This Practice Note outlines the law concerning criminal recklessness. The subjective test for recklessness Certain statutory and common law offences allow the prosecution to prove mens rea through ‘recklessness’. Put simply, recklessness is where the accused takes an unjustified risk that results in unlawful harm or damage. The House of Lords in R v G reaffirmed the subjective approach to recklessness. Before R v G, two distinct tests were used, depending on the offence charged: Subjective recklessness from R v Cunningham: the prosecution had to establish that the accused personally foresaw the risk. Objective recklessness from R v Caldwell: the prosecution only needed to show that the risk would have been obvious to a reasonable person, without proving the accused themselves foresaw it. In R v G, the House of Lords concluded that the objective test could operate unfairly where a defendant did not foresee the
This Practice Note examines the remedy of rescission, explaining when and in what manner a contract can be unwound (at common law, in equity and under statute) and thereby terminated and brought to an end. It covers the consequences and effects of rescission, the principal grounds for setting aside an agreement (misrepresentation, mistake, undue influence, duress, non‑disclosure, fiduciary misdealing and bribery) and the main obstacles to claiming rescission—affirmation, the intervention of third‑party rights and the impossibility of restitution. For further guidance on rescission in the context of misrepresentation, see Practice Note: Misrepresentation—rescission as a remedy. There are many ways in which a contract may reach its end; see: Terminating contracts—how and when a contract ends—overview for a brief and accessible summary, with links to the related further practical guidance, including Practice Note: Termination and expiry of contracts. For a table
What is a res judicata? A res judicata is a determination by a court or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which finally disposes of the issues decided so they cannot be litigated again by those bound, save on appeal. Final judgments entered by default or by consent fall within this concept, whereas rulings on purely procedural points and any decision lacking finality do not. The doctrine’s aim is to bring litigation to an end and shield parties from being harassed by the same dispute twice. in personam—binds the parties and their privies in rem—binds all persons, privy or otherwise (ie a judgment binding the whole world) A party may rely on res judicata: as an estoppel to defeat an opponent’s claim or defence; and/or as the basis of their own claim or
The offence of causing grievous bodily harm with intent Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent can be tried solely in the Crown Court on indictment. Elements of the offence Under the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (OATPA 1861), the prosecution must establish that the defendant unlawfully and maliciously: wounded with the intention of causing GBH, or caused GBH with that intention, or wounded intending to resist or prevent the lawful arrest or detention of any person, or caused GBH intending to resist or prevent the lawful arrest or detention of any person ‘Unlawfully’ and ‘maliciously’ Unlawfully The wounding or causing of GBH must be unlawful. Such conduct may be lawful if used: in self-defence in defence of another in defence of property for the prevention of crime where the victim gave express or implied consent For further information on these defences, see below:
Where conduct carries a stronger public policy dimension—such as dealing in counterfeit goods or acts of piracy—it is open to pursue criminal proceedings alongside civil action as well. Typically, infringements reaching the criminal threshold are systematic, repeated operations deliberately designed to produce revenue through the infringing behaviour. There is, moreover, a clear rationale for treating these matters as criminal, as those engaged may divert the proceeds to finance other, more serious forms of organised crime. Even so, in practice, copyright owners tend to prefer civil routes rather than criminal prosecution, in no small part because the criminal standard of proof presents a greater obstacle for the prosecution in criminal cases; note, however, that if a permitted act is invoked by way of defence, the defendant carries a balance of probabilities burden. For criminal allegations, the owner must also establish knowledge or reason to...
This Practice Note sets out guidance on an individual’s rights as a data subject in the employment setting. It explores the matters an employer organisation should consider when drafting a privacy notice to fulfil the right to be informed, which applies to employees, as well as other workers and contractors. It refers to employers and to employees, although comparable principles apply where people are workers or independent contractors. It reflects the UK GDPR framework, and legislative references are to Assimilated Regulation ( EU) 2016/679, the UK General Data Protection Regulation ( UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018 ( DPA 2018), unless stated otherwise. For an overview of the key themes of Assimilated Regulation ( EU) 2016/679, UK GDPR and DPA 2018, and guidance on issues relevant to employment lawyers, see Practice Notes: The UK GDPR and DPA 2018: key data...
A requestor, or more accurately a complainant, may challenge the handling of a request for environmental information where they believe a public authority has not met a requirement under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, SI 2004/3391 ( EIR 2004). The initial step is to take the matter up with the relevant public authority. If it remains unresolved, the further steps referred to in this Practice Note should then be followed... How and when should a requestor complain? Internal complaints procedure In the first instance, a complaint should be submitted to the relevant public authority itself, which is required to operate a process for handling internal complaints. It should be lodged within 40 working days from the date on which the complainant considers the authority failed to comply with the EIR. Upon receipt of a complaint, the public authority must, free of charge: consider the...
This Practice Note This Practice Note offers practical guidance for preparing a jurisdiction clause in a commercial, business-to-business ( B2B) contract. It explains what a jurisdiction clause is, why it is required and how it differs from governing law clauses. It outlines key drafting issues, including scope; whether to choose exclusive, non-exclusive or asymmetric jurisdiction; carve-outs to allow alternative dispute resolution; the effect of using the word ‘irrevocably’; waivers of forum non conveniens; the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements; the 2019 Hague Judgments Convention; and the approach to clauses submitting to the courts of England and Wales where proceedings are brought outside England and Wales. This Practice Note does not address the position for jurisdiction clauses in business-to-consumer ( B2C) contracts. For more detail, see Practice Note: Governing law and jurisdiction in contracts with UK consumers. This Practice Note is...
This Practice Note This Practice Note examines the legal and commercial considerations that stem from direct marketing activity. It addresses the pertinent provisions of Assimilated Regulation ( EU) 2016/679, the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation ( UK GDPR), the Privacy and Electronic Communications ( EC Directive) Regulations 2003 ( PECR 2003), SI 2003/2426, and the Data ( Use and Access) Act 2025 ( DUAA 2025), insofar as they relate to direct marketing (including the soft opt-in), covering live and automated calls, unsolicited email campaigns, text message promotion, and reliance on marketing lists. Alongside the UK GDPR, PECR 2003 and DUAA 2025, it also reviews other regulatory and industry frameworks pertinent to direct marketing. These comprise the UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing ( CAP Code), the Data & Marketing Association’s Code ( DMA Code), the...
This Practice Note outlines principal milestones and details on planned amendments to the Privacy and Electronic Communications ( EC Directive) Regulations 2003 ( PECR 2003), SI 2003/2426, within the broader overhaul of UK data protection rules. It collates materials and proposals from multiple organisations on e Privacy reform, spanning consultations and draft legislation. It addresses UK legal changes from September 2021 onwards. While PECR 2003 gave effect to Directive 2002/58/ EC (the EU e Privacy Directive) domestically, EU-level e Privacy reforms made after 11.00 pm on 31 December 2020 ( IP completion day) are out of scope. For EU developments, see Practice Note: EU e Privacy Directive—tracker. Latest UK position—changes to PECR 2003 Government has advanced legislative changes to PECR 2003 as a strand of its broader data protection reform. A substantial portion has now materialised through the Data ( Use and Access) Act 2025 ( DUAA...
This Practice Note monitors significant High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court rulings concerning data protection, e Privacy, misuse of private information and confidential information. For an introduction to the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation ( EU) 2016/679 ( UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018 ( DPA 2018), see: UK data protection law collection and Practice Notes: The UK General Data Protection Regulation ( UK GDPR) and The Data Protection Act 2018. For introductory materials on e Privacy, misuse of private information and confidential information, see: e Privacy—overview Privacy and misuse of private information—overview Confidential information—overview For a freedom of information and environmental information case tracker, see: Freedom of information case tracker. Cases Infinni Innovations SA v OFMS Ltd [2026] EWHC 470 ( Comm) — High Court — 3 March 2026 —...
This Practice Note sets out the function of a notary, the process for notarising a document, and the concept of legalisation. For further detailed guidance, consult the following Practice Notes: notaries notarisation legalisation We have assembled a comprehensive, interactive collection to assist users in identifying and navigating concepts and recurring issues arising on the execution of documents. Each stage includes Practical Guidance, Precedent Clauses and Q& As tailored to that phase. For more details, see: Execution collection. Notaries A notary is a qualified lawyer whose principal role is to authenticate and certify signatures and documents, whether intended for use overseas or as certified copies. Notaries also administer and take oaths and affirmations, and may undertake certain reserved activities under the Legal Services Act 2007, including commercial and property matters, as well as family and private client work (but not...
This Practice Note explores the function and significance of boilerplate clauses within a contract. It highlights the boilerplate provisions most frequently seen in transaction-related agreements and considers the method to adopt when reviewing or drafting agreements that contain boilerplate terms. Solicitors handle an extensive range of transactions, yet every one of them will, in some respect, involve written contracts. Each of those contracts ought to include certain boilerplate provisions. What is boilerplate? There is no universally accepted definition of a ‘boilerplate’ clause. Such clauses are often regarded as standard, catch-all terms. They are routinely accepted with minimal thought or bargaining, but treating them this way is risky. It is better to view ‘boilerplate’ as a label for the clauses inserted to govern the mechanics of how the agreement operates and the legal considerations common to most transactions. They are typically located at the start and the close of an...
This Practice Note explores the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and how it operates when enforcing a court judgment or a judicial settlement. It addresses what counts as a judgment and a judicial settlement, the criteria for recognition and enforcement of a court judgment, including severability, together with enforcement of non-monetary orders and judicial settlements. The Practice Note also outlines the steps for recognition and enforcement, the supporting documents needed, and points specific to England and Wales. Finally, it considers the bases for refusing recognition or enforcement under the convention. For practitioners using the Convention, an explanatory report by Trevor Hartley and Masato Dogauchi offers detailed commentary on each article. It further signposts severability within judgments and the treatment of non-monetary relief and settlements under the convention. Does the Convention...
This Practice Note offers a practical ‘how to’ overview of making a freedom of information ( FOI) request, with primary attention on applications under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 ( FIA 2000). Both FIA 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 ( EIR 2004), SI 2004/3391, grant a right to access recorded information held by public authorities. The emphasis here is on FIA 2000. For more on EIR 2004, see: Environmental information—overview. This note does not address the grounds for refusing an FOI request or for withholding material. For those topics, see Practice Notes: Absolute exemptions to a freedom of information request and Qualified exemptions to a freedom of information request. Key legislation and guidance This guide should be read alongside the following legislation, code of practice, and Information Commissioner’s Office ( ICO) materials: FIA 2000 Cabinet Office— Freedom of...
Practice Note: Criminal offences under the Data Protection Act 2018 ( DPA 2018) This Practice Note outlines the criminal offences set out in the Data Protection Act 2018 ( DPA 2018). Those provisions took effect on 25 May 2018. For details of the DPA 2018’s aims and coverage, see Practice Note: The Data Protection Act 2018. The DPA 2018 repealed the Data Protection Act 1998 ( DPA 1998) on 25 May 2018. However, data protection offences committed before 25 May 2018 may still be pursued under the DPA 1998 notwithstanding its repeal. For guidance on data protection and data handling offences under the DPA 1998, see Practice Notes: Unlawfully obtaining data under the Data Protection Act 1998 [ Archived] and Notification offences under the Data Protection Act 1998 [ Archived]. The DPA 2018 was later amended by the Data Protection, Privacy and...
A data protection impact assessment ( DPIA) is exactly what it sounds like—an evaluation of how a particular project or process may affect data protection for impacted individuals. This Practice Note sets out: what a DPIA is whether DPIAs are mandatory, and if so who should carry out the assessment, and how It also covers how DPIAs relate to privacy impact assessments ( PIAs) and data protection by design and default ( DPb DD). Precedent: Data protection impact assessment— DPIA aligns with the UK GDPR. See also Precedent: Data protection impact assessment— DPIA—short form, based on an Information Commissioner’s Office ( ICO) template. ICO guidance on DPIAs is available in two places: Data protection impact assessments and Data Protection Impact Assessments ( DPIAs). What is a data protection impact assessment? A DPIA is a practical mechanism to help you: spot and reduce data...
Remedies for misuse of private information and breach of confidence This Practice Note concentrates on the relief available where private information has been misused—whether through an actual or threatened publication, or by the manner in which personal information was obtained—and for breaches of confidence involving the disclosure of personal information. The principal forms of relief are damages and injunctions. Because the law in this field embraces a broad spectrum of factual circumstances, courts take a supple, case-sensitive approach to remedies. Thus, in one set of facts, the most effective way to vindicate the claimant’s privacy may be an injunction restraining an anticipated disclosure; in another, the defendant may already have disclosed the material without authority and derived a commercial gain. In that scenario, suitable relief may include compensatory damages or an order for an account of profits, together with an injunction stopping any further...
