Featured documents
This Practice Note outlines the law concerning criminal recklessness. The subjective test for recklessness Certain statutory and common law offences allow the prosecution to prove mens rea through ‘recklessness’. Put simply, recklessness is where the accused takes an unjustified risk that results in unlawful harm or damage. The House of Lords in R v G reaffirmed the subjective approach to recklessness. Before R v G, two distinct tests were used, depending on the offence charged: Subjective recklessness from R v Cunningham: the prosecution had to establish that the accused personally foresaw the risk. Objective recklessness from R v Caldwell: the prosecution only needed to show that the risk would have been obvious to a reasonable person, without proving the accused themselves foresaw it. In R v G, the House of Lords concluded that the objective test could operate unfairly where a defendant did not foresee the
This Practice Note examines the remedy of rescission, explaining when and in what manner a contract can be unwound (at common law, in equity and under statute) and thereby terminated and brought to an end. It covers the consequences and effects of rescission, the principal grounds for setting aside an agreement (misrepresentation, mistake, undue influence, duress, non‑disclosure, fiduciary misdealing and bribery) and the main obstacles to claiming rescission—affirmation, the intervention of third‑party rights and the impossibility of restitution. For further guidance on rescission in the context of misrepresentation, see Practice Note: Misrepresentation—rescission as a remedy. There are many ways in which a contract may reach its end; see: Terminating contracts—how and when a contract ends—overview for a brief and accessible summary, with links to the related further practical guidance, including Practice Note: Termination and expiry of contracts. For a table
What is a res judicata? A res judicata is a determination by a court or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which finally disposes of the issues decided so they cannot be litigated again by those bound, save on appeal. Final judgments entered by default or by consent fall within this concept, whereas rulings on purely procedural points and any decision lacking finality do not. The doctrine’s aim is to bring litigation to an end and shield parties from being harassed by the same dispute twice. in personam—binds the parties and their privies in rem—binds all persons, privy or otherwise (ie a judgment binding the whole world) A party may rely on res judicata: as an estoppel to defeat an opponent’s claim or defence; and/or as the basis of their own claim or
The offence of causing grievous bodily harm with intent Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent can be tried solely in the Crown Court on indictment. Elements of the offence Under the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (OATPA 1861), the prosecution must establish that the defendant unlawfully and maliciously: wounded with the intention of causing GBH, or caused GBH with that intention, or wounded intending to resist or prevent the lawful arrest or detention of any person, or caused GBH intending to resist or prevent the lawful arrest or detention of any person ‘Unlawfully’ and ‘maliciously’ Unlawfully The wounding or causing of GBH must be unlawful. Such conduct may be lawful if used: in self-defence in defence of another in defence of property for the prevention of crime where the victim gave express or implied consent For further information on these defences, see below:
Most recent Practice notes
For any dispute resolution lawyer scrutinising a contract during a dispute, two central questions arise: what does the contract signify? what rights and obligations do the parties hold under it? This Practice Note explains the five interpretative principles the courts employ to address those questions, first articulated by Lord Hoffmann in 1998 in the leading case Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society ( ICS), with additional guidance from later Supreme Court authorities: Rainy Sky v Kookmin (2011), Arnold v Britton (2015) and Wood v Capita (2017), as outlined further below. Read this alongside Practice Note: Contract interpretation—rules of contract interpretation. Depending on the forum in which your case is heard, you should also consider any extra requirements—see below: Court specific guidance. ICS v West Bromwich Building Society— Lord Hoffman's guiding principles In 1998, in Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society, Lord...
Practice Note This Practice Note offers practical direction on how companies should execute documents after 6 April 2008 (being the date on which the pertinent provisions of the Companies Act 2006 ( CA 2006) took effect). It addresses the execution of deeds by companies, and the execution of simple contracts by and on behalf of companies. If advising on documents signed before 6 April 2008 (for instance, in a dispute), practitioners should consider the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 1985. Throughout, it is assumed the executing company is a private company subject to CA 2006 and that the document is in writing. For execution points relevant to other legal entities, see: Execution—overview. We have assembled a collection that serves as a comprehensive, interactive resource to help users identify and work through the concepts and common issues that arise when executing...
