issues
PRACTICE NOTES
Death of employee option holders and shareholders: UK market practice, HMRC CSOP, EMI, SAYE and SIP requirements, tax treatment and practical issues
Employee share scheme participants and shareholders This Practice Note considers the matters that arise on the death of a participant in both HMRC tax-advantaged schemes and a range of unapproved share scheme arrangements. It also examines the practical points connected with the death of an employee shareholder who may have obtained shares under those arrangements. Market practice Early Vesting As a matter of market practice, in most employee share plans, death is ordinarily treated as a 'good leaver' event (see Practice Note: Drafting leaver provisions in share plans—Different treatment for different types of leavers). This typically results in accelerated vesting or the ability to exercise awards being triggered. Where that applies, and the relevant scheme is an option plan, the deceased participant’s personal representatives are permitted to exercise options within a defined window (commonly 12 months after death). Likewise, options already vested will generally have to be exercised within a specified timeframe from the date of death, failing which they will lapse and cannot be exercised thereafter. For many schemes, the exercise window is 12 months from death, as this meets the legislative conditions for tax-advantaged schemes (see: HMRC tax-advantaged schemes below), in accordance with that legislation and requirements. It...
Share Incentives
Disposals to Employee Ownership Trusts: UK legal, tax and transactional guidance on structure, funding, valuation, governance, risks, HMRC clearances and disqualifying events, including changes in Finance Acts 2025 and 2026.
PRACTICE NOTES
Disposals to Employee Ownership Trusts: UK legal, tax and transactional guidance on structure, funding, valuation, governance, risks, HMRC clearances and disqualifying events, including changes in Finance Acts 2025 and 2026.
What is an employee ownership trust An employee ownership trust (EOT) is a distinct form of employee benefit trust (EBT) that must satisfy defined statutory conditions. EOTs were brought in by the Finance Act 2014, alongside particular tax advantages made available both to companies owned by an EOT and to individuals who transfer shares to an EOT. Where the strict legal requirements are not met in relation to the EOT, those tax reliefs will not apply. These statutory thresholds and conditions are central to qualification for any associated tax reliefs available under EOTs. For more information on EOTs and the legislative tests they are required to meet, see Practice Note: Employee ownership trusts. For guidance on pitfalls and frequent errors to watch for when establishing and running an EOT, see Practice Note: Pitfalls of setting up and operating an employee-ownership trust. EOTs can provide a robust route for succession planning and a substitute for more conventional exit options, including a third-party trade sale, or a management or private equity-backed buy-out. However, although the potential tax reliefs available to individuals who dispose of a controlling interest to an EOT can be highly attractive, moving to an EOT structure can be a...
Share Incentives
EBTs in UK private company sales: due diligence, award vesting, share transfers, PAYE/NICs, CGT/CT relief, stamp duty, trustee issues and wind-up
PRACTICE NOTES
EBTs in UK private company sales: due diligence, award vesting, share transfers, PAYE/NICs, CGT/CT relief, stamp duty, trustee issues and wind-up
Employee benefit trusts (EBTs) are a form of discretionary trust created primarily to allow companies to deliver shares, cash or other rewards to employees within the workforce. They are frequently used to underpin employee share plans and to promote broader employee share ownership. For broader background on EBTs, see Practice Note: What is an employee benefit trust? This Practice Note considers how private company sales can affect EBT share arrangements and the practical hurdles for businesses running them in practice. It explores the potential consequences for EBT-held shares where a private business is sold, and highlights key practical considerations for companies that operate such trusts. Note that further complications may emerge where share trading occurs on a PISCES. For more on this, see Practice Note: PISCES and share incentive arrangements in particular. Understanding the nature of the EBT’s shareholding At the outset, when assessing a potential corporate deal’s effect on an EBT, consider the character of the EBT’s shareholding (held by the trustee or trustees of the EBT (the Trustee)). It will be important to determine the following: does the Trustee hold legal and beneficial title to the shares? If they hold the shares for any beneficiaries of the EBT,...
