Powered by Lexis+®

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on Assault and battery

Assault and battery meaning

What does Assault and battery mean?
In legal practice, “assault and battery” describes two linked wrongs: assault is causing another to apprehend immediate, unlawful violence; battery is the intentional or reckless application of unlawful force, even minimal touching beyond everyday contact. In England & Wales and Northern Ireland, the offences are distinct at common law, with definitions developed by case law; ‘common assault’ covers an assault (fear-only) and ‘assault by beating’ is commonly used to describe battery. Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (E&W) sets trial and sentencing but not the definitions. Assault can be committed without physical contact (e.g. words or gestures) if immediacy is established. Both offences require intention or recklessness; defences include consent, lawful authority and reasonable self-defence. The same concepts underpin civil claims in tort for assault and battery (trespass to the person). In Scotland, there is no separate battery: assault is an intentional attack; mere threats are not assault and are prosecuted under other offences such as threatening or abusive behaviour. In Ireland, ‘assault’ is defined by the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 to include both applying force and causing another reasonably to fear immediate force; ‘battery’ is not a separate statutory offence.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Assault and battery

NEWS
Weekly Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence Highlights (England and Wales): Vicarious Liability; QOCS for PIRA Victims; Maternity Services Debate; PIDR Minutes; New Intermediate/Fast Track SDOs — 25 January 2024

In this issue: Employers' liability Costs Clinical negligence Damages Case management Daily and weekly news alerts Useful information Employers' liability Work experience tortfeasor held not sufficiently closely connected to defendant to be akin to employment Permission to appeal was declined by the Supreme Court on 19 December 2023. In an earlier ruling, the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in MXX v A Secondary School [2023] EWCA Civ 996 dismissed the claimant’s appeal. The respondent was a mixed secondary school educating pupils aged 11 to 16. The appellant, then 13, had joined the school. PXM, a former pupil of the school, undertook a work experience placement (WEP) there. He committed the torts of assault and battery against the claimant, later pleading guilty to sexual activity with a child. The claimant sought agreed damages of £27,500 for personal injury (recognised psychiatric illness) arising from the sexual assaults. The judge dismissed the claim, finding the school was...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Assault and battery

PRACTICE NOTES
Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (s 47 OAPA 1861): Elements, Defences, CPS Charging Standard, Sentencing Guidelines and Racially Aggravated Form (England and Wales)

The offence of actual bodily harm Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH) can be tried in either the magistrates' court or the Crown Court. In most instances, ABH is tried in the magistrates' court unless that court considers its sentencing powers inadequate (see: Sentencing for ABH below). Elements of the offence Under section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OATPA 1861), the prosecution must prove: an assault or a battery; and that the assault or battery caused the victim actual bodily harm. Assault The prosecution must establish: conduct, done intentionally or recklessly, which causes the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful violence. It is unnecessary for any force to be used; the required element is the fear or anticipation of violence. Battery The prosecution must establish: the infliction of unlawful force upon another person; and that such force was applied intentionally or recklessly....

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Assault with intent to resist or prevent arrest (OAPA 1861, s 38): elements, lawful apprehension, mistake of fact, defences and sentencing in England and Wales

The offence of assault with intent to resist or prevent arrest, contrary to section 38 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OATPA 1861), is triable either in the magistrates’ court or in the Crown Court. Magistrates may refuse jurisdiction where their sentencing powers are thought to be inadequate in a given case. Guidance on the scope of magistrates’ court sentencing is set out, for that purpose, in the Sentencing Council’s Magistrates’ Court overarching guideline—allocation where relevant. Elements of the offence of assault with intent to resist or prevent arrest The components of the offence appear in OATPA 1861, s 38. The prosecution must show that the accused committed the following: an assault upon any person with the intention to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detention of themselves or another for any offence Meaning of assault A charge under OATPA 1861, s 38 demands proof of a common assault. Common assault consists of conduct causing the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Core torts in England and Wales: trespass (land, goods, person), conversion, defamation and privacy, product liability, and animals, with cryptoasset considerations

This Practice Note considers the torts of: trespass to land tort of conversion and trespass to goods trespass to the person (assault, battery and false imprisonment) privacy and defamation tortious product liability tortious liability for animals For guidance on other torts, see Practice Notes: Procedural abuse torts and similar Vicarious liability and multi-party torts For guidance on negligence claims, see Practice Note: Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claim and related content. For practical guidance on negligence, nuisance and breach of statutory duty claims, see: Tort and negligence claims—overview. For guidance on bringing and defending claims against professionals, see: Professional negligence claims—overview. The tort of trespass to land This tort is committed where an individual (D) carries out an act that brings about entry onto another’s land (C) without consent or lawful justification. No physical harm to the land is required for liability. To amount to trespass in tort, D’s...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Assault and battery

PRECEDENTS
High Court Precedent Particulars of Claim (England and Wales): Unlawful Home Entry, Assault and Battery, False Imprisonment, Personal Injury, and Breach of ECHR Articles 3 and 5

[ [ INSERT LOCATION ] DISTRICT REGISTRY ] Parties [ Insert the Claimant’s name ], acting by [ his OR her ] litigation friend [ Insert the Litigation Friend’s name ] Claimant -and- [ Insert the Defendant’s name ] Defendant PARTICULARS OF CLAIM INTRODUCTION The Claimant seeks a declaration together with damages stemming from the raid on [ his OR her ] home on [ insert date ] and [ his OR her ] ensuing detention between [ insert date ] and [ insert date ]. In summary, the Claimant asserts that: On [ insert date ], in the course of the raid at the Claimant’s residence, the Claimant was subjected to multiple assaults and batteries and/or treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR, and was falsely imprisoned and/or suffered a breach of Article 5 ECHR; The Claimant’s detention from [ insert date ] to [ insert date ] amounted to false...

Read More Right Arrow