Powered by Lexis+®

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”

Avensure

Access all documents on Automatism

Automatism meaning

What does Automatism mean?
Automatism describes involuntary conduct where a person’s movements are not controlled by conscious will, so they lack capacity to choose or to stop the act. In UK and Irish criminal law it operates as a case-law defence negating the voluntary act element and mens rea. The law distinguishes: non‑insane automatism, caused by an external factor (e.g., a blow to the head, hypoglycaemia from insulin), requiring a total loss of voluntary control and leading to acquittal (Bratty v Attorney General for Northern Ireland; R v Quick; Attorney General’s Reference (No. 2 of 1992)); and insane automatism, where the cause is an internal “disease of the mind” (e.g., epilepsy, sleepwalking, hyperglycaemia), attracting the special verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity (R v Hennessy; R v Burgess). Self‑induced automatism, especially through voluntary intoxication, is generally unavailable. England & Wales and Northern Ireland follow these principles (Bratty originated in NI). Scotland recognises automatism where an external cause produces a total alienation of reasoning and control; internally caused states fall within the special defence of insanity under the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 (Ross v HM Advocate). Ireland applies similar case‑law principles alongside the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006. Defendants bear an evidential burden.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Automatism

PRACTICE NOTES
Careless or Inconsiderate Driving (Great Britain, RTA 1988): Elements, Roads and Public Places, Examples, Defences, Alternative Verdicts, Sentencing and Fixed Penalties, and Causing Serious Injury

Careless or inconsiderate driving If someone drives a car carelessly on a road or in a public place, or acts without regard for other users of that road or place, they may commit the offence of careless or inconsiderate driving under section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988). Under RTA 1988, s 3, the offence is triable summarily only. Elements of the offence of careless driving To be convicted, it must be shown that a person: drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration, for other persons using the road or public place Drive Although the RTA 1988 does not define driving, the courts have ruled that driving is a physical act that only an individual can perform. The Divisional Court has determined that the expression does not extend to a limited company (Richmond London Borough Council v Pinn and Wheeler...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Specific and Basic Intent: Definitions, Limits, Intoxication and Automatism Defences, and Indictment Drafting Guidance

Intention Intention denotes the result the defendant seeks. Offences are often categorised as ones of basic intent or specific intent. The Court of Appeal has labelled this division elusive. Even so, the Court offered guidance on specific intent: crimes of specific intent require proof of purpose or consequence, and include, though are not limited to, cases where the objective extends beyond the actus reus, sometimes called ulterior intent. The Court also endorsed the analysis that a line can be drawn between (i) intention considered in light of the actor’s purposes and (ii) intention viewed apart from those purposes. In some instances a general intent accompanying the act is all that is needed to constitute the offence; in others, in addition to that general intent, there must be a specific intent linked to the purpose for which the act is done. Put plainly, specific intent offences require an intention to secure something beyond the act itself, whereas basic intent offences require only an intention to carry out...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Causing Death by Careless or Inconsiderate Driving (RTA 1988 s 2B): Elements, Causation, Defences, Charging, Alternative Verdicts and Sentencing (England and Wales)

Causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving A motorist who drives without due care or with a lack of regard for other road users, and whose driving leads to a fatality, may commit the offence of causing death by careless driving under s 2B of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988). It is an either-way offence, capable of being heard in the Crown Court or the magistrates’ court. Elements of the offence of death by careless driving The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant: caused another person’s death by driving a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or public place CPS guidance on charging decisions arising from driving incidents has been revised. The two most notable updates from the earlier guidance relate to drivers responding to emergencies and fatalities where the deceased is a close friend or...

Read More Right Arrow