Share Incentives
Employment-related securities and options: UK CGT treatment, ITEPA interaction, pooling elections, BADR and planning
PRACTICE NOTES
Employment-related securities and options: UK CGT treatment, ITEPA interaction, pooling elections, BADR and planning
Employment-related securities and securities options An employment-related security is, in broad terms, any security—covering shares, certain insurance contract rights, debt, derivatives, warrants, and stakes in investment partnerships and other collective investment schemes—where the chance or right to obtain that security (or an interest in it) arises by virtue of the individual’s employment, or someone else’s employment. Whether securities are employment-related determines the tax treatment on acquisition, on disposal, and throughout ownership. This Practice Note examines how the income tax charging provisions interact with the capital gains tax (CGT) framework on disposals of employment-related securities. Share options are not categorised as employment-related securities; for tax purposes they are called ‘securities options’, although options are very often granted over employment-related securities. For more on the definition, see Practice Note: What is an employment-related security? The capital gains tax regime When an individual sells or otherwise disposes of an asset for a profit, a CGT charge may arise on the ‘chargeable gain’. Ordinarily, CGT is calculated by reference to the consideration...
Share Incentives
Transferring businesses and subsidiaries within a group: share scheme implications for SIP, SAYE, CSOP, EMI, eligibility, corporation tax and redundancy
PRACTICE NOTES
Transferring businesses and subsidiaries within a group: share scheme implications for SIP, SAYE, CSOP, EMI, eligibility, corporation tax and redundancy
Introduction Groups of companies carry out reorganisations for numerous and varied reasons; however, whatever the motivation, such changes frequently influence existing share plans and other employee equity arrangements. At times the effect is commercial, yet it is important to take care that any valuable tax advantages are not forfeited. transferring the business of one group company to another group company, often arising from an acquisition or to enable the sale of a specific part of the business and its assets transferring the shares of one subsidiary to another subsidiary so the group achieves the most suitable structure, often following an acquisition or sale of a business, and inserting a new group holding or parent company above an existing parent company, typically to facilitate an initial public offering (IPO) or a new third-party investment, without any change to the group’s ultimate ownership This Practice Note concentrates on the first two forms of reorganisation mentioned above. For details on the impact of placing a new holding company or parent company on top of...
Share Incentives
UK employment-related securities: tax indemnities—drafting, PAYE/NIC recovery, s222 ITEPA and RCAs; application to EMI, CSOP, SAYE and SIP
PRACTICE NOTES
UK employment-related securities: tax indemnities—drafting, PAYE/NIC recovery, s222 ITEPA and RCAs; application to EMI, CSOP, SAYE and SIP
Introduction A tax indemnity allows an employer to recoup income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) from an employee, typically through a range of methods to keep flexibility for both sides. Within share schemes, they are especially significant because an employer may need to settle substantial sums with HMRC and, without a binding recovery mechanism, could be left exposed. Where income tax becomes due on employment related securities or options, an employer may still be required to account for that tax to HMRC even if no cash is received. Generally, this duty arises where the securities are ‘readily convertible assets’ (RCAs) or deemed RCAs at the time of the taxable event, or where the employee receives cash or RCAs in connection with them. For further guidance on when shares constitute RCAs, see Practice Note: Share options and readily convertible assets. Additionally, an employer can have an obligation to account for tax even if the securities are not RCAs in certain circumstances, for example where a charge is triggered by the anti-avoidance legislation in Part 7A of the...
Share Incentives
Precedent letter to LTIP award holders on rights issue impact: adjustments to award size and performance conditions, certificate handling, calculation methodology and tax FAQs
PRECEDENTS
Precedent letter to LTIP award holders on rights issue impact: adjustments to award size and performance conditions, certificate handling, calculation methodology and tax FAQs
[ insert name of award holder ] [ insert address ] [ insert postcode ] [ insert date ] Dear [ insert name of award holder ], [ insert name of plan ] Long Term Incentive Plan: effect of recent rights issue on your LTIP award[s] 1 Introduction On [ insert date ], [ insert name of company ] (the Company) invited all of its shareholders to take up an offer to subscribe for additional Company shares. Under this rights issue, shareholders could apply for [ insert number ] new shares for every [ insert number ] shares they already owned. The subscription price was set at [ insert currency and amount ] per new share, representing an approximate discount of [ insert currency and amount ] to the market price on [ insert date ]. [ Further details about the rights issue are provided in the enclosed copy of the document sent to shareholders ]...
Share Incentives
Expert page AD
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.