Appointing authority meaning

When appointing and removing pension trustees: Make sure the authority to appoint or dismiss trustees is always exercised solely for a legitimate and proper purpose. Carefully review the trust deed and rules, confirming that every appointment, removal or retirement of a trustee is carried out strictly in line with those documents. Where a company serves as sole trustee, refer to the company’s articles and ensure directors are appointed, removed or retire strictly in accordance with those provisions. Identify whether any restrictions apply to the appointment or removal of trustees—for example, a minimum or maximum number—and make certain the proposed action does not contravene any such restrictions...

Administrator appointed by the court Where the court appoints an administrator under paragraph 11 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), following an application by the company, its directors and/or one or more creditors, the title deeds should include certified copies of: the administration order; and any further order(s) under IA 1986, Sch B1, paras 91–95 appointing a new administrator after the death, resignation or removal from office of the original or any later administrator Administrator appointed by holder(s) of qualifying charge, the company or its directors Where the administrator is appointed by the holder(s) of a qualifying floating charge (IA 1986, Sch B1, para 14) or by the company or its directors (IA 1986, Sch B1, para 22), the title deeds should include certified copies of: the notice of appointment: in a form complying with IA 1986, Sch B1, para 14 and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules...

This Checklist offers a concise examination of the hands-on elements involved in the tribunal secretary’s role. Its scope is to steer legal practitioners on considerations when choosing and collaborating with a tribunal secretary. The Checklist expresses no opinion on whether appointing a tribunal secretary is suitable; that determination lies with the parties and the arbitral tribunal case by case—see Practice Note: Tribunal secretaries in international arbitration—the advantages and disadvantages. It draws on the legal framework (primarily arbitration rules), case law/jurisprudence, soft law (guidelines and practice notes), professional experience, and prevailing market practices. Taxonomy Tribunal secretary is an umbrella term for a person who supports an arbitral tribunal (a sole arbitrator or a panel) during arbitration proceedings, assisting the tribunal throughout the conduct of proceedings as the arbitration process advances further...

Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights—29 August 2024 In this issue: Corporate insolvency processes Restructuring Personal insolvency Directors and insolvency Daily and weekly news alerts Corporate Rescue and Insolvency (August 2024 edition) New Q&A Corporate insolvency processes Company’s register of members | Conclusive or not for voting rights? (Bland v Keegan) In proceedings relating to JDK Construction Ltd (JDK), the Court of Appeal examined a challenge to the lawfulness of a written resolution appointing joint liquidators, alongside allegations of an unauthorised share transfer form. The Appellant argued her shares in JDK were wrongfully transferred, rendering the liquidators’ appointment invalid. The key question was whether the company’s register of members—recording her shares as transferred—was determinative for validating the members’ resolution. Affirming the decision of His Honour Judge Hodge KC, the Court of Appeal held that the register stands as prima facie evidence of who the members are and of the validity of resolutions passed by them, unless...

ND v LD [2019] EWHC 3639 (Fam) What are the practical implications of this case? It is apparent that the court may adjudicate disputes over funeral and burial arrangements, although such matters are infrequent in practice. For deceased adults, the issue typically emerges only on intestacy, as provisions are ordinarily included in a Will to settle any disagreement and to guide arrangements. Children, however, always die intestate because only adults can make a valid Will, so the limited authorities on this topic have mainly concerned deceased children. There is, nevertheless, conflicting High Court authority on the legal route by which these disputes should be determined. In Re JS (Disposal of Body) [2016] EWHC 2859 (Fam), Peter Jackson J decided that either SCA 1981, s 116 or the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction could generally be deployed, though that case was fact-specific because orders had to be made ahead of the child’s imminent death from terminal illness. ND v LD is a more ‘typical’ contest, arising after an unforeseen death. HHJ...

McGann v Eldonian Community Trust Ltd [2025] EWHC 3103 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This ruling distils several concrete lessons for those dealing with charity governance, disputed liabilities, and the deployment of winding-up petitions. To begin with, the court stressed that a creditor’s locus is tightly policed: a petitioner must evidence a debt that is either unchallenged or incapable of sensible dispute. If governance defects, dubious paperwork, or uncertainties about authority surround the claim, the court will readily conclude there is a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds. That stance makes clear winding-up petition is not a lever for pressure where the liability is itself arguable. Next, the judgment spotlights the perils of informal or flawed governance in companies limited by guarantee. Omitting AGMs, failing to keep accurate membership lists, or not appointing trustees lawfully can seriously muddy issues of authority—for example, whether directors properly instructed advisers or authorised repayment. Further, the court’s response to the altered invoice shows that documentary irregularities—even if not determinative—gravely...

This Practice Note examines the powers of the arbitral tribunal under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration Rules (the UNCITRAL Rules). For an introduction to the UNCITRAL Rules, see Practice Note: UNCITRAL Rules—background and introduction. For guidance on appointing the tribunal, see Practice Note: UNCITRAL Rules—appointment of the arbitral tribunal. A core feature of the UNCITRAL arbitration framework is the authority vested in the tribunal. The UNCITRAL Rules grant the arbitral tribunal extensive powers over the management and timetable of the proceedings, evidence, the making of awards, interim measures and the allocation of costs. General power of the arbitral tribunal The tribunal may conduct the proceedings in such manner as it deems appropriate, provided it treats the parties equally and affords each party a reasonable opportunity to present its case (UNCITRAL Rules, Article 17(1)). The broad discretion conferred on the tribunal is a fundamental tenet of UNCITRAL arbitration and is derived from the original 1976 UNCITRAL Rules...

