Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
European Union

EU AVMS Directive (2010/13/EU, as amended by 2018/1808): scope incl. VSPs, country-of-origin, content/advertising controls, European works quotas, EMFA changes and upcoming evaluation

Published by a LexisNexis EU Law expert
Practice notes
imgtext

This Practice Note offers guidance on the consolidated EU Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive (Directive 2010/13/EU). The EU AVMS Directive sets out rules that govern content and advertising for AVMS. The Original EU AVMS Directive applied to traditional television (linear services) and on‑demand programmes (non‑linear services).

This Practice Note also addresses the later amendments introduced by the Revised EU AVMS Directive (Directive (EU) 2018/1808). Throughout, ‘EU AVMS Directive’ is used to describe the overall EU AVMS regulatory framework first set in Directive 2010/13/EU and then updated by Directive (EU) 2018/1808. Where the text refers only to Directive 2010/13/EU, it uses ‘Original EU AVMS Directive’; where it refers solely to Directive (EU) 2018/1808, it uses ‘Revised EU AVMS Directive’.

Historical regulatory context

In the early 1980s, viewers had relatively few programme choices—state-owned and other terrestrial free‑to‑air broadcasters dominated the market and were tightly controlled by domestic broadcasting regimes. The technological shift of that decade, including satellite transmission, drove swift advances in television and radio distribution and spurred the emergence of commercial TV and radio outlets across Western Europe. The laws...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
Josh Boyden
Josh Boyden

Josh is an associate in Baker McKenzie's IP and Technology team based in London. He joined the Firm in 2016 and was admitted as a solicitor in England and Wales in 2018. Josh's practice encompasses a wide range of IP and technology related issues, with a particular focus on copyright and digital media. Josh regularly advises clients on cutting-edge tech regulation, intermediary liability, music and content licensing, product counsel, notice and takedown and artificial intelligence issues.  Josh also advises on the IP aspects of M&A and broader commercial transactions, notably in the technology and copyright spheres; and has experience working on complex multijurisdictional copyright disputes....

Birgit Clark
Birgit Clark

Birgit qualified as Attorney-at-Law in Germany in 2001 and subsequently also as UK and European trade mark attorney and solicitor. Having published her doctoral thesis in the field of intellectual property and privacy laws, she has been specialising in trade marks and designs and related soft IP in the United Kingdom since 2006. Birgit is an extensively published legal author (in English and German) and legal commentator and blogger. She is lead knowledge lawyer for Baker McKenzie’s global IP & Technology practice....

Kathy Harford
Kathy Harford

Kathy Harford is a Knowledge Lawyer supporting Baker McKenzie's London Intellectual Property, Data and Technology team.  With a background in IP litigation and particular expertise in complex, cross-border patent disputes in the life sciences sector, Kathy provides knowledge support to Baker McKenzie's IP, data and technology lawyers....

Jason Raeburn
Jason Raeburn

Jason heads up the London intellectual property and technology litigation practice at Paul Hastings.Jason's practice has a particular focus on complex IP and technology disputes, often relating to trade secrets, copyright and patents in the fields of software development and licensing, cloud and AI-related implementations. His practice also encompasses IP crossover issues involving breach of contract, IT infrastructure, the misuse of data and reputational threats.Jason also sits part-time as a judge in the English High Court, as a Deputy Master of the Chancery Division and formerly as a Judge of the First-Tier Tribunal, hearing specialist appeals.Jason was recognised by Who's Who Legal as a 'Future Leader' in Litigation (2021) and (2020) having been identified as one of 'the most promising litigators in the world, whose skills and expertise are already turning heads at an international level'.Jason has been identified as a 'Next...

Web page updated on 21/05/2026

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow