Featured documents
This Practice Note outlines the law concerning criminal recklessness. The subjective test for recklessness Certain statutory and common law offences allow the prosecution to prove mens rea through ‘recklessness’. Put simply, recklessness is where the accused takes an unjustified risk that results in unlawful harm or damage. The House of Lords in R v G reaffirmed the subjective approach to recklessness. Before R v G, two distinct tests were used, depending on the offence charged: Subjective recklessness from R v Cunningham: the prosecution had to establish that the accused personally foresaw the risk. Objective recklessness from R v Caldwell: the prosecution only needed to show that the risk would have been obvious to a reasonable person, without proving the accused themselves foresaw it. In R v G, the House of Lords concluded that the objective test could operate unfairly where a defendant did not foresee the
This Practice Note examines the remedy of rescission, explaining when and in what manner a contract can be unwound (at common law, in equity and under statute) and thereby terminated and brought to an end. It covers the consequences and effects of rescission, the principal grounds for setting aside an agreement (misrepresentation, mistake, undue influence, duress, non‑disclosure, fiduciary misdealing and bribery) and the main obstacles to claiming rescission—affirmation, the intervention of third‑party rights and the impossibility of restitution. For further guidance on rescission in the context of misrepresentation, see Practice Note: Misrepresentation—rescission as a remedy. There are many ways in which a contract may reach its end; see: Terminating contracts—how and when a contract ends—overview for a brief and accessible summary, with links to the related further practical guidance, including Practice Note: Termination and expiry of contracts. For a table
What is a res judicata? A res judicata is a determination by a court or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which finally disposes of the issues decided so they cannot be litigated again by those bound, save on appeal. Final judgments entered by default or by consent fall within this concept, whereas rulings on purely procedural points and any decision lacking finality do not. The doctrine’s aim is to bring litigation to an end and shield parties from being harassed by the same dispute twice. in personam—binds the parties and their privies in rem—binds all persons, privy or otherwise (ie a judgment binding the whole world) A party may rely on res judicata: as an estoppel to defeat an opponent’s claim or defence; and/or as the basis of their own claim or
The offence of causing grievous bodily harm with intent Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent can be tried solely in the Crown Court on indictment. Elements of the offence Under the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (OATPA 1861), the prosecution must establish that the defendant unlawfully and maliciously: wounded with the intention of causing GBH, or caused GBH with that intention, or wounded intending to resist or prevent the lawful arrest or detention of any person, or caused GBH intending to resist or prevent the lawful arrest or detention of any person ‘Unlawfully’ and ‘maliciously’ Unlawfully The wounding or causing of GBH must be unlawful. Such conduct may be lawful if used: in self-defence in defence of another in defence of property for the prevention of crime where the victim gave express or implied consent For further information on these defences, see below:
Most recent Practice notes
ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived, not updated, and is provided for background information only...
ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note is no longer updated and serves for background information only...
ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived, not updated, and offered solely for background information purposes...
ARCHIVED This Practice Note has been archived, is not updated, and for background information only...
ARCHIVED This Practice Note is archived, not maintained, and available purely for background information only...
ARCHIVED This archived Practice Note is not updated and serves solely as background information only...
ARCHIVED: This Practice Note rests on rules revoked on 1 April 2013 and is retained solely for historical reference purposes. Since the establishment of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court Costs Office is now styled the Senior Courts Costs Office. The companion guide has not yet been reissued, so it continues to be referred to as the Supreme Court Costs Office Guide at this time. Who applies for the hearing? It is the receiving party’s duty to seek the detailed assessment hearing. They may do this by filing a request for a detailed assessment hearing once the points of dispute have been served. The receiving party must lodge the request within 3 months of expiry of the period for commencing detailed assessment proceedings (as specified in the table at r 47.7 or by the court). How are the proceedings...
ARCHIVED This Practice Note is founded on provisions revoked on 1 April 2013 and is maintained for historical purposes only. It provides guidance solely on challenging the decision of an authorised court officer in detailed assessment proceedings, and does not extend to appeals against a detailed assessment decision made by a costs judge... Appeals from an authorised court officer in detailed assessment proceedings The process for appealing a decision by an authorised court officer in detailed assessment proceedings is contained in r 47.20–47.23 and CPR PD 47.1–48.4. Note: Part 52 does not apply to an appeal of a detailed assessment hearing from an authorised costs officer. The appeal lies to a costs judge or to a district judge of the High Court (r 47.21 and CPR PD 47, para 48.2). There is no need to obtain permission to appeal, nor to request written reasons ( CPR PD 47, para...
ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note is no longer updated and serves solely as background information...
ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is no longer updated and is for background information purposes only...
ARCHIVED This archived Practice Note is no longer updated and serves solely as background information...
ARCHIVED This Practice Note is archived and not maintained. Except where an appeal notice was lodged or permission to appeal was obtained before 1 October 2012, it is retained for historic purposes only. For guidance on the provisions currently in force, see Practice Note: Supreme Court—costs, fees and funding. Any rules and practice directions mentioned here will link to the present provisions rather than those effective before 1 October 2012. For the pre- October 2012 position, please refer to the attached pdf documents listed below. CPR 52 (old) CPR PD 52 (old) Costs generally The Court may make whatever order it considers just regarding the costs of any appeal or application for permission to appeal, either at the final determination of the appeal or application, or during the proceedings. Where permission to appeal is granted, the costs of the permission...
ARCHIVED : This retired Practice Note is no longer updated and exists solely for background information...
ARCHIVED This archived Practice Note is no longer updated and exists purely for background information...
ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note is not maintained and is supplied for background purposes only. In addition, some links may no longer direct to the provisions as they stood on the date this guidance was issued. For details of earlier and/or later amendments to the CPR, see: CPR updates—overview and Procedure Rule Committee minutes—overview. The changes appear in the Civil Procedure ( Amendments No 4) Rules 2015, SI 2015/1569 ( L20) and the 81st Update PD Making Document. Early Neutral Evaluation— CPR 3.1 Rule 3.1 on the court’s general case management powers has been revised to make clear that those powers extend to hearing an Early Neutral Evaluation. The justification for this alteration is recorded in the CPR Committee minutes of 12 June 2015. See Practice Note: Early neutral evaluation. Litigants in person—new CPR 3.1A A new rule 3.1A has been added, setting out how the court should...
ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note is no longer maintained and is supplied solely for background reading. In addition, certain links may not point to the provisions as they stood when this guidance was published. Note: this Practice Note deals solely with the provisions that took effect in April 2013. It does not address any later procedural amendments (to the CPR or any other procedural rules), nor does it cover the implementation or interpretation of the April 2013 updates (or any later changes). For commentary on the Jackson Reforms one year later and on subsequent CPR updates, see Practice Note: Jackson Reforms—one year on [ Archived] and CPR updates—overview. On 1 April 2013 the Jackson Reforms, among other changes, introduced new case management provisions; the principal measures are considered below. For general information on case management, see Case...
ARCHIVED : This retired Practice Note is no longer updated and exists solely for background information...
ARCHIVED This Practice Note is archived, not updated, and provided solely for background information purposes...
ARCHIVED: This Precedent is archived and is no longer maintained. NOTE: save where an appeal notice was filed, or permission to appeal obtained, before 1 October 2012, this practice note is for historical purposes only. For guidance on the current provisions governing the respondent’s notice, see Practice Note: Responding to an appellant’s notice—the respondent’s notice. Further, the CPR rules and practice directions referred to in this guidance link to the provisions now in force, and not those effective before 1 October 2012. For the pre‑ October 2012 provisions, please see the attached pdf documents: CPR 52 (old) CPR PD 52 (old) Responding to the appellant’s notice When should a response be made? In the majority of cases where an appellant’s notice exists, the respondent will be required to file a respondent’s notice. If the respondent takes no action, they may rely only on...
Archived: This Practice Note draws on provisions that were revoked on 1 April 2013. It is accordingly preserved for historical reference only. What is a statement of costs? For the court to properly evaluate the parties' expenditure, the party applying for a costs order against an opponent must produce a 'statement of costs' in Form N260. This document details every item of expenditure claimed in the application or action, covering the entirety of the matter. The particulars to be included in Form N260 are prescribed by Practice Direction 44, paragraph 13.5(2). Costs of producing the statement of costs In certain matters, preparing the statement can be time-consuming and detailed. Surprisingly, there is no authority determining whether the expense of compiling it is recoverable. Solicitor recovery of costs from the client It can be contended that such costs ought not to be recoverable at all, since a solicitor should in any event...
Popular documents
When evaluating a general damages claim, the practitioner ought initially to refer to the Judicial College Guidelines (JCG)...
This Practice Note This Practice Note reviews mechanisms used in settling litigation. A Tomlin order consists of a consent order paired with a schedule. It operates to stay proceedings on terms that have been agreed. The provisions contained in the schedule may remain confidential. This Practice Note describes the scope of confidentiality attaching to the schedule and sets out how it differs from a standard consent order. Sample wording for a Tomlin order is included, alongside links to precedents, as well as guidance on court approval. It also addresses varying, setting aside and enforcing a Tomlin order, including the considerations the court will take into account when handling applications for each. Further guidance is provided on interpreting and applying the relevant provisions of the CPR; however, some courts and divisions impose very specific requirements for both drafting and approval, and for approaching the schedule and confidentiality issues. Accordingly, you must consider the particular rules and court guide provisions in the forum where your claim is proceeding when drawing up the Tomlin order...
Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Landlord ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Landlord) [ name of Tenant ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Tenant) [ [ name of Guarantor ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Guarantor) ] [ [ name of Mortgagee ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) with its registered office at ] [ address ] (Mortgagee) ] Definitions Within this Deed, the terms below shall be interpreted as follows: [ Annual Rent • the annual sum reserved under the Lease; ] [ Insurance Rent • the Tenant’s share of the Landlord’s costs of insuring the Property (as set out in the Lease); ] Lease • the lease of the Property dated [ date ], entered into between (1) [ the Landlord OR [ name ...
I, [ name ], of [ address ], solemnly and sincerely state that: [ Matters to be verified, set out in numbered paragraphs ] I make this solemn statement in good conscience, believing it to be true, and pursuant to the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. DECLARED at [ details ] this [ day ] day of [ month and year ] Before me ................................................................................ [ signature of the person before whom the declaration is made ] A [ commissioner for oaths OR [ solicitor OR [ insert other qualification ] ] authorised to administer oaths ]...
Discover more from LexisNexis
