Adjudication meaning

Created in collaboration with 4 Pump Court. This Checklist highlights several principal matters a responding party ought to review on receiving a Notice of Adjudication. That review includes assessing whether grounds exist for a jurisdictional objection—if they do, the responding party must take particular actions so as not to forfeit its ability to advance the objection (either within the adjudication or later at enforcement). Further direction on jurisdiction can be found in Practice Notes: Grounds for a jurisdictional challenge in an adjudication and Making a jurisdictional challenge. Are there possible grounds to dispute the adjudicator’s jurisdiction? Initial points to consider include: the contract: is there a contract between the parties to the adjudication and has it been properly identified in the Notice of Adjudication? See Practice Note: The Notice of Adjudication (What should the Notice of Adjudication contain?) have the correct contracting parties been stated in the Notice of Adjudication? entitlement to adjudicate: ...

This checklist flags matters often needing attention before a party refers a dispute to adjudication. It also points to detailed, in-depth guidance on the various topics and identifies the relevant provisions of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996) where appropriate, as well. Legal matters Confirm there is a lawful basis to refer the dispute to adjudication, including whether it has crystallised and falls within the class of disputes that may properly be adjudicated. Entitlement to refer a dispute to adjudication The referring party must hold a legal entitlement to refer a dispute to adjudication. That entitlement may arise under statute, under the contract, or by an ad hoc agreement between the parties. Accordingly, consider the following: Is there a statutory right—does the parties’ contract meet the definition of ‘construction contract’ under HGCRA 1996, s 104 and is it not otherwise excluded from its scope? See Practice Note: What is a construction contract under the...

This checklist outlines, in brief, the principal tasks and responsibilities that will usually fall to the buyer’s lawyers (and, in some instances, the seller’s lawyers) after completion of a private M&A acquisition where the target is a company incorporated in England & Wales. Once completion has occurred, the SPA should be reviewed carefully so the parties’ lawyers can accurately diarise the agreed matters, especially any deadlines, by reference to the parties’ specific post-completion obligations. As a result, although this checklist points to actions that are commonly required, every deal is different and the list cannot be comprehensive... Issue Guidance Registration of share transfers Buyer’s lawyers: Lodge with the Stamp Office the stock transfer form(s) (or a declaration of trust—see note below) relating to the target’s shares, for adjudication and payment of any stamp duty/transfer taxes (within 30 days of execution) Update the register of members of the target company (and any subsidiaries) Where applicable, update the people with significant control (PSC) register (CA...

In this issue: Adjudication Building safety Planning Litigation Construction industry news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Construction trackers Adjudication Contractual interpretation in adjudication disputes (Dawnvale v Hylgar) In Dawnvale Cafe Components Ltd v Hylgar Properties Ltd [2024] EWHC 1199 (TCC), the court reviewed the reach of a Tomlin Order/Settlement Agreement concluded after settling enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision, and assessed whether its wording barred a proposed second adjudication. It also had to determine if that proposed reference raised a dispute already resolved by the first adjudication. This ruling underlines the need for exact drafting in settlement agreements and the prospect of further claims where matters are not expressly concluded. Written by Michael O’Connor, partner at Charles Russell Speechly LLP. See News Analysis: Contractual interpretation in adjudication disputes (Dawnvale v Hylgar). Building safety Building liability orders: court gives guidance on procedures in first reported case (Wilmott Dixon v Prater) ...

Bellway Homes Limited v Surgo Construction Limited [2024] EWHC 10 (TCC) What are the practical implications of this case? In adjudications governed by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996), a party is permitted to place only one dispute before the adjudicator (HGCRA 1996, s 108(1)). Where more than one dispute is advanced, the adjudicator has no jurisdiction to proceed (Fastrack v Morrison). This decision is the first to address whether a payee’s interim payment claim that proceeds on two alternative footings—(i) the true valuation of the works and/or (ii) entitlement to the sum applied for because no valid payment or pay less notice was served (often termed a ‘smash and grab’ claim)—should be treated as a single dispute. The court concluded that it is one dispute, with the consequence that an adjudicator has jurisdiction to consider both bases within the same reference. The outcome will be of real importance to parties engaged in interim payment contests, as it confirms that valuation and notice-default arguments...

1st Formations Ltd v Lapp Industries Ltd [2025] EWHC 1526 (TCC) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision underscores that the courts will adopt a common-sense, pragmatic approach to the content of a payee’s notice under the HGCRA 1996 and Part II of the Scheme for Construction Contracts (the Scheme), resisting unduly narrow readings. So long as the notice makes sufficiently clear what sum is sought and the footing for the claim, the court will not seek to interfere or hunt for defects that might render the notice void or ineffectual. Here, the payee’s documents were plainly recognisable as an interim application; they identified the amount asserted as due and the basis upon which that figure had been worked out. The TCC further confirmed that a payment notice is not invalid merely because it asks for a figure below the amount stated as due. If a payment notice includes an incorrect due date, that is an issue for the other party to pick up in...

This Practice Note offers a beginner’s overview of construction disputes, intended for trainee solicitors and others unfamiliar with the area. It outlines what a construction disputes lawyer does, the disputes that frequently occur on projects, and gives a primer on adjudication, dispute boards, proceedings in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC), construction arbitration and alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It also considers the nature of disputes that routinely emerge on construction projects and the role undertaken by the disputes lawyer. We suggest reading Practice Note: Construction law—new starter guide, which sets out the core principles of construction law and the characteristics of construction projects, before tackling this note. The content of this Practice Note is also available as a PowerPoint deck with speaker notes—see: Introduction to construction disputes—training materials. You might also consider Practice Note: Dispute Resolution—new starter guide, which addresses dispute resolution more broadly. The work of a construction disputes lawyer Construction lawyers handling disputes (often described as contentious or back-end practice) are typically asked to support clients...

