Alternative service meaning

Checklist: reporting restriction orders in family proceedings This checklist sets out the steps to consider when applying for a reporting restriction order in family proceedings, including preliminary matters such as jurisdiction, any alternative statutory provision and grounds for exclusion. It explains notifying the media through the Press Association Injunction Applications Alert Service, and notifying other parties. It also covers the duration and scope of reporting restriction orders under the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, the Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Deputy Director of Legal Services: Cafcass: Applications for reporting restriction orders) (also known as the Cafcass Practice Note), and the reporting restriction order standard order. A reporting restriction order is a court order restricting the publication or dissemination of certain information by media representatives or duly authorised lawyers about court proceedings. Its primary purpose is to protect the identities of those involved in the proceedings, such as children or incapacitated adults, where publication could cause harm, distress or a breach of privacy. ...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: A consultation, which ended on 7 July 2025, invited feedback on ways to streamline, update and reshape HMRC’s approach to dispute resolution, with the goal of boosting awareness of the existing procedures and widening access to (and participation in) alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and statutory review routes. It further suggests adopting a clearer, harmonised appeals framework that draws together the strengths of the different models currently operating for both direct and indirect tax disputes. For additional detail, see the News Analysis pieces: Tax update spring 2025—Tax analysis—Taxes management and dispute resolution and Tax update spring 2025—Improving HMRC’s approach to dispute resolution. This Checklist was prepared and authored by Anne Redston, Barrister. It represents her personal opinion; she is not authorised to speak for the Tribunals Service or the judiciary. Receipt of an HMRC decision usually triggers the timetable for an appeal to the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). This Checklist may help you avoid overlooking vital points at that crucial juncture, when swift, informed action is required...

This checklist outlines practical matters to bear in mind when managing an application for alternative service where service must occur outside England and Wales. Checklist Consideration References If you seek alternative service because permitted routes, including the Hague Convention, are likely to be lengthy and drawn out, the application ought to be buttressed by the following: a formal confirmation from the Foreign Process Office describing and confirming the likely time delays for effecting service in the relevant country; detailed evidence, preferably from a locally-qualified lawyer, showing how long service ordinarily takes via standard channels, with reference to specific experience or examples where relevant; if significant delay in that jurisdiction is notorious, exhibit independent corroborative evidence to support that position. Practice Note: Alternative service—making an application—Evidence in support The courts will consider any material indicating that a defendant is attempting to evade or impede service. A claimant should carefully record and preserve such behaviour, as doing so will strengthen the...

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Costs and funding Litigation Case management Evidence and disclosure ADR Scottish Dispute Resolution New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Dispute Resolution Highlights 2025/2026 Key DR developments Alternative dispute resolution European Parliament adopts new rules to modernise out-of-court dispute resolution for consumers The European Parliament has approved refreshed measures to enhance consumer out-of-court complaint handling, updating the EU’s ADR framework for the digital landscape and cross-border disputes. The reforms delineate ADR’s reach to cover matters arising both before and after contractual agreements, and in specified circumstances enable involvement by traders from third countries. The directive will come into force 20 days following publication and will begin to apply 32 months thereafter. For more, see: Parliament adopts new rules to modernise out-of-court dispute resolution for consumers—LNB News 16/12/2025 Court information HMCTS update hearing...

Birmingham City Council v Persons Unknown (Re Protests in Support of the Bin Workers’ Strike) [2026] EWHC 373 (KB) What are the practical implications of this case? The ruling confirms that public bodies may secure protest injunctions against ‘persons unknown’ when there is cogent proof of mounting, intentional disruption, provided procedural protections are scrupulously followed. By declining to waive service, the court emphasised that CPR 6.16 demands truly exceptional circumstances. Accordingly, claimants should implement robust alternative notification measures and adhere closely to CPR 6.15, with explicit provisions on deemed service and liberty to apply. Injunction terms should be bounded by time and geography, and supported by precise evidence addressing trespass, private nuisance and public nuisance. On substance, the decision clearly distinguishes peaceful assembly from intentional blockage of access or critical services. Although Articles 10 and 11 are in play, persistent, targeted interference with public services is unlikely to sit at the heart of the protected rights...

In this issue: Business structures Taxes management and litigation Employment taxes Companies and corporation tax VAT Environment Individuals and income tax Dates for your diary Trackers Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Latest Q&A Useful information Business structures Court of Appeal upholds UT and FTT decisions that incentivisation awards to partners are subject to income tax (HMRC v BlueCrest Capital Management LP and others and Andrew Dodd and others v HMRC) As noted below, in HMRC v BlueCrest Capital Management LP; and Andrew Dodd v HMRC [2023] EWCA Civ 1481, the Court of Appeal examined the tax position of awards granted to partners under an incentivisation scheme. It affirmed the rulings of the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) and the Upper Tribunal (UT) that, although the awards were not profit share allocations, they still represented income and were chargeable to income tax as miscellaneous income under section 687...

