Administrator meaning

General checklist What follows is a checklist highlighting matters that a solicitor representing a company’s administrator (and, in some pre-appointment cases, the directors/company) disposing of a business and its assets ought to bear in mind when preparing a sale and purchase agreement (the Agreement). This checklist is suitable for both pre-pack scenarios and sales of the business and/or assets completed after administrators are in office. It is not comprehensive and, depending on the nature of the business, numerous additional points may arise. For further detail, see: Sale and Purchase of Assets—overview and Pre-packs—overview. We also, at points, refer to seeking information from the directors. That will not invariably be feasible, eg where the situation is hostile. Accordingly, if the directors are engaged, they should be able to provide the information and will often be best placed to do so; however, where the position is hostile, or if you act solely for the administrators, any enquiries should be directed to the administrators, or at least channelled via them to the...

Administrator appointed by the court Where the court appoints an administrator under paragraph 11 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), following an application by the company, its directors and/or one or more creditors, the title deeds should include certified copies of: the administration order; and any further order(s) under IA 1986, Sch B1, paras 91–95 appointing a new administrator after the death, resignation or removal from office of the original or any later administrator Administrator appointed by holder(s) of qualifying charge, the company or its directors Where the administrator is appointed by the holder(s) of a qualifying floating charge (IA 1986, Sch B1, para 14) or by the company or its directors (IA 1986, Sch B1, para 22), the title deeds should include certified copies of: the notice of appointment: in a form complying with IA 1986, Sch B1, para 14 and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules...

Appointment flowchart This Checklist explains the actions the directors or the company must take to appoint an administrator via the out-of-court route under paragraph 22 of Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). Several criteria must be satisfied and specific steps completed. For fuller guidance, refer to these Practice Notes, to be read alongside this Checklist: Out-of-court administrator appointments—who can appoint and in what circumstances? Out-of-court administration appointments by a company or its directors—the procedure For a snapshot, the flowchart below outlines the core steps. It assumes the company is not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), although the Checklist does include the extra actions needed where regulation applies. Appointment checklist Step/action — Time (days) — Section/rule Pre-appointment If the company is to make the appointment, it may either pass a written resolution or convene a general meeting to vote to appoint an administrator by ordinary resolution......

Original news Mr T (CAS-64304-R5R1)—14 April 2025 Summary The Pensions Ombudsman dismissed a complaint concerning the distribution of death benefits from a pension scheme. It concluded the scheme administrator’s decision was reasonable, neither irrational nor perverse. The complainant was not named in a supposed will—which was invalid as it lacked witnesses—and was the sole beneficiary of the late member’s estate. Before deciding, the administrator carried out extensive enquiries. This outcome serves as a reminder that trustees and administrators of pension schemes should undertake appropriate enquiries when determining death benefit payments. What were the facts? Mr S was a member of the AJ Bell You Invest Self invested Personal Pension Plan (the Scheme). Following his death, he was survived by, among others, Mr T. Mr T had entered into a civil partnership with Mr S...

Sammut (on his behalf and as administrator of the Estate of Paul Sammut) and others v Next Steps Mental Healthcare Ltd (formerly K Bond Healthcare Ltd t/a Next Steps) and another [2024] EWHC 2265 (KB) What are the practical implications of this case? The result of the case exposes an anomaly stemming from YL v Birmingham City [2007] UKHL 27, and the subsequent, partial legislative rollback of that ruling’s effect in defined categories of situation across specified cases (originally through section 145 Health and Social Care Act 2008 (HSCA 2008), now replaced by the current provision CA 2014, s 73). In YL, the House of Lords, by a majority, determined that private care home operators and providers delivering community care were not performing a public function for the purposes of HRA 1998, s 6(3)(b). Significantly, the majority drew a distinction between community care and mental health detention; in the latter context, the deployment of special statutory powers of detention was the decisive characteristic, such that the function was ‘of...

Original news Mr Y (CAS-57893-P0C6)—20 August 2025 / Ms R (CAS-58612-P1X1)—18 July 2025 Summary The Pensions Ombudsman dismissed a complaint concerning a loan note investment. The scheme’s independent trustee bore no responsibility for losses arising from this high-risk, speculative asset. The complainants had completed forms confirming the trustee was not giving investment advice and could not be held accountable for any investment loss. The arrangement ran on an execution-only basis. The trustee also undertook appropriate due diligence before proceeding. In light of these factors, no liability ultimately attached to the trustee for the loan note loss. The determination highlights the perils of placing funds into non-standard investments. Accordingly, the complaint failed. What were the facts? Ms R and Mr Y were members of the Westerby Pension Scheme (the Scheme). The Scheme was a self-directed, self-invested personal pension (SIPP) scheme. Westerby Trustee Services Limited (Westerby) was the Scheme’s independent trustee and administrator...

The extended producer responsibility (EPR) regime for packaging and packaging waste The extended producer responsibility (EPR) regime for packaging and packaging waste shifts the entire cost of managing household packaging waste from households to packaging producers, placing on them accountability for their packaging costs throughout its lifecycle. Lower charges apply to sustainable packaging, incentivising designs that use fewer materials and are easier to recycle. Under EPR, Local Authorities (LAs) receive producer-funded payments covering the net costs of collecting, managing, recycling and disposing of this household packaging waste. EPR is governed by the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024, SI 2024/1332 (as amended). These regulations define a range of persons and bodies with specific functions within the regime. These are: producers—these are the principal duty holders compliance schemes the Scheme Administrator (SA) (PackUK) ‘relevant authorities’ which are LAs as household waste collection and disposal authorities responsible for household waste services reprocessors and exporters the ‘appropriate agency’—in England, the Environment...

The official receiver (OR) is designated as trustee in bankruptcy (trustee) or as liquidator to manage and investigate every bankruptcy and court-ordered winding up, including those of partnerships. The Secretary of State or the creditors may, in place of the OR, appoint an insolvency practitioner (IP) to act as trustee for personal insolvencies or as liquidator for corporate cases. Under the Insolvency Regulations 1994, SI 1994/2507, as amended (the Regulations), the OR or IP, as appropriate, is obliged to pay into the (ISA) any funds they receive while administering all bankruptcies and compulsory liquidations. Before 1 October 2011, sums from voluntary liquidations could also be lodged in the ISA; now, only unclaimed dividends in a voluntary liquidation may be paid into the ISA. Likewise, unclaimed dividends arising in an administration or an administrative receivership may be paid into the ISA once the company has been dissolved. The Regulations also permit payments out of the ISA for disbursements, expenses and distributions to creditors and, in a liquidation, to contributories, or, in...

Sound administration underpins the smooth operation of a pension scheme and the delivery of good member outcomes, not least because administrators are typically members’ first port of call; consequently, their effectiveness, consistency and accuracy indeed strongly influence member experience and results. In short, administration counts because it is the usual locus of pension governance, safeguarding data accuracy, regulatory compliance and correct member outcomes being delivered on a consistent basis. What is a scheme administrator? For the purposes of this Practice Note, ‘scheme administrator’ means the individual or entity that supports the scheme’s day-to-day running by planning, managing and performing its administrative tasks. This can be an external provider, a dedicated internal team within the employer and/or the employer’s human resources or finance functions and departments. This usage is different from the ‘scheme administrator’ in Part 4 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004), denoting the person or persons who ensure the scheme meets FA 2004 requirements in full. In practice, that statutory capacity is...

Precedent Transfer An editable Word edition of the TR1 precedent can be obtained via the link directly on this page, downloaded, then saved or printed if and when needed. Drafting notes to precedent transfer – General: Any mention of ‘Panels’ in these drafting notes relates to the panels in HM Land Registry form TR1. TR1 is the prescribed instrument for transferring the entirety of freehold or leasehold land under the Land Registration Rules 2003. The form may likewise be used to transfer the whole of unregistered land where the disposition triggers compulsory registration, or where the transferee intends to submit a voluntary application for registration...

This note sets out clear, broad guidance on what to do straight after a death and outlines the standard probate process for lay personal representatives and grieving close relatives. See the Probate—client guide as well. A probate practitioner can offer bespoke advice suited to your particular situation and circumstances. Coping with a loved one’s death brings numerous difficulties, emotional as well as practical. If you are a personal representative (PR) formally handling the estate—the assets and belongings of the person who has died—as an executor or administrator, you may encounter an unfamiliar role with jargon that feels odd and confusing. In the days after a death, various practical matters can arise, sometimes unexpectedly and at short notice. This guidance is designed to help you decide what requires prompt attention and what can sensibly wait for the coming weeks. Taking time off work Following the death of a dependant, you may take unpaid time away from work to organise and attend the funeral. You should tell your employer...

This Agreement is made on [ insert day and month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties [ Insert name of company in administration ] (in administration), being a company incorporated in [ England and Wales OR [ insert country of incorporation ] ], with registered number [ insert company number ], and having its registered office at [ insert address ] (the Seller), acting through its [ joint ] Administrator(s) [ Insert name of administrator(s) ] of [ insert name of firm ], whose registered office is at [ insert address of firm ] (the Administrator(s)) [ insert name of purchasing corporate entity ], a company duly incorporated in [ England and Wales OR [ insert country of incorporation ] ], with registered number [ insert company number ], and with its registered office address at [ insert address ] (the Buyer); and each of the Seller Administrator(s) and the Buyer being a Party, and together the Seller Administrator(s) and the Buyer being the...

In this Q&A, we assume that B’s claim is smaller than A’s. Legal process against the company Under paragraph 43(2) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the moratorium prevents any legal process—covering legal proceedings, execution, distress and diligence—from being started or continued against the company or its property without the administrator’s consent or the court’s permission. This wording is wide enough to encompass any remaining actions or steps that might otherwise be taken against the company or its property. Accordingly, B can only bring an action against A with the approval of the administrator or the leave of the court. The purpose of the moratorium (and the interim moratorium) is to safeguard the company and its assets from creditor action during the company’s administration and the pre-appointment period. It bars any steps, actions or processes from being begun or carried on against the company and its property, save with the administrator’s consent (if one is appointed) or the court’s permission. See Practice...

This Q&A This Q&A explores the steps administrators should take to contest a landlord’s attempt to forfeit a lease by peaceable re-entry, carried out unaware of an interim moratorium triggered by lodging a notice of intention to appoint administrators (NOI). An NOI is to be lodged by the directors or the company in advance of making an out of court appointment pursuant to Schedule B1, paragraph 22, of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). This Q&A does not address a case where no NOI has been lodged. Where a company or its directors intend to appoint an administrator via the out of court route, they begin by filing an NOI, which imposes an interim moratorium under IA 1986, Sch B1, paras 44(2), 44(4). After the NOI is placed before the court, notice must also be served on the ‘prescribed persons’, including any party known to have levied distress against the company or its assets (Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, SI 2016/1024, r 3.23(4); IA 1986, Sch B1, para...

When one company advances funds to another, the contractual provisions govern any restriction on repaying the loan before the ten-year period first contemplated. Should the lending company enter liquidation or administration, that circumstance, by itself, does not alter the contract’s terms. The office-holding insolvency practitioner should nevertheless review the agreement to determine whether it permits earlier repayment, or repayment on alternative terms, if the lending company goes into liquidation or administration. Although that may appear improbable, it remains possible, and the officeholder ought to explore every avenue to secure accelerated repayment of the borrowing. Absent an express clause to the contrary, the insolvency of the lender does not, of itself, accelerate the debt, and timing remains governed by the bargain. It would seem that the office-holding insolvency practitioner holds an appointment that must remain open for at least ten years before the loan can be discharged and a dividend distributed to creditors...