STOP PRESS: As of 24 February 2025, the principal provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 ( PA 2023) are in effect. Procurements initiated on or after that date must proceed under PA 2023, while those started under the earlier regime—the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 ( PCR 2015), the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016, the Concession Regulations 2016, and the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011—must continue to be run and overseen in accordance with that legislation. See Practice Note: Introduction to the Procurement Act 2023— PA 2023. PCR 2015 as assimilated law PCR 2015 are EU-derived domestic legislation and therefore fall within assimilated law under sections 2 and 6 of the European Union ( Withdrawal) Act 2018. For practical guidance on the status and construction of assimilated law, see Practice Note: Assimilated law. Investigating abnormally low...
Administration Administration is a process intended to give a company time to breathe, aiming either at rescue or restructuring, or at securing a better result for all creditors than liquidation wherever possible. The core statutory framework for administration sits in Section 8 and Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 ( IA 1986), together with the Insolvency ( England and Wales) Rules 2016, IR 2016, SI 2016/1024 rr 3.1–3.70, which apply in tandem. An administrator, an insolvency practitioner appointed under IA 1986, takes control of the company’s business and assets to pursue one of the three statutory purposes of administration set out in IA 1986......
This Practice Note offers hands-on guidance on correctly executing simple contracts and deeds for general partnerships. For details on execution by limited liability partnerships, see Practice Note: Execution formalities—limited liability partnerships. For execution by limited partnerships, see Practice Note: Execution formalities—limited partnerships. We have assembled a comprehensive, interactive Execution collection to help users pinpoint and address the key concepts and recurring issues in document execution. Each stage features practical guidance, precedent clauses and Q& As tailored to that step. For more, see: Execution collection... Quick view The summary below outlines the core execution formalities for partnerships and indicates where the relevant precedent execution clauses are located. For fuller guidance, go to the document type via the links in the first column... Simple contracts Can be made: On behalf of the partnership. Executed by: The...
This Practice Note This Practice Note examines force majeure within the context of English law and the circumstances in which a force majeure event may bring a contract to an end, addressing the burden of proof, construction of force majeure clauses (including the operative verb), procedural obligations, and how to challenge the validity of a force majeure clause. See also Practice Notes: Force majeure clause analysis—a practical guide Force majeure—key and illustrative decisions For assistance when giving notice of a force majeure event, see Precedent: Force majeure notice. Force majeure clauses came under intense scrutiny in light of ‘world events’, such as the coronavirus ( COVID-19) pandemic in 2020 and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, on which see: Force majeure and current world events below......
This Practice Note discusses the two ‘failure to prevent’ corporate criminal offences created by the Criminal Finances Act 2017 ( CFA 2017): CFA 2017, s 45 establishes the offence of failing to prevent the facilitation of a UK tax evasion offence(s) ( UK tax evasion facilitation offence) CFA 2017, s 46 establishes the offence of failing to prevent the facilitation of a foreign tax evasion offence(s) (foreign tax evasion facilitation offence) Both offences impose strict liability, with a ‘reasonable procedures’ defence for those able to show they maintained reasonable procedures designed to prevent facilitation of the underlying tax evasion offences. This Practice Note explains the components of each offence and the defences introduced by the CFA 2017. The offences sit within a broader suite of measures aimed at combating tax evasion and its facilitation, both in the UK and worldwide. They are...
Facilitating the performance of a duty by public officials Facilitation payments, sometimes termed ‘grease’ or ‘facilitating’ payments, are typically modest sums made to public officials or third parties in order to secure the carrying out of their functions, either more swiftly or even to ensure it occurs at all. This may extend to the giving of ‘gifts’, such as cigarettes or alcohol. In certain jurisdictions, these payments are routine and lawful (eg permitted in some situations under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 ( FCPA 1977); see Practice Note: The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 ( FCPA 1977) and Bribery Act 2010 ( BA 2010) comparison table). Are facilitation payments illegal under BA 2010? Such payments amount to the offering, promising or providing of a financial advantage and therefore constitute bribery, as the Bribery Act 2010 ( BA 2010) provides no...