Prior to the coming into force of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Part II (LTA 1987), the court retained a wide-ranging jurisdiction to appoint a receiver to assume control of the management of any property (including a block of flats) whenever it was considered just and convenient to do so. Nonetheless, that power was seldom exercised in practice in relation to blocks of flats, likely owing to the expense and the frequent requirement, in most cases, and, where applicable, to evidence default by the landlord or managing agents regarding the performance of the landlord’s repairing, maintenance or insurance obligations under the lease. Part II of the LTA 1987 offers an alternative remedy by vesting power in (what are now) the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in England and the leasehold valuation tribunal in Wales to appoint a manager to take over the management of premises comprising flats; yet that jurisdiction likewise arises only where there is some default by the landlord or the managing agents in performing the landlord’s repair,...

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. The nature of reform and recurrent trends Reform is simply a means to an end—altering Civil Service structures and processes so it works more effectively. The case for reform has remained as steady as the frequency of initiatives. Over the last 40 years, major reforms have addressed one or more of six themes: efficiency and performance size, structures, functions delivery and customers markets and new business models policy-making staffing, skills and capability Across those decades, some clear tendencies have emerged: reduced confidence in sweeping structural change, such as enlarging departments or shifting functions a much stronger emphasis on customers and citizens greater use of markets and privatisation—the UK is an international outlier in its reliance on the private sector and alternative business models fresh thinking about whole systems and business models Progress within these themes has not...

The SRA Standards and Regulations allow law firms and legal service providers to organise their businesses in several formats, depending on whether they deliver reserved legal activities. Options comprise: a single SRA-regulated entity delivering both reserved and non‑reserved services an SRA‑regulated entity delivering reserved legal services, with some or all non‑reserved work carried out by a separate, non‑SRA regulated business (which, importantly, may employ SRA‑regulated solicitors) a non‑SRA regulated entity supplying only non‑reserved legal services, employing SRA‑regulated solicitors a freelance solicitor—see Practice Note: Dealing with freelance solicitors This Practice Note offers guidance to law firms on running a separate business, including allocating parts of a client matter between the law firm and the separate business, which will entail unbundling legal services. It reflects the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) and the SRA Standards and Regulations, together with separate business guidance issued by the SRA. Unless stated otherwise, references in the Practice Note to: ‘solicitor’ includes Registered European...

Claim No. [ enter claim number ]...

INSOLVENCY ACT APPLICATION NOTICE Note: Use with an application notice compliant with IR 2016 (Form IAA), r 1.35. In the High Court (Business and Property Courts, Insolvency and Companies List (ChD)) or the County Court at [ insert location ]. In the matter of [ insert company’s name ]/[ insert bankrupt’s name ]. Under IR 2016 r 12.9 and Sch 4 para 1(5). Applicant(s): [ insert names/addresses ]. Respondent(s): [ insert names/addresses ]. Concerns: [ insert details ]. Before [ identify level of judge ] at [ identify court/hearing centre ]. Court ref: [ insert number ]. Alternative service, e.g. on solicitors, by post to last known address, local press, SMS/WhatsApp/voice, message to last known Facebook/X/LinkedIn directing collection from a stated address, or any other suitable method. Costs to be paid by the Respondent(s). Further order as the court sees fit. Grounds: witness statement of [ insert name ] dated [ insert date ]. Served on: [ insert or state...

Introduction Prepare the claim form and particulars using Form LT503A. Landlords seeking an order for a fresh tenancy to be granted to the tenant must do so on Form LT503A. These drafting notes are intended solely to accompany Form LT503A. Relevant Precedents For other relevant Precedents, see: Directions—unopposed LTA 1954 business lease renewal Acknowledgement of service by tenant in unopposed claim by landlord for new tenancy Acknowledgement of service by landlord in unopposed claim by tenant for new tenancy General points Use these notes to help you complete Form LT503A, the claim form used when a landlord of commercial premises asks the court to grant the tenant a renewal lease. The Part 8 route applies; refer to the Practice Note on CPR Part 8 claims (the alternative procedure). Evidence is not required on issue unless directed by the court. You may start the claim at any County Court hearing centre; however, if the selected court does not cover...

Personal service of a divorce petition It is inferred that this Q&A concerns personal service of a divorce petition, given the mention of the ‘petitioner’. As a starting point, a divorce petition is commonly served on the respondent by first class post. That said, Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, 6.4 permits service of a divorce petition by other means, namely: personal service pursuant to FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 6.7 alternative service providing delivery on the next business day under FPR 2010, PD 6A where FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 6.11 applies (the respondent has a solicitor acting and the applicant has written notice that the solicitor is instructed to accept service of the application), service via document exchange (DX) See Practice Note: Service of applications for matrimonial and civil partnership orders within the jurisdiction...