BA meaning

Anti-bribery and corruption Checklist This anti-bribery and corruption Checklist helps you assess whether your systems meet the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) and the government’s guidance on bribery and corruption. Read it together with these subtopics: Anti-bribery and corruption—regulatory regime Anti-bribery and corruption—Identifying & assessing risks Anti-bribery and corruption—policy and procedures, or for law firms, Anti-bribery and corruption—policy and procedures—law firms Anti-bribery and corruption—gifts and hospitality Anti-bribery and corruption—agents and intermediaries Anti-bribery and corruption—joint ventures and acquisitions Anti-bribery and corruption—charitable and political donations Anti-bribery and corruption—staff training & awareness, or for law firms, Anti-bribery and corruption—staff training and awareness—law firms Anti-bribery and corruption—monitoring and review This Checklist signposts relevant Precedents you can use or tailor to satisfy these requirements and recommendations. It includes a box to indicate whether each item has been completed and a section to add comments or record action points...

STOP PRESS This Practice Note is being revised to incorporate the new guidance from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) - Self report policy: guidance to businesses reporting economic crime offences - under which businesses may now self‑report a range of economic crime offences. There are significant differences between the self‑reporting initiative operated by COPFS in Scotland and the deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) regime running in the rest of the UK. Any business that discovers corruption within the organisation should ensure it understands these distinctions before deciding which authority to contact. This Checklist sets out the main differences between the Scottish self‑reporting initiative and the DPA regime applied elsewhere in the UK. Introduction to the two regimes Scottish self-reporting initiative The Scottish self‑reporting initiative was launched on 1 July 2011 when the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010), a UK‑wide statute, took effect. The Scottish initiative applies solely to offences under BA 2010 or analogous bribery offences that applied before BA 2010 commenced. Under the...

Investigations into suspected breaches of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 (FCPA 1977) are frequently lengthy and complex. Questions around privilege, voluntary self-reporting and cross-border dynamics must be thoroughly assessed and managed with care. This Checklist should be read alongside the Practice Note: Practical steps in a bribery investigation—UK and US perspectives. For further detail on the FCPA, see Practice Notes: US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 (FCPA 1977) and Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) comparison table, and FCPA internal investigations and enforcement proceedings (US). Prior to investigation Lawyers should consider the following steps: Ensure the company has a robust compliance programme, backed by sufficient resources and incorporating anonymous reporting channels and whistleblowing policies. Under the US Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organisations, when deciding whether to bring charges, negotiate plea or other agreements, and determine fines, the DOJ assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of the corporation’s compliance programme at the time of...

In this issue: Budgets and Finance Bills Companies and corporation tax Brexit and tax Real estate tax Individuals and income tax Stamp and transfer taxes VAT Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Useful information Budgets and Finance Bills King’s Speech 2024 His Majesty the King outlined the government’s priorities, agenda and intended measures for the forthcoming parliamentary session during the State Opening of Parliament on 17 July 2024. Initial reactions from the Private Client community to the announcements have been collated. See: LNB News 17/07/2024 92. CIOT letter to the new Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury The CIOT has written to the incoming Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury, James Murray MP, setting out tax matters for the new administration. See: LNB News 17/07/2024 22. Companies and corporation tax Supreme Court finds advisers’ fees were capital in...

In this issue: Air emissions and climate change Brexit Contamination and pollution Energy efficiency and buildings Energy for environmental lawyers Environmental assessment Environmental enforcement and prosecutions Environmental information ESG and sustainability Marine Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Water, flooding and drainage Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Trackers Useful information Air emissions and climate change EA issues five guides on monitoring ambient air. The Environment Agency has released five guidance documents covering approaches to ambient air monitoring. See: LNB News 10/09/2024 17. NSTA releases 2024 Emissions Monitoring Report. The North Sea Transition Authority reports a 28% fall in production emissions across the UK’s upstream oil and gas sector between 2018 and 2023, with half of the cuts delivered through targeted emissions reduction actions. Despite the drop, emissions intensity—greenhouse gases per barrel produced—is expected to have risen due to lower output. See: LNB...

In this issue: Autumn Budget 2024 Brexit highlights Brexit SIs Subsidy control and State aid Judicial review Equality and human rights Constitutional and administrative law Information law Other Public law news LexTalk®Public Law: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Useful information Autumn Budget 2024 Bar Council responds to Autumn Budget 2024 The Bar Council has issued its reaction to the Autumn Budget, praising the ‘overall settlement for justice’. The settlement sets a departmental expenditure limit of £13.8bn for 2025–2026 for the Ministry of Justice. The Bar Council’s Chair, Sam Townend, welcomed the uplift, describing it as an overdue move towards treating justice as a core public service. He nevertheless cautioned that the sector remains far from recovery, pointing to a 20% real-terms per person cut in justice funding since 2010. To move beyond crisis...

ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note offers a practical guide to running and resisting investigations and prosecutions under the UK’s former corruption framework that applied before the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) commenced (the pre‑BA 2010 regime). It addresses: how to frame charges for common law bribery (ie under the relevant statutes), including charge selection for conduct straddling both regimes case law defining a public body the need for a corrupt intent the presumption of corruption and associated human rights ramifications the requirements of secrecy and corruption, and what companies can do to minimise historic exposure to prosecution This Practice Note also considers: the offence of bribery at common law the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889 (PBCPA 1889) the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 (PCA 1906), and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916 (PCA 1916) For details on the operative legal provisions, ongoing liability, territorial reach, and penalties and sentencing...

The Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) Enacted to secure the UK’s adherence to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) delivers an effective framework to address corruption across public and private spheres, updating the UK’s anti-corruption regime and supplanting Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 and Prevention of Corruption Act 1916. BA 2010 carries significant consequences for any company incorporated in, or trading from, the UK. Its global reach covers bribery undertaken by a business, or by third parties acting for it, regardless of where in the world the conduct occurs...

Practice Note In this Practice Note, the term ‘bank’ denotes a UK institution authorised under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) to undertake the regulated activity of accepting deposits (as defined by FSMA 2000, s 22, read with Schedule 2 and any order under FSMA 2000, s 22), and any mention of ‘bank’ below also covers a resolution company. In the wake of Silicon Valley Bank’s failure, the government consulted on additional reforms and, in May 2025, passed the Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Act 2025 (see: LNB News 19/07/2024 30). These changes are not confined to smaller banks and, from 16 July 2025, apply to banks of any size, provided the other entry conditions are met (see Practice Note: Bank resolution reforms under the Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Act 2025). Part 1 of the Banking Act 2009 (BA 2009) likewise extends to building societies and investment firms, with modifications specified in BA 2009. Central counterparties, meanwhile, are now subject to their own special resolution regime...

The Schedule 1 Definitions 1.1 In this Schedule: Adequate Procedures – must be interpreted in line with BA 2010 and any guidance issued under it; Associated Person – means any or all of: (a) the officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, subsidiaries, and individuals Associated With a party (Associates); and (b) persons Associated With any of those Associates, in every instance engaged in carrying out services for, or on behalf of, that party, the Services, and/or this Agreement; and Associated With – where used: (a) in paragraph 2 and in relation to bribery, is to be construed in accordance with BA 2010 and guidance issued under it; (b) in paragraph 4 and regarding the facilitation of tax evasion, is to be construed in accordance with Part 3 of CFA 2017 and guidance issued under it; (c) in paragraph 5 and as regards fraud, is to be construed in accordance with Part 5 of ECCTA 2023 and guidance issued under it; BA 2010 – means the...

1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 Within these Conditions, the terms below shall have the following meanings: Adequate Procedures – to be interpreted in accordance with BA 2010 and the guidance issued under it; Affiliate – any entity that, directly or indirectly, Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with, another entity; Applicable Law – all applicable laws, legislation, statutory instruments, regulations, and governmental guidance having binding effect, whether local or national [ or international in any relevant jurisdiction ]; Associated Person – means any or all of: (a) a party’s officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, subsidiaries, and persons Associated With that party (the Associates); and (b) persons Associated With any of the Associates, in each case engaged in performing services for or on behalf of that party, the Services and/or the Contract; Associated With – when used: (a) in clause 10 and in respect of bribery, shall be read in accordance with BA 2010 and the guidance published under it; (b)...

1 Introduction 1.1 Bribery and corruption persist as significant problems in global commerce, notwithstanding numerous targeted initiatives to deter them. They inflict serious harm on communities where they arise. They: 1.1.1 divert funds and other assets away from those most in need; 1.1.2 impede economic and social progress; 1.1.3 harm enterprise, notably by pushing up the price of goods and services. 1.2 Our statutory duties are chiefly set by the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010). BA 2010 applies to us as a UK organisation if bribery happens anywhere within our operations. 1.3 We conduct our business [ es ] with integrity, and in a frank and principled way. Each of us must act to ensure [ insert organisation’s name ] stays free from bribery or corruption. 1.4 This policy is central to that aim. It is fully endorsed by the [ insert, eg Board ]. It explains the measures everyone must follow to stop bribery and corruption in our...

Please note, this Q&A deals exclusively with UK bribery legislation. Payment of commissions We refer you to Practice Note: How to identify when a commission might become a bribe, which explains that any commission involves providing a financial advantage, albeit it will not invariably amount to a bribe. The Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) adopts a wide view of what can constitute a bribe. It is characterised as a 'financial or other advantage' offered or received in a business setting, which amounts to, or induces, the improper performance of a relevant function or activity...

The question considered by the Supreme Court in Lipton, and the Interpretation Act (or accrued rights) analysis In Lipton v BA Cityflyer, the UK Supreme Court, speaking obiter, examined the temporal reach of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A 2018). The issue was whether the provisions on retained EU law (REUL) must be applied by courts to disputes founded on facts predating IP completion day at the end of 2020, and to rights and liabilities that had already crystallised by that point. For ease of reference in this Q&A, matters turning on facts from before IP completion day are called ‘pre-Brexit cases’, while those arising from facts after that date are termed ‘post-Brexit cases’. On one interpretation, the response is that the EU(W)A 2018 provisions concerning REUL and assimilated law have no application to pre-Brexit cases. The temporal operation of REUL and of assimilated law is straightforward: before IP completion day, the UK’s domestic law operated insofar as it implemented the UK’s EU...

Section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) provides: (1) A relevant commercial organisation (“C”) is guilty of an offence under this section if a person (“A”) associated with C offers a bribe to another person with the intention of: (a) securing or retaining business for C; or (b) securing or retaining an advantage in the conduct of C’s business. (2) However, it is a defence for C to prove that it had in place adequate procedures devised to prevent persons associated with C from carrying out such conduct. BA 2010, s 8 defines an associated person: (1) For the purposes of section 7, a person (“A”) is associated with C if (disregarding any bribe under consideration) A is a person who performs services for or on behalf of C. (2) The capacity in which A performs services for or on behalf of C does not matter. (3) Accordingly A may (for example) be C’s...