This Practice Note sets out practical guidance on how overseas companies execute documents, with particular emphasis on executions occurring on or after 1 October 2009 under the Overseas Companies ( Execution of Documents and Registration of Charges) Regulations 2009, SI 2009/1917. For the purposes of this note, it is assumed the contract is in writing. We have created an Execution collection—an extensive, interactive resource—to help users recognise and navigate the concepts and common issues arising on execution. Each stage or phase contains practical guidance, precedent clauses and Q& As relevant to that stage. For further information, see: Execution collection. The law relating to overseas companies The execution of documents by overseas companies is governed by the Overseas Companies ( Execution of Documents and Registration of Charges) Regulations 2009 ( OC( EDRC) R 2009), SI 2009/1917. These regulations apply, with...
Parties often wish to stipulate that the entirety of their contractual relationship is governed by the written agreement they have signed. This is known as an ‘entire agreement clause’. This Practice Note examines why such clauses are used and the principal issues relevant to their operation, including the interplay between entire agreement clauses and implied terms, misrepresentation, fraud and exclusion clauses, non-reliance statements, and broader matters of evidential estoppel and contractual estoppel. For further guidance on construing the scope of parties’ contractual obligations, see Practice Notes: The parol evidence rule in interpreting contracts Contract interpretation—admissibility of surrounding documents and related content What is an entire agreement clause? At its simplest, an entire agreement clause provides that the whole of the parties’ contractual dealings is governed exclusively by the terms contained in their written contract. Consequently, when interpreting the contract, the court is...
Practice Note: The duty of fidelity and fiduciary duties As explained in Practice Note: The duty of fidelity and fiduciary duties, an implied duty of fidelity in every contract of employment will ordinarily prevent an employee from revealing to third parties confidential material learned in the course of their work. In addition, highly sensitive business information, commonly described as trade secrets, is protected by the equitable duty of confidence. Taken together, these obligations have historically shaped the implied responsibility owed by employees in relation to confidential information. The classification of business information is therefore pivotal: during employment, an employee is subject to an implied obligation not to disclose trade secrets and/or confidential information to others; after employment ends, only the implied restraint against revealing trade secrets persists. One exception is that a former employee may be stopped from benefiting,...
This Practice Note explores the Consumer Rights Act 2015 ( CRA 2015) in the context of how fair and transparent business-to-consumer ( B2C) contract terms and notices must be. It addresses carve-outs from the unfair terms regime, the assessment of fairness, the ‘grey list’ of potentially unfair clauses, the transparency requirement, outright prohibitions, and how these rules are enforced. For an overall guide to the CRA 2015, including the definitions of ‘consumer’ and ‘trader’, see Practice Note: Consumer Rights Act 2015—summary. For how the CRA 2015 applies to goods, services and digital content, see: Consumer Rights Act 2015—goods Consumer Rights Act 2015—services Consumer Rights Act 2015—digital content Guidance on specific B2C boilerplate provisions—adjudication, alternative dispute resolution ( ADR), arbitration, assignment, definitions and interpretation, entire agreement, force majeure, governing law, jurisdiction, variation and waiver—is in Practice Note: Boilerplate clauses in...
This Practice Note sets out the core principles for securing injunctions concerning confidential information and privacy. Although other remedies exist for claimants in breach of confidence matters, stopping publication of the material by injunction is frequently the only remedy of real practical worth to the claimant. It also addresses anonymised injunctions, alongside both interim and final injunctions. In recent years, injunctions touching on confidentiality and privacy have provoked debate. So‑called ‘super‑injunctions’ have drawn media criticism for constraining free expression; yet much of this derives from misunderstanding of what a ‘super‑injunction’ actually signifies and from the false sense that such orders are far more common than they are. This Practice Note explains the overarching principles for obtaining relief in this field. For further material on privacy injunctions, see the following Practice Notes: Privacy law—misuse of private...
This Practice Note This Practice Note has been revised following the introduction of the Arbitration Act 2025 and now points to changes made to the Arbitration Act 1996. For more detail on commencement and transitional arrangements, see Practice Note: Arbitration Act 2025 commencement and transitional provisions. It offers an overview of arbitration and its principal characteristics, concentrating on practice under the law of England and Wales, including the Arbitration Act 1996 ( AA 1996), as modified by the Arbitration Act 2025 ( AA 2025), which obtained Royal Assent on 24 February 2025 and took effect on 1 August 2025. Arbitration is a conclusive and binding method of resolving disputes, overseen by a constituted arbitral tribunal (usually one or three arbitrators) operating in a quasi-judicial way. As a rule, it rests on the parties' agreement (the arbitration agreement) and is supervised and enforced by...
