Describes the position where a bank holds a customer’s tangible property (for example deeds, certificates or jewellery) in safe custody: in doing so, the bank takes possession as bailee for value and must keep and return the identical property on demand in accordance with the custody terms.
This is a common law characterisation found in case law rather than defined by statute. Key features are: the bank is not a trustee or insurer; it owes a duty of reasonable care in storing and safeguarding the items; it must not use the property without authority; and it must redeliver to the bailor (or authorised person) and account for any loss caused by breach of duty, including potential liability in conversion for misdelivery.
A
banker’s general lien does not ordinarily extend to items deposited purely for safe custody, absent clear agreement to the contrary. Contract terms may allocate risk, require identification or proof of title, and may limit liability where permitted.
Usage and effect are broadly consistent across England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Ireland under the law of bailment. In Scotland, the relationship is analysed under custody/deposit with analogous duties of reasonable care and redelivery.