Arbitration rules meaning

CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) This Checklist is archived and no longer being actively maintained. Numerous arbitral organisations have responded to the coronavirus pandemic by issuing practical guidance and/or making adjustments to their standard procedures and working practices. For further details on how this material and associated arbitration proceedings could be affected, see Practice Note: Arbitral organisations and coronavirus (COVID-19)—practical impact [Archived] [Archived] [Archived]. For additional information, see: Coronavirus (COVID-19) and arbitration—overview. For direct links to guidance on the 2021 ICC Rules (effective 1 January 2021) and the 2012 ICC Rules, see: ICC arbitration—overview...

ARCHIVED This Flowchart is archived and is no longer maintained. FORTHCOMING CHANGE On 11 August 2020, the LCIA released the 2020 edition of its Arbitration Rules, which take effect on 1 October 2020 (the LCIA Rules 2020). These apply to all arbitrations begun on and after that date. A new set of Practice Notes for the LCIA Rules 2020 is in preparation...

This Checklist offers a concise examination of the hands-on elements involved in the tribunal secretary’s role. Its scope is to steer legal practitioners on considerations when choosing and collaborating with a tribunal secretary. The Checklist expresses no opinion on whether appointing a tribunal secretary is suitable; that determination lies with the parties and the arbitral tribunal case by case—see Practice Note: Tribunal secretaries in international arbitration—the advantages and disadvantages. It draws on the legal framework (primarily arbitration rules), case law/jurisprudence, soft law (guidelines and practice notes), professional experience, and prevailing market practices. Taxonomy Tribunal secretary is an umbrella term for a person who supports an arbitral tribunal (a sole arbitrator or a panel) during arbitration proceedings, assisting the tribunal throughout the conduct of proceedings as the arbitration process advances further...

This flowchart takes you through the stages of a CIETAC arbitration under the CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2024 Although each arbitration differs and the tribunal will tailor proceedings to specifics of the case, it remains vital to appreciate how an arbitration will 'usually' progress, together with the timescales likely to apply...

This flowchart supports a tenant’s bid to extend a lease under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993). It explains the procedure beginning with service of the tenant’s section 42 notice, then the landlord’s section 45 counter-notice, and the time limits for issuing applications to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) (or, in Wales, the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT)), and/or to the County Court where required. Note 1 See Practice Note: Guide to lease extensions of flats under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993—Preparation for securing a lease extension...

ARCHIVED This flowchart is archived and no longer receives any maintenance...

Oswin v Otila; and Ondray Claim No ARB 032/2025 What was the background? This matter arose from a falling-out between Oswin (the Claimant) and Ondray (the Second Defendant) over how to run their joint venture company, Otila (the First Defendant). Oswin owned 49% of the First Defendant’s shares and Ondray 51%. The board could act only by unanimous vote, while shareholder resolutions required a 75% super-majority. When they were unable to agree on management and operations, the company became deadlocked. Their relationship was governed by a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) dated 12 March 2019, which included an arbitration clause calling for DIFC-seated proceedings under the DIFC-LCIA Rules. The Claimant also operated a medical and hazardous waste facility under an Operations and Management Agreement due to expire on 21 August 2025. On 15 August 2025, the Claimant issued a Dispute Notice under clause 21.2 of the JVA, alleging that the Second Defendant was assuming strategic decision-making without proper authority—covering directions on renewal of the O&M Agreement, instruction of external...

Alrubie v Chelsea Football Club Ltd and another [2025] EWHC 541 (Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision will particularly interest arbitration practitioners and professionals working in sports clubs, and could equally concern other organisations whose members are controlled by association rules. Commonly, those participating in professional sports clubs accept, by reason of their membership, that they are bound by the club’s rulebook and by the regulations of any national and worldwide governing bodies. Such regimes routinely incorporate arbitration agreements, owing in part to the confidentiality of arbitral proceedings, which protects against undesirable public attention, and in part to the ability to appoint arbitrators with specialist knowledge of the sport’s rules and industry practices. The case clarifies that these rules may have ‘horizontal’ contractual effect between members, as well as ‘vertical’ effect between each member and the governing body, notwithstanding the absence of any express bilateral agreement between members. It underlines how membership-based governance can, through the acceptance of rulebooks, generate binding obligations that...

In this issue: Building safety Building regulations Alternative dispute resolution Arbitration Environmental issues Projects Construction industry news Daily and weekly news alerts Construction trackers Building safety CLC announces restructure of ICSG The CLC has set out a reorganisation of the Industry Competence Steering Group (ICSG) to enhance competence and safety standards across the built environment sector. Under this strategic change, the ICSG will become a formal working group within the Building Safety Regulator’s Industry Competence Committee. The refreshed framework features sector-led groups, key topic groups and working groups, informed by contributions from more than 60 professional and trade bodies and 1,500 individuals, reinforcing the drive for improved standards. See: LNB News 09/12/2024 61. Housing (Cladding Remediation) (Scotland) Act 2024 (Commencement) Regulations 2024 SSI 2024/370 These regulations designate 6 January 2025 as the appointed day on which all provisions of the Housing (Cladding Remediation) (Scotland) Act 2024 not already commenced will come into...

