Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“We have to become more agile as our clients' expectations and requirements change. The only thing we know is that tomorrow is going to be different and we must be prepared. With LexisNexis, I feel more confident of that we're ready every time.”

Wolverhampton County Council

Access all documents on ADSL2+

ADSL2+ meaning

What does ADSL2+ mean?
In legal practice, adsl2+ describes a copper‑based fixed broadband service delivered over the public switched telephone network using the ITU‑T G.992.5 digital subscriber line (DSL) standard. The term is used in telecommunications contracts, SLAs, wholesale access agreements and consumer terms to identify the service type and speed profile. It is an asymmetric technology that increases downstream capacity by using higher frequencies than ADSL/ADSL2 on the copper pair. Typical performance is up to about 24 Mbit/s downstream and around 1 Mbit/s upstream, highly dependent on line length and quality. ADSL2+ is not defined in legislation or case law; it is a descriptive technical term referenced in regulatory materials (e.g., Ofcom and ComReg market reviews). Legal relevance commonly includes: product and service descriptions; minimum guaranteed speeds and remedies; equipment compatibility; local loop unbundling (LLU) and line sharing; fault thresholds and service levels; migration/upgrade obligations and any copper withdrawal or cessation charges; and advertising or misrepresentation issues about achievable speeds. Usage is broadly consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. ADSL2+ is now generally treated as a legacy copper broadband product relative to FTTC/VDSL and FTTP but remains prevalent in existing portfolios and disputes.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about ADSL2+

NEWS
Service out, Altimo and full and frank disclosure: Okuashvili guidance on CPR 6.33(2B)(b), material non-disclosure and forum in England and Wales

Okuashvili and others companies v Ivanishvili and others; Allied Global Tobacco Ltd and others v JSC Tbilisi Tobacco and others [2025] EWHC 829 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This judgment functions as a thorough digest of the legal principles governing jurisdictional challenges—especially the test in Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel [2011] UKPC 7—while also providing practitioners with useful clarity on the court’s handling of alleged breaches of the duty of full and frank disclosure in without notice applications. In this matter, the court held that the failure to draw its attention to a series of ‘ inherent problems with the case ’—stemming from the fact that many of the asserted claims were time-barred under the applicable law—led to a picture being presented to the master that was ‘ a world away ’ from the true position...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
TMT weekly update: AI governance, Online Safety Act thresholds and deepfake offences, CMA digital markets guidance, data protection opinions, advertising enforcement, and recent case law—9 January 2025

In this issue: New technologies Information technology Internet Data protection Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Reputation management LexTalk®TMT: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information New technologies iQIYI brings a landmark copyright claim against Chinese AI start-up MiniMax. According to MLex, the China-based video-streaming service has filed proceedings in a local court, accusing the domestic artificial intelligence start-up of infringement linked to AI model training and content production. See: iQIYI sues Chinese AI startup MiniMax for copyright infringement in landmark case. MLex has learned. Appeal Tracker: Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Ltd In Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 825, the Supreme Court granted permission to appeal on 29 November 2024. Earlier, the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) upheld the hearing officer’s appeal from...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK and EU life sciences regulatory update: AI Act guidance and GDPR interplay, MHRA risk minimisation, HRA transparency, EMA/ICH guidelines, viral testing standards, and hub‑and‑spoke dispensing

In this issue: Medical devices Pharmaceuticals—regulatory framework Post-market Research and development Commercialisation Daily and weekly news alerts Trackers Useful information Medical devices Navigating EU AI Regulation in 2025—key developments and strategic implications for business As the first elements of the EU AI Act take effect, the European Commission has released guidance, introduced compliance support tools, and signalled robust enforcement. In parallel, it has withdrawn the proposed EU AI Liability Directive and presented the AI Continent Plan to strengthen Europe’s AI infrastructure and data ecosystem. This article sets out the principal updates and actionable insights for business leaders preparing for the next phase of AI regulation. Written by Barry Scannell, partner at William Fry and member of the Irish government’s AI Advisory Council. See News Analysis: Navigating EU AI Regulation in 2025—key developments and strategic implications for business. Main challenges of EU AI Act-GDPR interplay identified by Member States MLex: EU Member States cite...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about ADSL2+

PRACTICE NOTES
Section 9(2B) and GMP transfers post-6 April 2016: individual/bulk routes, consent rules, receiving scheme eligibility, connected employer transfers, 2017/2018 reforms and GMP equalisation considerations

Contracting-out on a salary-related basis (also known as defined benefit (DB) contracting-out) was abolished on 6 April 2016. Before abolition, members of contracted-out salary-related (COSR) schemes could have built up one of two forms of contracted-out entitlement. In this Practice Note, these are collectively described as ‘contracted-out salary-related rights’ or, in short, ‘COSR rights’. Guaranteed minimum pensions (GMPs), being contracted-out rights built up before 6 April 1997 Section 9(2B) rights (also called post-1997 contracted-out salary-related rights or post-1997 COSR rights), being contracted-out rights built up between 6 April 1997 and 5 April 2016 The framework for transferring COSR rights is prescribed by the Contracting-out (Transfer and Transfer Payment) Regulations 1996, SI 1996/1462 (the Contracting-out Transfer Regulations). HMRC has issued guidance on transferring COSR rights. This Practice Note addresses transfers carried out after the end of DB contracting-out, namely on and from 6 April 2016. For material on transfers of COSR rights made prior to the abolition of DB contracting-out, see Practice...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Buy-out of contracted-out DB rights before 6 April 2016: Section 9(2B) and GMPs—discharge, consent, cessation, wind-up, insurer criteria, HMRC and equalisation

This Practice Note concentrates on the matters that applied prior to 6 April 2016—the date on which salary-related contracting-out (often called DB contracting-out) was brought to an end—when buying out these contracted-out salary-related (COSR) entitlements: guaranteed minimum pensions (GMPs)—the benefits built up by COSR scheme members as a result of contracting out between 6 April 1978 and 5 April 1997 Section 9(2B) rights (also referred to as post-1997 COSR rights)—the benefits accrued by COSR scheme members as a result of contracting out between 6 April 1997 and 5 April 2016 The legislative requirements that applied differed according to whether the relevant contracted-out rights were GMPs or Section 9(2B) rights. For guidance on the buy-out considerations from 6 April 2016 for Section 9(2B) rights and GMPs, see Practice Note: Buying out Section 9(2B) rights and GMPs from 6 April 2016. For general issues relating to buy-outs, see Practice Note: De-risking—pension buy-outs and buy-ins. For information on the ending of DB contracting-out on 6 April...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Family Procedure Rules 2010 (England and Wales): Index to Parts, Practice Directions, amendments (Brexit/DDSA 2020), electronic procedure, pilot schemes and pre-DDSA 2020 versions

How to use this index This Practice Note offers an index with links to the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955—the main procedural rules that apply to family proceedings—together with all supporting Practice Directions. Use the 'Table of Contents' tab on the left-hand side of the screen; it will expand to reveal every Part of FPR 2010 and the associated Practice Directions for each individual Part. To open material within FPR 2010, select the margin note to the right of the text for the specific Part or Practice Direction you wish to consult. When you are inside a Part of FPR 2010, click the 'Table of Contents' tab on the left to then expand that Part, display all rules contained in it, and allow you to navigate to the relevant provision you are interested in or require. Within FPR 2010, the 'Table of Contents' tab also lists all other Parts of FPR 2010, and individual rules can be navigated to by clicking on each relevant...

Read More Right Arrow