Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“LexisLibrary gives us the most relevant and recent cases and always has the latest information on them. It makes research so much easier. We're more cost-effective for our clients and more efficient each day”

Advocates

Access all documents on All-Scotland jurisdiction

All-Scotland jurisdiction meaning

What does All-Scotland jurisdiction mean?
In practice, all-Scotland jurisdiction means that a specified sheriff or a designated sheriff court can hear certain civil cases from anywhere in Scotland, rather than being limited to a local sheriffdom. The concept is grounded in the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 and secondary legislation: the Scottish Ministers may, by order, confer nationwide territorial jurisdiction for defined categories of civil proceedings. The leading example is the Sheriff Personal Injury Court in Edinburgh, a sheriff court of all-Scotland jurisdiction for personal injury actions meeting statutory thresholds or remitted from a local sheriff court or the Court of Session. Key features include a single national venue, specialist procedure and judicial expertise, and clear routes for transfer and appeal (to the Sheriff Appeal Court or Court of Session, as applicable). For practitioners, it affects forum choice, service, timetabling and litigation strategy in Scotland. The term is specific to Scotland. There is no direct equivalent label in England and Wales, Northern Ireland or Ireland, although each has specialist courts or lists with nationwide competence.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about All-Scotland jurisdiction

CHECKLISTS
Breach of warranty claims under SPAs (and APAs): claimant pre-action checklist and key procedural steps and deadlines (England and Wales)

This Checklist sets out the key points to consider when advising a prospective claimant on a potential breach of warranty claim arising from a share purchase agreement (SPA). The same broad approach will apply to an asset purchase agreement (APA). For additional guidance on breach of warranty claims, see the related content links on the right-hand side. Read this Checklist together with Practice Note: Starting an SPA breach of warranty claim—a practical guide... Action Comments Review the SPA Check the: governing/choice of law provisions — is the agreement governed by English law? jurisdiction provisions — do the English courts have jurisdiction? warranty provisions and warranty limitation provisions — does the issue fall within the warranties and are you within the time limit to bring a breach of warranty claim? Note all deadlines in the agreement that could be relevant to any potential warranty claim... Review the disclosure letter Confirm that the issue has not been disclosed against...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
B2B product safety and liability contracting: UK drafting checklist—standards, warranties/indemnities, insurance, audits, data retention, recalls, governing law/jurisdiction, and post‑Brexit EU issues

This checklist This checklist highlights the principal issues to address when preparing contractual terms for business to business agreements on product safety and liability. See Practice Note: Product liability risk management for producers for guidance on controlling risk ahead of new supply arrangements, including carrying out appropriate due diligence on other relevant businesses in the supply chain. Identify all applicable laws (eg Sale of Goods Act 1979, Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994, Consumer Protection Act 1987, General Product Safety Regulations 2005, SI 2005/1803, Consumer Rights Act 2015 and Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024), as well as any standards and codes of practice that govern the products. Take into account specific legislation for the manufacture, import and sale of particular goods such as fireworks, cosmetics, toys, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, personal protective equipment (PPE), gas appliances, food and animal feed, and automotive. See Practice Notes: Consumer protection for defective or dangerous products—legal bases, Product liability and defective products and General Product Safety Regulations...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Practitioners’ guide to Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 applications (England and Wales): jurisdiction, MIAMs, forms, standard and fast-track, FDR, orders, duration and variation

Procedure—Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 Unless an application seeks only periodical payments (ie no capital orders at all), an application under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) will proceed in accordance with the standard procedure. In the same way, where a party applies to vary an existing order, the fast-track route is available only where the variation concerns a periodical payments order and no form of capitalisation is requested. See Practice Note: Fast-track (shortened) financial remedy procedure. An application under ChA 1989, Sch 1 is issued in the Family Court and is allocated to a district judge. See Practice Notes: Procedure—Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 and Issuing financial proceedings in Form A (standard procedure). This Procedural Guide is primarily focused on applications proceeding under the standard procedure. The pre-action protocol and the overriding objective contained in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) apply to applications under ChA 1989, Sch 1—see Practice Note: Financial proceedings—pre-application requirements—Pre-application protocol (FPR 2010, PD...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about All-Scotland jurisdiction

FLOWCHARTS
International jurisdiction in UK employment disputes from 1 January 2021: flowchart on CJJA 1982, common law, and key tests (domicile, habitual place of work, place of engagement)

Within Scotland, minor offences proceed by way of a summary complaint. Summary procedure is governed under Part IX of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Scottish Civil Courts Flowchart: Standard Civil Action Structure, Jurisdiction and Appeal Routes (excluding personal injury and commercial)

In Scotland, minor offences are pursued via a summary complaint. The summary process is governed by Part IX of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Appeals from the Sheriff Appeal Court to the High Court of Justiciary in Scottish summary criminal procedure—flowchart (Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, Part 10ZA)

This flowchart outlines the actions needed to achieve valid service of the claim form outside the jurisdiction in practice. It should be read in conjunction with Practice Note: Cross-border service—a guide for dispute resolution practitioners, which details each relevant stage and also provides links to guidance for each stage...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about All-Scotland jurisdiction

