Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
European Union

EU ePrivacy Directive: electronic communications privacy, GDPR interplay, security/confidentiality, traffic and location data, directories and caller ID, itemised billing, unsolicited marketing, EECC updates, and key CJEU case law

Published by a LexisNexis EU Law expert
Practice notes
imgtext

This Practice Note explores Directive 2002/58/EC (the ePrivacy Directive)

This Practice Note examines Directive 2002/58/EC (the ePrivacy Directive), which sets rules on the confidentiality of communications and the processing of personal data within the electronic communications sector. It forms part of a series of Practice Notes addressing key features of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications. Across the EU, the supply of electronic communications networks and services in each Member State is subject to a common regulatory scheme, which previously consisted of five directives, including the ePrivacy Directive. See Practice Note: EU regulatory framework for electronic communications [Archived]. The framework’s original purpose was to deliver a harmonised regime for regulating the electronic communications sector. In December 2018, the framework was revised through Directive (EU) 2018/1972 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast) (the European Electronic Communications Code). That measure consolidated four of the directives making up the framework. The European Electronic Communications Code has applied since December 2018, although Member States had until 21 December 2020 to transpose it into national law. See Practice Note: The European Electronic Communications Code. The ePrivacy Directive remains the only directive in the framework not consolidated into the Code. Note that the ePrivacy Directive was...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
David Stewart
David Stewart

David Stewart joined Towerhouse LLP as a partner in July 2013. David is a competition and regulatory lawyer with a career-long specialisation in regulated sectors, with particular experience in communications. David was previously a Competition Policy Director at Ofcom, the UK's converged communications regulator, leading Ofcom's programme of fixed and mobile telecoms market reviews, including Ofcom's advisory role in mergers in the sector. He also served as Ofcom's Director of Investigations, leading the UK's largest competition law enforcement programme at an economic regulator, and responsible for enforcing consumer law and regulatory rules and resolving access and interconnection disputes. He held a governance role in relation to Ofcom's work on competition in broadcasting markets (including pay TV), spectrum clearance and awards, consumer policy, internet policy and enforcement. He was also involved in Ofcom's engagement in European and international regulatory issues, regularly...

Web page updated on 21/05/2026

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow