Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up.”

Southampton FC

Access all documents on Advance percentage

Advance percentage meaning

What does Advance percentage mean?
The advance percentage is the proportion of the value of specified eligible assets that an asset-based lender will lend under an ABL facility. It is set in the facility agreement and applied in the borrowing base to determine availability. It is a market term (also called the advance rate), not defined by legislation or case law in England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland or Ireland. Advance percentages typically differ by asset class (for example, eligible trade receivables, inventory, plant and machinery or real estate) and are applied after eligibility criteria, dilutions, concentration limits and other haircuts. They are commonly subject to reserves, appraisal‑driven loan‑to‑value caps and lender discretion to vary following field exams, performance triggers or an event of default. Borrowers apply the agreed percentages in periodic borrowing base certificates to evidence funding capacity. Usage is broadly consistent across the UK and Ireland; any jurisdictional differences usually concern creation, perfection and enforcement of security rather than the calculation concept. The term appears in ABL documentation to allocate risk and liquidity and to calibrate availability, covenants and pricing.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Advance percentage

NEWS
UK whistleblower rewards imminent: Fisher Review, HMRC informant programme and SFO advocacy foreshadow reform and increased corporate misconduct and enforcement risk

As the SFO's drive for whistleblower incentives gathers momentum, corporations should consider the implications for managing misconduct risk On 22 April 2025, the Home Office unveiled the second part of Jonathan Fisher KC’s fraud offences review, the first independent examination of UK fraud law since 1986. Spanning six phases of the fraud lifecycle, the opening phase features an in-depth appraisal of rewards for criminal informants and whistleblowers. The Fisher review is anticipated to be pivotal to the Labour government’s fraud agenda, offering the SFO a key platform to advance incentives reform within government. Soon after the announcement, the SFO stated it would liaise with the Fisher Review team to set out its case for change. These moves followed HM Treasury’s March 2025 commitment to introduce a fresh informants’ scheme aimed at tackling serious tax non-compliance, with a focus on major corporates. The Treasury made clear the model will mirror US-style whistleblower incentives programmes, granting informants a fixed percentage of tax recovered. The precise rate, together with further particulars, is...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Advance percentage

PRACTICE NOTES
Retention in Construction Contracts: Legal Framework, JCT/NEC/FIDIC Positions, Trust Treatment, Release, Supply Chain Risks, Retention Bonds and Reform Proposals

What is retention? Holding back a retention from interim payments is a common feature of commercial construction contracts, particularly those using standard forms. Retention describes the portion of each interim payment an employer withholds as security for the contractor’s future performance and as an incentive to ensure every obligation is fulfilled. A set percentage is deducted from each payment; this amount is referred to as the ‘retention’ (or ‘retentions’). This approach is often mirrored down the supply chain—for example, a main contractor may retain sums from a sub-contractor. The arrangement facilitates part-payment as the works advance, while postponing the balance until all contractual duties are completed. In addition to promoting completion of the works, the retained funds can be used to pay for correcting defects where the contractor is in default under the contract. How much retention is retained? Retention levels can be as high as around 10%. On larger projects, the figure is more commonly between 3–5% (although some public sector clients adopt a policy of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Contributory negligence in personal injury and clinical negligence (England and Wales): LR(CN)A 1945, fault, causation and apportionment; seat belts, helmets, children, road traffic accidents and workplace claims

Contributory negligence Contributory negligence operates as a partial defence that may result in a reduction of damages. Other defences can be relevant too. See Practice Notes: Did the claimant consent to the risk of injury? and Was the claimant involved in an illegal activity? Where a defendant intends to advance contributory negligence, they must allege, plead, and prove that the claimant played a part in their own injury by failing to exercise all reasonable care for their personal safety. Section 1(1) of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 provides, in essence, that if damage arises partly through the claimant’s fault and partly through the fault of another, the claim is not defeated by the claimant’s fault; instead, the damages recoverable are to be reduced to the extent the court considers just and equitable, having regard to the claimant’s share of responsibility. Courts record any finding of contributory negligence as a proportion—stated as a percentage or fraction—of the damages. The exercise involves comparing the respective fault...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Liquidator remuneration and expenses in CVL, MVL and compulsory winding up: approval, SIP 9, fee estimates, challenges and ranking (England and Wales)

How is a liquidator’s remuneration determined? Remuneration for an insolvency office-holder (in whatever capacity they are appointed) is determined under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024. In addition, office-holders should have regard to the Statements of Insolvency Practice (SIPs), which provide guidance on the basis of remuneration to be used. Any court considering the question of office-holder remuneration will apply part six of the Practice Direction on Insolvency Proceedings (PDIP), and this should also be taken into account by office-holders in practice. Fees can be fixed either: as a percentage of the value of the assets which are realised, distributed or both realised and distributed by reference to the time properly spent by the office-holder and the office-holder’s staff in attending to matters arising in the liquidation as a set (fixed) amount, or as a combination of all three In a members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL), it is...

Read More Right Arrow