NEWS
Dyson secures UPC injunction over Airwrap patent against Dreame; Spain included via importer link, UK excluded despite Northern Ireland Windsor Framework; court broadens claim scope and finds imminent infringement

On 7 April 2026, Dyson secured an interim injunction against Chinese rival Dreame after the UPC tribunal held that the ‘Dazzle’ hair styler infringed Dyson’s patent, compelling a suspension of sales throughout all UPC Member States and Spain. The Hamburg Local Division explained that including Spain (despite it not being a UPC Member State) was warranted because Dreame’s EU-based importer was actively putting the goods on the Spanish market, thereby creating a sufficiently close jurisdictional connection to hear the claims together under EU jurisdictional rules. The panel, chaired by Sabine Klepsch, declined to stretch the order to the UK. Citing the UK–EU Windsor Framework, under which certain EU product safety requirements still apply in Northern Ireland and oblige non‑EU manufacturers to appoint an EU-based representative to place goods there, Dyson argued this regulatory nexus tied UK sales to the EU and could ground UPC jurisdiction. The judges disagreed, concluding those provisions are principally intended to smooth trade between Northern Ireland and the EU, not to create an adequate legal link...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UPC long-arm jurisdiction tested: Düsseldorf Local Division asserts power over UK patent acts in Fujifilm v Kodak, raising strategic implications for enforcing European patents in non-UPC EPC states

Fujifilm Corporation v Kodak Holding GmbH and others, UPC_CFI_355/2023 Case background Fujifilm Corporation has brought proceedings against a number of Kodak entities, alleging breaches of multiple European patents covering offset printing technology. Two suits were commenced in the UPC’s Mannheim Local Division, and a further action (ACT_578607/2023; UPC_CFI_355/2023) was lodged with the Düsseldorf Local Division concerning the purported infringement of EP3594009. In that latter matter, Kodak responded with a counterclaim seeking revocation. At the time, the European patent was effective in Germany and the UK, and all litigants were domiciled in Germany, a UPC contracting member state. Decision of the Düsseldorf Local Division Ruling on the dispute, the Düsseldorf Local Division held the European patent invalid under the European Patent Convention (EPC), after refusing Fujifilm’s proposed amendments. It acknowledged it lacked competence to set aside the UK part of the patent—so that portion remains in force—whereas the German part of the patent was revoked...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK competition law update: CMA report on RedBird IMI–Telegraph Media Group, OFGEM Chapter II CA98 probe, RRIWTBER call for inputs (11 March 2024)

Mergers The CMA confirms it has, as required, sent its report to the Secretary of State on jurisdiction and competition issues linked to RedBird IMI’s anticipated acquisition of Telegraph Media Group—see further, case page. NOTE—For a summary of mergers in which the UK government has intervened on public interest grounds under the Enterprise Act 2022, see Government interventions on public interest grounds—merger cases tracker. Antitrust OFGEM has launched a Chapter II Competition Act 1998 investigation into suspected breaches of competition law, concerning a possible abuse of a dominant position—see further, press release. NOTE—For all live behavioural probes before the CMA and sectoral regulators, see UK behavioural investigations—ongoing cases tracker. Competition policy The CMA seeks inputs for its review of the Rail, Road, Inland Waterway Transport Block Exemption (RRIWTBER), assessing fitness for purpose, UK economic specifics, and impacts on UK businesses and consumers. Responses by 10 April 2024; consultation on proposed recommendations in June...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about All-Scotland jurisdiction

PRACTICE NOTES
Agricultural holdings disputes in Scotland: Scottish Land Court jurisdiction, exceptions, procedures and remedies; arbitration, mediation and appeals

For many years, virtually every disagreement about agricultural tenancies was sent to arbitration at the outset. The rationale was that questions concerning agricultural holdings often have a strong practical dimension, so arbitration was thought a more suitable forum than the courts. This reflected the earlier assumption that practical considerations predominated in such cases, making a court reference less apt back then. Over time, however, matters of considerable legal intricacy also came before arbitrators. With the enactment of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 (AH(S)A 2003), policy shifted, and the main route for resolving disputes about agricultural tenant issues is now referral to the Scottish Land Court. At the same time, arbitration procedures were streamlined, and alternative processes, eg mediation, were enabled. Although the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 (AH(S)A 1991) still sets out distinct mechanisms for dispute resolution, AH(S)A 2003 has substantially reshaped them, so that the arrangements for resolving disputes under 1991 Act Tenancies are, in large part, aligned with those for 2003 Act Tenancies...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Parental responsibility under the Children Act 1989: definition, scope, case law and key issues (education, religion, medical consent, surnames, contact, relocation, passports, adoption, guardianship) in England and Wales

This Practice Note outlines the concept of parental responsibility for children under section 3 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989). It describes what sits within the scope of parental responsibility and how the courts have read this concept in connection with matters such as education, religious upbringing, consent to medical treatment, changing a child’s surname, and removing a child from the jurisdiction. Definition Parental responsibility relates to the care and raising of a child until they reach adulthood. Under the ChA 1989, parental responsibility comprises all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities and authority that, in law, a parent holds in respect of their child and the child’s property. It also embraces the rights, powers and duties that a guardian of the child’s estate (appointed before the ChA 1989 commenced) possessed in relation to the child’s property. Those rights extend to receiving or recovering, in the guardian’s own name for the child’s benefit, property of any description and wherever located to which the child is entitled to receive...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Cayman Islands wills for non-Cayman domiciled clients: formal validity (including the 2018 Law), asset situs versus domicile, construction and revocation

