Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts

PACE 1984 Section 78 Applications to Exclude Identification Evidence for Code D Breaches: Practical Checklist (England and Wales)

Checklists
imgtext

Checklist

This Checklist outlines the principal matters and actions practitioners should address when formulating an application under section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) to bar identification evidence owing to non‑compliance with Code of Practice D (PACE Code D). It also addresses relevant disclosure obligations, the relationship with the Turnbull guidelines and the Crown Court Compendium, and the court’s ongoing authority to exclude or confine identification evidence during the trial. For guidance on applications under PACE 1984, s 78 to exclude evidence, see the Practice Note: Exclusion of unfair evidence in criminal proceedings. For comprehensive advice on contesting identification evidence, see the Practice Note: Challenging visual identification evidence...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
Paul Ozin
Paul Ozin , KC chambers

Paul Ozin KC specialises principally in the fields of financial and business crime, regulatory and disciplinary proceedings and related public law and civil actions. He is an established writer and speaker in those fields.He has particular expertise in defending and prosecuting in financial crime cases (including company, business, revenue, market related, advance fee, factoring, bribery and corruption, money laundering, confiscation and asset recovery). He is well placed to deal with the whole landscape of financial crime cases, with complementary expertise in regulatory and disciplinary proceedings including police and financial regulatory and disciplinary proceedings.He is appointed to the SFO's list of KCs. His past appointments include: Standing Counsel in crime to BEIS (Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy); SFO's Panel of Advocates ' List A; CPS Panel of Advocates ' Level 4 (and appointment at level 4 to specialist panels: (i) Serious Crime Group panel (ii)...

Alex Mills
Alex Mills

Alex Mills has a diverse criminal law (prosecution and defence) and regulatory law practice. In recent years he has represented or advised SFO, FCA, CPS, the Insolvency Service, the Metropolitan Police and defendants in a relation to criminal investigations, investigatory powers, criminal proceedings, confiscation and restraint. He has experience of the Money Laundering Regulations. His regulatory practice is divided between representing the regulators of financial professionals (ACCA, the Taxation Disciplinary Board) and the major healthcare regulators (GMC, GDC)....

Web page updated on 20/05/2026

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow