Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related Content
CASE STUDY

“LexisLibrary gives us the most relevant and recent cases and always has the latest information on them. It makes research so much easier. We're more cost-effective for our clients and more efficient each day”

Advocates

Access all documents on 130/30 fund

130/30 fund meaning

What does 130/30 fund mean?
A 130/30 fund is an equity fund using a long-short strategy: the manager shorts approximately 30% of the portfolio and uses the short‑sale proceeds to take about 130% long exposure, leaving net market exposure near 100% and gross exposure around 160%. The term is descriptive industry usage, not defined in legislation or case law. In the UK and Ireland, 130/30 strategies are commonly implemented either within UCITS (typically via derivatives to achieve synthetic shorts) or as alternative investment funds (AIFs) using physical shorting through prime brokerage. Key legal features include leverage and short‑selling controls, disclosure of global exposure and leverage (commitment or VaR), robust risk management, collateral and rehypothecation terms, and securities lending/prime brokerage documentation (e.g. ISDA, GMRA, GMSLA). Regulatory considerations include the UK Short Selling Regulation (UK) or EU Short Selling Regulation (Ireland), FCA rules (COLL/FUND) and Central Bank of Ireland UCITS/AIF Rulebook requirements. Prospectuses and constitutional documents must clearly describe the strategy, investment limits, benchmarks and risks, and set out borrowing, counterparty exposure and liquidity parameters. Usage and legal treatment are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about 130/30 fund

NEWS
Construction law weekly: Building Safety Act BLOs, Future Homes Standard, Approved Document B consultation, London housing measures, PFI guidance, CIS reforms, procurement updates—2 April 2026

In this issue: Building safety Procurement in construction Arbitration Planning in construction Infrastructure projects Tax for construction lawyers Construction industry news LexTalk®Construction: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Construction trackers Building safety Building liability orders—‘anticipatory’ orders and adjudication decisions (Crest Nicholson v Ardmore) In Crest Nicholson Regeneration Limited v Ardmore Construction Limited [2026] EWHC 789 (TCC), the TCC handed down what seems to be only the second judgment considering an applicant’s right to a building liability order (BLO) under section 130 of the Building Safety Act 2022. The applications arose from a dispute concerning fire safety and other defects at a residential scheme in Portsmouth. The applicants asked the court to grant: (i) ‘anticipatory’ BLOs against multiple defendants, making them jointly and severally liable for any liability the first defendant may ultimately be found to owe under section 1 of the Defective Premises Act 1972, or...

Read More Right Arrow