This Practice Note has been prepared in collaboration with Anthony Partridge of Ogier, Cayman Islands, and Wisdom Hon of Ogier, Hong Kong. Introduction For individuals who are not domiciled in the Cayman Islands but personally hold assets located in the Cayman Islands, they may put in place a separate Will governed by Cayman Islands law to dispose of those assets and ease the subsequent probate process. Under Cayman Islands law, the governing law for both the formal validity and the essential/material validity of a Will made by a person domiciled abroad depends on the nature of the assets concerned. For immovable property situated in the Cayman Islands, the applicable law is the lex situs, namely the law of the Cayman Islands. For movable property, including cash held in bank accounts or shares in Cayman Islands companies (such as Cayman Islands exempted companies), the applicable law is the law of the deceased’s last domicile. It should be noted that not all shares connected with the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about All-Scotland jurisdiction

PRECEDENTS
Settlement agreement precedent (Scotland) for civil court or arbitration disputes, including release, agreement not to sue, confidentiality and joint minute

This Agreement is dated [ date ] Parties [ insert name of the pursuer ], a company registered in Scotland (no [ insert company number ]), whose [ registered office OR principal place of business ] is at [ insert address ] (the Pursuer) [ and ] [ ; ] [ insert name of defender ], a company registered in Scotland (no [ insert company number ]), whose [ registered office OR principal place of business ] is at [ insert address ] (the Defender). Each being a Party and, together, the Parties. Whereas (A) [ Insert details of the background to the dispute eg ‘The Parties entered into a contract for the supply of certain goods etc ]. (B) A dispute has emerged between the Parties regarding [ insert details of the dispute ] (the Dispute). (C) [ Proceedings were raised by the Pursuer against the Defender on [ date ] by way of [ Summons OR...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Comprehensive Amendments to SBCC 2016 Standard Building Contract (Without Quantities) for Scotland: Design Liability, Third-Party Agreements, Insurance, Bonds, Collateral Warranties, Payment, Retention, Fluctuations, Dispute Resolution and Insolvency

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract Without Quantities for use in Scotland 2016 published by the SBCC subject to the following amendments: Recitals and Articles updated: contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; CDP responsibility accepted; Principal Contractor duties priced; arbitration deleted; Schedule of Amendments prevails; Third Party Agreements duties. Contract Particulars: arbitration entries removed; Rectification Period set at 12 months; fluctuations and certain PII/guarantee entries deleted. Conditions: key definitions revised (Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design sub‑contractors, Funder, Site); Scottish jurisdiction; approvals mean principles only; entire agreement; variations in writing. Design/materials/programming: contractor accepts ER/CP; quality and non‑deleterious materials; programme reporting; site risk; drawings/info supply; tighter discrepancy notices. Time/defects: mitigate and advise on delay; narrower Relevant Events; Practical Completion clarified; stronger rectification, consequential damage and indemnity; phased as‑built/occupation information. IP/confidentiality/BIM: broader licence, moral rights waivers and delivery; confidentiality reinforced; BIM where adopted. Management/sub‑contracting: access, approved Site Manager, meetings; prescribed sub‑contracts; collateral warranties/third‑party rights; CDM duties; insurance...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Precedent: Scots law long-form boilerplate for commercial agreements (definitions, dispute resolution, notices, force majeure, third-party rights, counterparts, governing law and jurisdiction)

1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 Within this Agreement: Affiliate – refers to any entity that, whether directly or indirectly, Controls, is Controlled by, or is under shared Control with, another entity; Business Day – means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or a bank or public holiday in Scotland; Control – signifies [ the beneficial ownership of more than 50% of a company’s issued share capital, or the lawful power to direct, or to cause the direction of, the company’s management OR has the meaning assigned in the Corporation Tax Act 2010, s 1124 ], and Controls and Controlled shall be construed accordingly; Dispute Notice – has the meaning set out in clause 2.2; Force Majeure – has the meaning set out in clause 6.1...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about All-Scotland jurisdiction

Q&As
Section 117 MHA 1983 aftercare: governing rules E&W to Scotland

Ordinary residence Section 39(4) of the Care Act 2014 (CA 2014) states that a person provided with accommodation under section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MeHA 1983) is, for the purposes of the Act, to be treated as ordinarily resident in England or Wales, and the local authority accordingly has a duty to arrange the services required by MeHA 1983, s 117. That responsibility continues until the integrated care board or Local Health Board and the local social services authority are satisfied that the individual no longer needs aftercare... Although CA 2014 does not set out a definition of ordinary residence, the phrase bears its everyday meaning. In this context, ordinarily resident refers to a person’s home in a specific place or country which they have chosen voluntarily, and it involves matters of both fact and degree...

Read More Right Arrow