This Practice Note provides an introduction to the overall structure of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration Rules (the UNCITRAL Rules). The UNCITRAL Rules occupy a significant role in contemporary arbitration practice. They are crafted for ad hoc international commercial arbitrations—proceedings not administered by an arbitral institution and, typically, not conducted under that institution’s rules. The Rules may likewise be employed in investor–state arbitrations commenced under a treaty, such as a bilateral investment treaty, where the treaty permits arbitration conducted under those rules. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the UNCITRAL Rules govern arbitration agreements concluded on or after 15 August 2010, ie the date the revised Rules took effect. The earlier 1976 UNCITRAL Rules continue to apply to all arbitration agreements entered into before that date. Both the 1976 and 2010 UNCITRAL Rules are separate from UNCITRAL’s Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, adopted in 1985 and revised in 2006, which has been adopted (often with modifications) by more than 50 jurisdictions—see Practice Note: The UNCITRAL...

UNCITRAL rules on costs Tribunal's fees and expenses This Practice Note addresses matters concerning costs in arbitrations under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration Rules (the UNCITRAL Rules). For an overview of the UNCITRAL framework, including the role of appointing authorities in such proceedings, see Practice Note: UNCITRAL Rules—background and introduction. Where an appointing authority (often an arbitral institution) constitutes an UNCITRAL tribunal, the parties may also agree that the institution’s schedule for arbitrators’ fees applies. In that event, the tribunal will consider that schedule when fixing its remuneration (UNCITRAL Rules, Article 41, para 2). Promptly after it is formed, the tribunal must tell the parties how it intends to set its fees and expenses, including any rates it proposes to use. A party may, within 15 days of receipt, submit this proposal to the appointing authority for review. The authority then has 45 days to evaluate whether the arbitrators’ proposals are reasonable, having regard to: the amount in dispute, ...

Part 1, interpretation and limitation of liability Unless the context requires otherwise, these articles use terms defined in the Companies Act 2006 (and any amending or subordinate legislation) and within these articles. Defined terms include: address; articles; bankruptcy (including similar overseas procedures); chair and chair of the meeting (articles 13 and 30); Companies Acts; director (including anyone acting as such); document (including electronic); electronic form/means and hard copy form; instrument; member; ordinary and special resolutions; eligible director; participate; proxy notice; relevant officer (non‑auditor officers of the company or any group undertaking, present or former); subsidiary; and writing (any visible representation, including electronic) The model articles are excluded. Unless otherwise stated, statutory expressions bear the meaning they had when these articles became binding. References to legislation include any modification, re‑enactment or replacement. Singular includes plural and vice versa; masculine includes feminine and neuter; persons include corporations Each member’s liability is limited to £1, payable on a winding up while a member or within one year of ceasing, towards:...

Company number : [ insert company name ] [ insert company name ] PLC (the Company) Form of proxy for a general meeting Before completing this form please read the explanatory notes [ I OR We ] [ insert name of shareholder [ s ] ], being [ a ] member [ s ] of the Company, hereby appoint [ insert name of proxy ]. [ insert information about shares ] Proxy’s name Shares to which this proxy appointment applies Leave blank if you are appointing one proxy or, if no person is stated in the proxy box, the chair of the meeting will act as [ my OR our ] proxy, empowered to exercise all or any of [ my OR our ] rights to attend and speak for [ me OR us ], and to act on [ my OR our ] behalf at the Company’s general meeting to be held at [ insert time ] on [ insert date ] (and at any adjournment of the...

Part 1, interpretation and limitation of liability 1 Defined terms and interpretation In these articles, unless the context dictates otherwise, expressions carry the meanings given by the Companies Act 2006 (including sections 1148, 1168, 282, 283, 1159), or as specified herein. References include, without limitation, address, articles, bankruptcy (including comparable overseas processes), chair and chair of the meeting, clear days, Companies Acts, director (including anyone acting as such), distribution recipient, document, electronic form/means, eligible director, fully paid, group, hard copy form, holder, instrument, model articles, ordinary resolution, paid, parent company, participate, proxy notice, relevant officer, shares, special resolution, subsidiary, transmittee and writing. The model articles are disapplied. Unless the context requires otherwise: legislative references include subordinate legislation and any amendment, extension, consolidation, re‑enactment or replacement; “include/including” means without limitation; singular imports plural and vice versa; masculine includes feminine and neuter; and references to persons include bodies corporate... 2 Liability of members Members’ liability is limited to any unpaid amount on the shares they hold...

Neither the legislation—Part 4, Schedule 6 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 (EIA 2006)—nor the guidance—Governance handbook and Schools causing concern—Statutory guidance for local authorities—addresses whether a duty to consult persists where a local authority intends to exercise its EIA 2006, s 65 powers to appoint an Interim Executive Board (IEB) after the entire governing body has stepped down. Warning notice As stated at page 14 of the guidance, a warning notice under Part 4 of the EIA 2006 must be provided in writing to the school’s governing body and must include: the matters on which the local authority’s concerns are based...

Assumptions have been made that this is an above-threshold procurement, conducted via a fully compliant public purchasing process in line with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), SI 2015/102, and that standstill notices were issued under PCR 2015, SI 2015/102, reg 86, to the winning tenderer and all unsuccessful tenderers, across the procurement process. We further assume the original contractor stopped trading (without entering insolvency) at any stage. Consequently, we have not examined the safe harbours that allow for modifying or substituting a contractor under PCR 2015, SI 2015/102, reg 72(1)(d) for this analysis. Where a public contract has collapsed because the supplier has stopped trading (with no sign of insolvency), and the contracting authority is contemplating appointing a replacement, several points require attention by decision-makers herein. A few illustrations are outlined below...