This Practice Note examines the powers of the arbitral tribunal under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration Rules (the UNCITRAL Rules). For an introduction to the UNCITRAL Rules, see Practice Note: UNCITRAL Rules—background and introduction. For guidance on appointing the tribunal, see Practice Note: UNCITRAL Rules—appointment of the arbitral tribunal. A core feature of the UNCITRAL arbitration framework is the authority vested in the tribunal. The UNCITRAL Rules grant the arbitral tribunal extensive powers over the management and timetable of the proceedings, evidence, the making of awards, interim measures and the allocation of costs. General power of the arbitral tribunal The tribunal may conduct the proceedings in such manner as it deems appropriate, provided it treats the parties equally and affords each party a reasonable opportunity to present its case (UNCITRAL Rules, Article 17(1)). The broad discretion conferred on the tribunal is a fundamental tenet of UNCITRAL arbitration and is derived from the original 1976 UNCITRAL Rules...

This Practice Note sets out guidance on arbitral awards in proceedings under the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) Administered Arbitration Rules 2018 (2018 HKIAC Rules; HKIAC 2018). As explained in Practice Note: HKIAC (2018)—the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules—application and key features, the 2018 HKIAC Rules generally govern HKIAC arbitrations commenced on or after 1 November 2018, save where the parties agree otherwise; for HKIAC arbitrations begun before 1 November 2018, the 2013 HKIAC Rules will generally apply unless the parties agreed otherwise. For an overview of the HKIAC and how it is organised, see Practice Note: HKIAC—background to and structure of the institution. Awards in HKIAC arbitrations In line with most institutional regimes, under the 2018 HKIAC Rules a tribunal may render interim, interlocutory, or partial awards and, in addition to a final award, may issue interim awards as to costs (HKIAC 2018, art 35.1). Where the tribunal has more than one arbitrator, any award or other ruling is to be made by a majority. Failing a...

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. It is provided for background information only. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is an independent regulatory organisation supervising the US securities market. As part of its remit, FINRA runs the securities industry’s largest dispute resolution forum. It addresses financial and commercial disagreements between investors, brokerage firms and individual brokers, as well as disputes within and between brokerage firms and brokers. Matters are resolved through FINRA’s own arbitration process. FINRA maintains two Codes of Arbitration Procedure: the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes (the Customer Code or Section 12000 of the FINRA Rules), which governs arbitrations between investors and industry participants, and the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes (the Industry Code or Section 13000 of the FINRA Rules), which governs arbitrations between industry parties This note relates to costs under both Codes. Filing fees Any party bringing a claim—including a counterclaim, a cross-claim or a...

To: Singapore International Arbitration Centre28 Maxwell Road, 03–01 Maxwell Chambers SuitesBY [ SPECIFY MODE OF DELIVERY ]Singapore 069115 Attn: The Registrar With copy, including all attachments, to: [ Insert name and address of all Respondents ]BY [ SPECIFY MODE OF DELIVERY ] Dear [ Registrar of SIAC ], We enclose a Notice of Arbitration, now lodged with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) in accordance with rule 3 of the SIAC Rules of Arbitration, 6th Edition, 2016 (SIAC Rules). A copy is being served on the Respondent(s) by the service method(s) indicated above. The service date is [ insert anticipated date of delivery ]. [ Pursuant to rule 3.1(k) of the SIAC Rules, we attach a local cheque for [ insert amount ], payable to the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, covering the required filing fee. OR Pursuant to rule 3.1(k) of the SIAC Rules, the sum of [ insert amount ], being the requisite filing fees, was remitted on [ insert date ]...

Special Conditions: Amendments to the General Conditions of Contract of the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE) Form of Contract—Lump Sum Contracts, the Red Book, fifth edition (2013) Special Conditions The General Conditions in the IChemE Red Book, fifth edition (2013) shall apply as altered below: Agreement Paragraph 8: remove ‘6.3’. Paragraph 14: after ‘fax number’ include: ‘or email address’. Add ‘Email Address’ to the contact details for both the Purchaser and the Contractor. Paragraph 16: delete the paragraph and replace with ‘Not used’. 1. Definitions, interpretation, waiver and Notices Sub-clause 1.1 Within the definition of Cost, insert ‘, reasonably and necessarily’ immediately after ‘properly’. Within the definition of Legislation, add at the end: (including Acts of Parliament and subordinate instruments; orders; rules and/or regulations made thereunder; and/or the rules; regulations and/or bye-laws made by any body of competent jurisdiction in respect of which the Contractor or Purchaser (as appropriate) has a legal obligation to comply,...

Section 14 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) Under section 14 AA 1996, the parties may themselves decide the point at which an arbitration begins; failing any such agreement, the statute prescribes when the arbitration is treated as having started under the statutory framework in place. Where a party is approaching expiry of the limitation period for starting arbitration, precision over the moment of commencement is critical. In addition, certainty on this question matters because a range of other key dates, including the schedule for appointing the tribunal, flow from the date on which proceedings are taken to have commenced. For further guidance on limitation periods, see Practice Notes: Commencement date of an arbitration under the AA 1996 and arbitration rules, Limitation periods in arbitration (England & Wales) and Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984...