Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Ukraine conflict aviation insurance: claims under operator and contingent/possessed policies, war risks causation, sanctions and jurisdiction, and implications of AerCap v AIG

Practice notes
imgtext

STOP PRESS:

On 11 June 2025, the High Court delivered its judgment in a test case uniting six claims brought by AerCap and other lessors against their insurers. The court determined that:

  • the relevant aircraft and engines were lost in March 2022
  • the proximate cause of that loss was the coming into force of a Russian Government Resolution (GR 311), which constituted a “restraint” or “detention” under the Government perils of each claimant’s war risk cover; the loss was not proximately caused by any hull all risks peril
  • each claimant could recover for its lost aircraft and engines under the contingent cover of its policy or policies, save for Genesis’s claim regarding the share of its war risk cover underwritten by TMK Syndicate 510, which failed
  • no claimant had a valid claim under the possessed cover of its policy or policies

On 31 March 2026, the Court of Appeal granted war risks insurers Fidelis, Lloyd’s and Chubb permission to appeal their liability, having held that their appeal had a prospect of success. See News Analysis: War-risk...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
Russell Butland
Russell Butland

Russell has experience in advising major international corporations and financial institutions on a wide range of commercial disputes in the English Courts and international arbitration proceedings. He has particular expertise in insurance disputes, regularly acting for policyholders in high value, complex claims under professional indemnity, directors and officers, property damage and business interruption, aviation, and trade credit and political risk claims. In addition to advising on insurance litigation, Russell also has particular expertise acting for defendants in competition damages claims.Russell is ranked “Up and Coming” for Insurance: Policyholders in Chambers, and his directory quotes from clients include: "Russell explains complex subjects in a straightforward and easy to understand way. He understands our goals and is very commercial.", "He made us feel we were in good hands every step of the process." (Chambers UK 2023) and "Russell Butland - Strikingly able and tests every angle of an...

Hugo Flaux
Hugo Flaux

Hugo is a Senior Associate in Allen & Overy’s London team, advising clients on insurance and commercial disputes. He advises financial institutions and corporate clients, particularly in the shipping and aviation sectors, in litigation and arbitration matters. He regularly acts for policyholders in insurance disputes, including in professional indemnity, directors and officers, and aviation claims.A directory quote from a client said: “Hugo Flaux is brilliant. He performs well beyond his level of qualification and has a great sense of humour. He is extremely clever, and was on top of all the legal arguments in our case, as well as the evidential aspects. His ability to get to grips with the technical aspects of the case was impressive. He was also super-organised on the procedural front. All in all, a dream to work with!” (Legal 500 UK, 2021)....

Web page updated on 22/05/2026

Popular documents

When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...

Read More Right Arrow

This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...

Read More Right Arrow

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...

Read More Right Arrow

I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...

Read More Right Arrow