This Practice Note sets out practical guidance on the correct execution of simple contracts and deeds by administrative receivers... Quick view The summary below outlines the execution formalities relevant to administrative receivers and points to the location of matching precedent execution clauses. For more detail, navigate to the document type using the links in the first column... Document type: Simple contracts By the company ( Companies Act 2006, s 43(1)(a)): Using the company’s common seal, applied by the administrative receiver under the power in the debenture under which they are appointed — Execution clause—administrative receiver—contract ( Option 2). By the administrative receiver’s signature under the power granted in that debenture, signing in the presence of a witness — Execution...
This Practice Note outlines the nature of waiver and release within commercial contracts, distinguishes between them, and summarises the clauses that address waiver (commonly called a ‘no-waiver’ clause) and release. The waiver clause is widely recognised as a boilerplate provision aimed at preventing unintended waivers of legal rights from taking effect, including the right to terminate after a breach of contract. What does ‘waiver’ mean? In contract law, ‘waiver’ may carry different senses, but most often describes a concession granted by one party whereby it does not demand strict performance by the other of a contractual duty, whether before or after any breach of the term being waived. For discussion of other potential meanings, see: Waiver: Halsbury’s Laws of England [251]. Types of waiver Express Implied from conduct In either case, it must amount to an unequivocal representation arising from a positive and...
This Practice Note explores the territorial reach of the regime set by the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation ( UK GDPR), the Assimilated Regulation ( EU) 2016/679. It also outlines when a UK representative must be designated. For high-level introductions to UK data protection, see Practice Notes: Data protection law—new starter guide and The UK General Data Protection Regulation ( UK GDPR). The UK data protection law collection assembles further general guidance on the UK GDPR framework and is a recommended place to begin research. In brief In outline, and subject to certain limited exceptions, the UK GDPR may apply to: processing of personal data undertaken in connection with the activities of a controller’s or processor’s establishment in the UK, irrespective of whether the processing itself occurs inside or outside the UK processing personal data of data subjects in the UK by a...
This Practice Note presents an overview of the key features of the UK‑ EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement ( UK‑ EU TCA) that pertain to trade in services between the UK and the EU. It explains the TCA’s scope for services and the generally applicable principles, including Market Access, National Treatment, Most Favoured Nation ( MFN), Domestic Regulation, performance requirements, recognition of professional qualifications, entry and temporary stay of persons for business purposes, and the nationality of senior management and boards. It also outlines disciplines tailored to delivery services, telecommunications services, financial services, international maritime transport services, and legal services. Introduction to the UK- EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement On 24 December 2020, UK and EU negotiators reached a deal defining their future relationship. The UK‑ EU TCA is a comprehensive accord responding to the UK’s withdrawal from the EU’s internal market ( Brexit)....
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 ( FIA 2000) places a duty on public authorities to establish and maintain an approved publication scheme, outlining what information they commit to make available. Once adopted, the authority must routinely release material in line with that scheme. The Information Commissioner has issued a single approved scheme that every public authority must adopt exactly as provided. It identifies the classes of information the authority proposes to publish, how that information will be made available, and whether it is free or chargeable. The Information Commissioner’s Office ( ICO) expects organisations to keep their schemes current to meet legal obligations under FIA 2000, and it monitors compliance with the development and maintenance of publication schemes. The model publication scheme Under FIA 2000, s 19(1), every public authority is required to: adopt and maintain a publication scheme concerning the...
STOP PRESS: On 1 August 2023, the Cabinet Office unveiled three new collections of standard contract documents, comprising updated templates and accompanying guidance for the government’s Model Services Contract, Mid- Tier Contract and Short Form Contract. Further direction on adopting these standards is provided in a supplementary Procurement Policy Note ( PPN). PPN 08/23: Using Standard Contracts applies to central government departments, executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies, all of which have been urged to implement the standard contract forms ‘as soon as practicable’. Other public sector organisations are also encouraged to follow the approach set out in PPN 08/23, recommending the use of the standard contracts for all relevant procurements, rather than using bespoke contracts, unless there is an existing government framework or an industry standard contract already in place (for example, for construction projects). Where appropriate, adopting the standard contracts aligns with...
When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...
This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...
Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...
I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...