Action plan order meaning

In this issue: Investigating criminal conduct Criminal procedure and evidence Proceeds of crime Sentencing Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Consumer protection and cartels Cybercrime and data protection offences Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Insolvency offences and Companies Act offences Money laundering International Other corporate crime news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Investigating criminal conduct Standards of candour in closed hearings, and corporate witness statements (Attorney General v BBC; R (‘Beth’) v IPT) When scrutinising MI5’s actions across two High Court cases, the court addressed the grave consequences of presenting inaccurate material within closed hearings. It outlined the tightly confined situations that can justify a departure from open justice under section 6 of the Justice and Security Act 2013 (JSA 2013). The court further...

In this issue: Cross border criminal investigations Criminal procedure and evidence Proceeds of crime Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Cybercrime and data protection offences Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Insolvency Local authority prosecutions Money laundering Corporate Crime in Scotland Other corporate crime and crime related news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Cross border criminal investigations Companies should act as corporate enforcement develops. In late June 2025, SFO Director Nick Ephgrave met with Matthew Galeotti, head of the criminal division at the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and both reiterated a pledge to work together on prominent transnational investigations. Hayley Lund, partner, and Frankie Cowl, counsel, at Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, consider the UK’s shifting corporate enforcement landscape. See News Analysis: Companies must take action as...

In this issue: Key developments and materials Brexit Air pollution and climate change Contamination and environmental pollution Energy efficiency and buildings Product energy efficiency Energy for environmental lawyers Environmental assessment Environmental information Environmental taxes, reliefs and incentives ESG and sustainability Hazardous substances and chemicals Marine Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Waste Waste producer responsibility regimes Water, flooding and drainage Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content United Kingdom Environmental Law Association (UKELA) Annual Conference Key developments and materials Spending Review 2025—Key Energy and Environment announcements On 11 June 2025, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Rt Hon Rachel Reeves MP, set out to Parliament the government’s Spending Review 2025 (SR25). This News Analysis draws out announcements and commitments of significance to the energy and environment sectors. See News Analysis: Spending Review 2025—Key Energy and Environment announcements. 2025 UN Ocean Conference...

This Practice Note examines the principles governing the tort whereby a defendant deliberately interferes with a claimant’s rights in a judgment debt. For wider guidance on enforcing judgments, see: Introduction to enforcement—overview and related content. What is the Marex tort? The Marex tort describes a tort-based cause of action premised on an alleged intentional infringement of the claimant’s rights in a judgment debt. Its contours were first confirmed by Bryan J in 2021 in Lakatamia v Su, having been raised by Knowles J in 2017 in Marex v Garcia (also known as Marex v Sevilleja). See: Marex tort—history below. In Lakatamia v Su, Lakatamia pursued two claims against the defendants, Mr Su and his mother, Madam Su, including: unlawful means conspiracy—alleging a concerted plan to harm Lakatamia by unlawful means, through breaches of a 2011 worldwide freezing order in related Commercial Court proceedings against Mr Su (the Blair Freezing Order), by procuring the dissipation of two of Mr Son’s assets: the net sale proceeds...

Facts Mr Smith, aged 75, was recently bereaved after a 40-year marriage, having been diagnosed with dementia shortly before his wife passed away. He had already put in place a Lasting Power of Attorney naming his children and made a Will in their favour. He began spending time with his carer, Ms James, aged 34, who has progressively cut him off from relatives and friends. He often says he is busy and, when his family do see him, he appears not to be looking after himself or his home. His relatives are worried about the influence Ms James exerts, though they accept he has been lonely. Their concern heightened when, last week, Ms James declared they were going to marry, yet Mr Smith seems blissfully unaware of any such plan. What action can Mr Smith’s family take to keep him safe? Mental capacity They should first assess whether Mr Smith retains decision- and time-specific mental capacity, explain the situation to him, and seek his agreement to...

This Practice Note covers: the impact of an insolvency process on ongoing litigation where the debtor, bankrupt or insolvent company is a claimant or defendant how an insolvency process interacts with an arbitration agreement binding the debtor, bankrupt or insolvent company additional considerations in a cross-border setting Personal insolvency What happens when the bankrupt is a claimant in ongoing proceedings? The presentation of a bankruptcy petition, whether by a creditor or by the debtor, has no legal consequence for proceedings already on foot where the debtor is the claimant. Once a bankruptcy order is made and a trustee in bankruptcy (the trustee) is appointed, most causes of action in which the bankrupt has an interest vest in the trustee under section 306 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). In such circumstances, it is the trustee, rather than the bankrupt, who has standing to carry on the claim. The trustee will proceed only if that course best serves the interests...

1 Introduction This record of our fire safety arrangements and evacuation plan sets out how we control and manage the hazards identified in our fire risk assessment. It further outlines the actions, plans and procedures to follow should a fire occur, including our arrangements for the safe evacuation or escape from our workspace(s)... 2 Responsibility 2.1 The person[s] with overarching responsibility for fire safety, and the responsible person(s) in accordance with our duties under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (as amended by section 156 of the Building Safety Act 2022) [ is OR are ]: Name: [ Insert name ] Role/job title: [ Insert role/job title ] Contact details (including UK-based address): [ Insert details or details of where this information can be found ] Name: [ Insert name ] Role/job title: [ Insert role/job title ] Contact details (including UK-based address): [ Insert details or details of where...

This presentation is intended for a strategy away day and mirrors the running order set out in the Precedents for the Strategy away day—programme and the Strategy away day—pack index. It is designed to dovetail with the rest of the Strategic planning subtopic and works on the basis that you have already completed the following preliminary steps from Precedent: Strategy—action plan and timeline, namely: Stage 1: Begin the strategic review process; set a date for a strategy away day (allow at least 12 weeks)...