Prepared in collaboration with 4 Pump Court, this Practice Note condenses the choices open to a party aiming to stop enforcement of an adjudication decision, while also signposting grounds the court has dismissed or rejected. The courts adopt a pro-enforcement stance towards adjudication outcomes and, as set out below, the instances in which a decision will not be enforced (or a stay of execution will be ordered) are tightly constrained. Summary of grounds for resisting enforcement The court will refrain from enforcing an adjudicator’s decision, or grant a stay of execution, only in narrowly defined situations: the adjudicator lacked jurisdiction (see Practice Note: Grounds for a jurisdictional challenge in an adjudication) there was a serious or material breach of natural justice in the adjudication (see Practice Note: Breach of natural justice in adjudication) the referring party is insolvent and/or there is a risk of dissipation of the awarded sum (see Practice Note: Adjudication—resisting enforcement using a stay of execution) fraud occurred during...

MF/2 MF/2 sits within the IET and Institution of Mechanical Engineers’ suite of Model Forms. It is intended for domestic (UK) or international agreements dealing solely with the supply of electrical, electronic or mechanical plant, and its full name is MF/2 Model Form of General Conditions of Contract for use in connection with home or overseas contracts for the supply of electrical, electronic or mechanical plant. The core terms have remained unchanged since 1999, save for amendment slips addressing the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (C(RTP)A 1999) and proposals to align it with MF/1 revision 5. Depending on the contractor’s scope and site characteristics, MF/2 can amount to a contract for ‘construction operations’ and fall within the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996). It contains no adjudication provision and its payment terms do not satisfy those statutory controls—such provisions would need to be added by adapting comparable wording from MF/1. See Practice Notes: What is a construction contract under the HGCRA 1996? ...

[ NAME OF PROJECT ]: REFERENCE OF A DISPUTE TO THE DAAB UNDER CLAUSE 21.4 DAAB Reference No. DAAB Reference No. [ Number of reference ] | [ Date ] Referring Party [ Name of Party 1 ] [ Address ] [ Telephone/Fax No. ] [ Email address ] [ ON THE HEADED NOTEPAPER OF THE REFERRING PARTY ] Responding Party [ Name of Party 2 ] [ Address ] [ Telephone/Fax No. ] [ Email address ] The DAAB [ Name of DAAB Chairperson ] — [ Address ] — [ Telephone/Fax No. ] — [ Email address ] [ Name of DAAB Member 2 ] — [ Address ] — [ Telephone/Fax No. ] — [ Email address ] [ Name of DAAB Member 3 ] — [ Address ] — [ Telephone/Fax No. ] — [ Email address ] ...

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract Without Quantities for use in Scotland 2016 published by the SBCC subject to the following amendments: Recitals and Articles updated: contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; CDP responsibility accepted; Principal Contractor duties priced; arbitration deleted; Schedule of Amendments prevails; Third Party Agreements duties. Contract Particulars: arbitration entries removed; Rectification Period set at 12 months; fluctuations and certain PII/guarantee entries deleted. Conditions: key definitions revised (Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design sub‑contractors, Funder, Site); Scottish jurisdiction; approvals mean principles only; entire agreement; variations in writing. Design/materials/programming: contractor accepts ER/CP; quality and non‑deleterious materials; programme reporting; site risk; drawings/info supply; tighter discrepancy notices. Time/defects: mitigate and advise on delay; narrower Relevant Events; Practical Completion clarified; stronger rectification, consequential damage and indemnity; phased as‑built/occupation information. IP/confidentiality/BIM: broader licence, moral rights waivers and delivery; confidentiality reinforced; BIM where adopted. Management/sub‑contracting: access, approved Site Manager, meetings; prescribed sub‑contracts; collateral warranties/third‑party rights; CDM duties; insurance...

In respect of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, and in respect of an adjudication before [ Name of Adjudicator ] between [ Name of party 1 ], the Referring Party, and [ Name of party 2 ], the Responding Party Referral notice Introduction In accordance with the Notice of Adjudication dated [ date ], this document serves as the Referring Party’s Referral Notice. This Referral Notice is issued with a Bundle that contains a timeline of events alongside pertinent documents: 2.1 chronology of relevant events at tab [ insert ] 2.2 [ insert ] at tab [ insert ] 2.3 [ insert ] at tab [ insert ] The Parties 3 The Referring Party is [ Full Name of Party 1 ] ([ ‘Abbreviated Name of Party 1’ ]) of [ address ], and [ provides OR undertakes ] [ insert services/role Party 1 carries...

Yes, bank holidays are excluded when calculating the time period in an adjudication under the Scheme for Construction Contracts. The Scheme for Construction Contracts (the Scheme) sets out certain default rules governing the entitlement to start, and the practical management of, an adjudication process. Under section 108(5) of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996), the Scheme’s terms are read into a construction contract where it omits, or conflicts with, any of the obligations in subsections 108(1) to (4)...

Retention Retention describes the portion of interim payments the employer withholds as security for the contractor’s future performance of its duties and to encourage the contractor to discharge those duties in full and properly. For further details, consult the Practice Note: Retention of payment in construction contracts. When retention is to be released to the contractor depends on the particular contract terms for the project. Typically, half of the retained sum is paid out at practical completion, with the balance thereafter following completion of any remedial works for defects reported within the defects liability period. Consequently, if these milestones are reached before the final certificate is issued, the contractor may have a right to seek payment of some or all of the retention...