Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Appropriates

Appropriates meaning

What does Appropriates mean?
In criminal practice, a person appropriates property when they assume one or more rights of the owner—such as taking, using, selling, keeping or destroying it. In England and Wales and in Northern Ireland, this is defined by statute: theft Act 1968, s 3, and Theft Act (Northern Ireland) 1969, s 3, provide that any assumption of the rights of an owner amounts to appropriation. Appropriation can occur even with the owner’s consent (R v Gomez; R v Hinks), and may happen later if someone who first obtained property innocently then decides to treat it as their own (s 3(1)). A good‑faith purchaser for value is protected (s 3(2)). In Ireland, the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 adopts the same concept within the offence of theft: appropriation is the assumption of ownership rights; the offence additionally requires lack of the owner’s consent, dishonesty and an intention to deprive. In Scotland (common law), theft involves appropriating another’s property without consent and with intent to deprive; appropriation is realised by dealing with the property as one’s own, including taking, using or otherwise exercising control inconsistent with the owner’s rights. Identifying when appropriation occurs is central to charging decisions, jury directions and evidential...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Appropriates

PRACTICE NOTES
Key drafting and negotiation issues in consignment stock agreements: sale trigger, retention of title and risk, VMI, storage and access, pricing, warranties and returns

Scope and purpose This Practice Note is intended to aid the review and/or negotiation of a consignment stock agreement, and sits alongside the Precedents: Consignment stock agreement—pro-customer and Consignment stock agreement—pro-supplier. Under a consignment stock set-up, the seller of goods (the consignor) places a stock of goods with the buyer (the consignee) while retaining title until the point the buyer takes or appropriates items for its own use. The buyer typically keeps the seller’s stock on its own premises and may draw on it as needed. This differs subtly from a standard supply on retention of title terms: with consignment stock (absent contrary wording), no contract of sale for identified consigned goods arises until the buyer appropriates them from the stock for use, whereas in a typical supply the contract usually exists before delivery Types of consignment stock arrangement Consignment stock arrangements can arise in various settings. They are particularly useful where an uninterrupted supply of the relevant goods is so critical to the buyer that it...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Expropriation under investment treaties: direct, indirect and creeping takings, regulatory carve-outs, compensation and jurisdictional scope

A definition of expropriation In the setting of investment treaty arbitration, expropriation arises where a state appropriates the property of a foreign investor and payment of compensation is required. A central safeguard found in almost all bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and multilateral investment treaties (MITs) is the bar on expropriation (or nationalisation) unless adequate compensation is provided. Yet the drafting of many treaties offers scant, express direction on what, precisely, is meant by expropriation. Consequently, numerous investment treaty arbitration tribunals have wrestled with drawing the boundaries of what amounts to a “taking” of property and identifying the minimum elements of what qualifies as “adequate” compensation. The effort to craft a stable definition is further hindered by the reality that the clauses in BITs are alike, though not the same. These fine textual variations have, in several investment treaty awards, become the subject of close scrutiny. This Practice Note employs the UK Model BIT to examine these questions in greater depth. Practice Notes: Investment treaty arbitration—an introduction and Protections for...

Read More Right Arrow