Form of commercial contracts This Practice Note sets out the structure and format of a business‑to‑business commercial contract or agreement. It summarises the usual layout of commercial agreements and identifies the details to include in the contract document, covering the parties, background (recitals), the main body, schedules, and the attestation provisions. How a contract is formed A contract is a legally enforceable arrangement that gives rights and imposes duties between two or more parties. For a contract to exist, contract law requires four core elements: offer (see Practice Note: Forming enforceable contracts—offer) acceptance (see Practice Note: Forming enforceable contracts—acceptance) consideration (see Practice Note: Forming enforceable contracts—consideration) an intention to create legal relations (see Practice Note: Forming enforceable contracts—intention to create legal relations) Simple contracts v deeds Simple contracts may arise orally, by conduct, or in writing. Certain categories of simple contract, however, must be in...
Repudiation This Practice Note addresses repudiation and clarifies what constitutes a repudiatory breach of contract. It outlines how such a breach strikes at the heart of the agreement and the courses open to the innocent party following the other party’s repudiation, namely choosing to accept the repudiatory breach and treat the contract as terminated, or alternatively to affirm the agreement. The Practice Note also sets out the concept of anticipatory breach of contract and considers when that, too, may amount to a repudiatory breach. The right to terminate for a repudiatory breach arises at common law and is a technically demanding area, extensively illustrated by case law. A party contemplating termination for another party’s repudiatory breach is advised to proceed with care. Termination on this basis is not a risk‑free approach, and every matter must be assessed on its particular facts. Where a party...
This Practice Note This Practice Note provides an overview of the safeguards available for geographical indications ( GIs) and designations of origin, such as appellations of origin, protected designations of origin ( PDOs) and protected GIs ( PGIs) in the UK, and highlights distinctions between the systems in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It examines the relationship between appellations of origin, PDOs and PGIs and trade mark law. It outlines the international architecture for protection under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and the Agreement on Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the TRIPS Agreement). It further reviews the protections afforded by UK legislation, including the UK GI scheme—introduced when the EU regime ceased to apply in Great Britain—as well as the narrower protection available under the Trade Marks Act 1994 ( TMA 1994). Businesses frequently seek to adopt marks that point to the...
This Practice Note outlines the formal requirements for witnesses, covering who may witness another person’s signature on a document connected to a commercial deal, such as a deed or simple contract, as well as witnessing electronic signatures and the current approach to video witnessing in practice. For guidance on witnessing wills, see Practice Note: Validity of Wills—signature. We have created a collection that serves as a comprehensive, interactive resource to help users recognise and navigate the concepts and frequent issues and pitfalls in executing documents, including the witnessing of signatures. Each stage or phase provides practical guidance, precedent clauses and Q& As relevant to that stage. For further details, see: Execution collection. Witnessing What is the difference between witnessing and attestation? Witnessing is the act of observing the execution of a document. Attestation adds the further step of noting, on the document itself, that the witness has seen the...
This Practice Note examines early neutral evaluation ( ENE), a type of alternative dispute resolution ( ADR). What is ENE? ENE involves the parties asking an impartial evaluator to provide a view on the strengths of the case or on discrete issues. Typically, the evaluator is a solicitor, barrister or subject-matter specialist. On occasion a judge may act in this role; see: Judicial ENE. As with other ADR processes, the structure is agreed by the parties, but it commonly features: a more interventionist approach than mediation; rather than shuttling between sides, the evaluator sets out, often in firm terms, their view of the probable result the evaluator’s view is usually not binding their assessment can provide a platform for later settlement discussions As the evaluator’s view is typically non-binding and frequently delivered without the full factual record that a trial would reveal, a party...
Contractual joint venture agreements This Practice Note outlines the principal commercial considerations and available choices to weigh up when preparing or assessing a contractual joint venture agreement. It addresses the preparation of a contractual joint venture where the parties to the venture conclude a contractual arrangement that records the terms governing their co-operation and collaboration. It does not deal with corporate joint ventures. The participants to the joint venture should evaluate the type of joint venture arrangement and the structure that is most appropriate to meet the participants’ objectives. For related guidance, see Practice Notes: Setting up a joint venture—choice of structure and Drafting for particular types of contractual joint venture......
Popular documents
When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...
This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...
Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...
I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...
Discover more from LexisNexis
