Annecto Legal Ltd

1 Experts

Clear all filter
Mark Beaumont

Annecto Legal Ltd

2 Contributions by Annecto Legal Ltd Experts

Insolvency litigation funding: seed and portfolio models—key features, benefits, risk allocation and structuring considerations for insolvency practitioners and dispute lawyers
PRACTICE NOTES
Funders regard insolvency disputes as compelling for the following reasons: claims typically display clear causation and are underpinned by strong documentary evidence and records insolvency practitioners (IPs), acting as officers of the court, bring credibility and rigour to the process financial recoveries can be substantial, especially in cases involving director misconduct or asset tracing This Practice Note discusses seed funding and portfolio funding in detail. For further reading on third party litigation funding more generally, please consult the following Practice Notes set out below: Third party litigation funding—a guide for dispute resolution practitioners Third party litigation funding for insolvency practitioners Third party litigation funding process for insolvency practitioners Funding and litigating a claim vs selling or assigning a claim Litigation funding agreements—pricing Litigation funding
Restructuring & Insolvency
Insurance alternatives to third‑party funding in insolvency claims: WIP and own costs cover, creditor capital protection and ATE
PRACTICE NOTES
Insolvency practitioners (IPs) will recognise the established routes to finance claims, such as conditional fee agreements (CFAs), damages-based agreements (DBAs), third party funding, creditor-backed funding, assigning a cause of action, and after-the-event (ATE) insurance. See: Funding of insolvency litigation and investigations—overview. Yet, for many, the burgeoning practice of using insurance to mitigate not only adverse costs and security for costs but also their own spend is less well known. ATE providers have broadened their offerings to cover own disbursements, counsel’s fees, solicitor’s fees, and the work in progress of restructuring specialists. From 2013, the insolvency litigation funding landscape has had to respond to sweeping changes under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, including the non-recoverability of CFA success uplifts and ATE premiums from the losing side (implementation for insolvency cases was postponed until April 2016). As with
Restructuring & Insolvency
If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.