Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on Bankruptcy petition (Commercial)

Bankruptcy petition (Commercial) meaning

What does Bankruptcy petition (Commercial) mean?
A bankruptcy petition is the formal court request—most commonly by a creditor—to have an individual declared bankrupt where an undisputed debt remains unpaid, typically after service of a statutory demand. It is a statutory process: in England and Wales under the insolvency act 1986, creditors present a bankruptcy petition to the court (minimum debt currently £5,000). Debtors do not petition the court; since 2016 they apply online to the Adjudicator for a bankruptcy order. In Northern Ireland, creditor and debtor bankruptcy petitions are made to the High Court under the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989. In Scotland, the equivalent process is a petition for sequestration under the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016. In Ireland, bankruptcy petitions are presented to the High Court under the Bankruptcy Act 1988 (creditor petitions require a statutory minimum debt, currently €20,000). Key features include evidence of the debt and grounds, service, and a court hearing at which the court may make a bankruptcy order, dismiss or adjourn, or consider alternatives (for example, an IVA in England and Wales). From presentation, significant consequences may follow: in England and Wales and Northern Ireland, dispositions by the debtor can be void unless validated. Companies are not bankrupted; they are wound...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Bankruptcy petition (Commercial)

NEWS
England and Wales ICC grants winding-up; refuses to set aside statutory demands—disputed debt, conspiracy cross-claims and implied terms arguments rejected (Martin v McLaren [2025] EWHC 406 (Ch))

Martin v McLaren Construction Ltd and McLaren Construction Ltd v Martin Dawn Plc [2025] EWHC 406 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision confirms that a debtor cannot fend off winding-up or bankruptcy petitions merely by disputing the sum claimed or pointing to set-offs or counterclaims exceeding the petition debt, in order to resist such relief. The court will interrogate the parties’ material in depth, weighing what is produced on both sides, and will apply an approach comparable to that used on a summary judgment application when assessing whether there is a real defence. While recognising that conspiracies are typically concealed and often difficult to evidence directly, a litigant advancing such an allegation must still produce some evidential foundation for it, particularly where the contention is not inherently convincing or appears improbable on its face. The ruling underlines that English courts are hesitant to imply terms into negotiated bargains, especially where the agreement operates perfectly sensibly without the addition and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK restructuring and insolvency update: economic crime strategy, bankruptcy and secured-sale rulings, bank resolution/MREL changes, ISDA CDS consultation, and new fraud/asset-recovery guidance (17 July 2025)

In this issue: Key R&I law developments Personal insolvency Directors and insolvency Insolvency litigation Financial institutions Daily and weekly news alerts Key dates for restructuring and insolvency professionals New content Key R&I law developments Insolvency Service launches five-year strategy to combat economic crime The Insolvency Service has unveiled its 2026–31 investigation and enforcement plan, materially broadening its role in addressing economic crime. It sets three principal aims: enforcing the UK insolvency framework, applying the Companies Act 1985, and tackling company-enabled economic crime. To counter money laundering and complex financial misconduct, it will deploy artificial intelligence and advanced analytics, while deepening cryptoasset expertise. Recent results evidence impact: 77 criminal convictions, more than 1,000 director disqualifications, and £4m in compensation secured in 2024–25. See: LNB News 16/07/2025 55. Personal insolvency Can a bankruptcy petition be determined at a hearing fixed to consider a set-aside application? In what circumstances can a guarantee support...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK restructuring and insolvency: key judgments, office-holder decisions, litigation funding reform, procedural guidance, BBL data and key dates—weekly update, 5 June 2025

In this issue: Personal insolvency Corporate insolvency Document review Directors and insolvency Insolvency litigation Creditor's participation The office-holder International restructuring and insolvency Daily and weekly news alerts Key dates for restructuring and insolvency professionals New content Personal insolvency Judgment Alert: Mobile Telecommunications Company KSCP v Al Saud [2025] EWCA Civ 681 The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) rejected the petitioner’s application (Mobile Telecommunications Company KSCP) for permission to appeal the dismissal of its bankruptcy petition against Prince Hussam bin Saud bin Abdulaziz al Saud (Prince Hussam). The court found no realistic prospect that the petitioner could overturn the judge’s factual conclusions that, during the relevant three-year period preceding the petition, Prince Hussam did not have a ‘place of residence’ in England and Wales, as required by section 265(2)(b)(i) of the Insolvency Act 1986 to establish jurisdiction. The submission that mere access to accommodation would be enough was dismissed by the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Bankruptcy petition (Commercial)

PRACTICE NOTES
Comprehensive glossary of UK restructuring and insolvency terms, covering Companies Act schemes, Part 26A plans, IA 1986 processes, and cross‑border concepts including COMI, UNCITRAL and assimilated EU rules.

This glossary sets out numerous expressions regularly encountered in the restructuring & insolvency sphere. Words shown in bold within definitions are themselves explained in other entries in this glossary as well. A Article X The MLIJ contains a single provision named Article X, aimed at jurisdictions that have already implemented the MLCBI, like England, or are weighing its adoption. Article X states: ‘Not withstanding any prior interpretation to the contrary, the relief available under [insert a cross-reference to the legislation of this State enacting Article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency] includes recognition and enforcement of a judgment’ (see Practice Note: UNCITRAL model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments (MLIJ): Article X). Asset-backed security (ABS) A form of security anchored by asset pools, for example loans, leases, and credit card receivables. Assimilated law From 1 January 2024, ‘retained law’ has been retitled ‘assimilated law’. The body of domestic law originally arising from EU obligations, created by the European...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK Banking, Finance, Capital Markets, Derivatives and Insolvency Law Glossary including Islamic finance

Banking & Finance glossary A Auditing and Accounting Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) The foremost Islamic, international, autonomous, independent, not-for-profit corporate body that develops and issues accounting, auditing, governance, ethics and Shari’ah benchmarks and standards for Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs) and the wider Islamic finance sector. Founded in Bahrain in 1991, it is backed by a number of institutional members across more than 45 countries, including central banks and regulatory authorities, financial institutions, accounting and auditing practices, and legal firms. Its pronouncements are currently applied by leading Islamic financial institutions across the world and have advanced a progressive and gradual harmonisation of global Islamic finance practice. It also delivers professional qualification programmes—notably Certified Islamic Professional Accountant (CIPA), Certified Shari’ah Adviser and Auditor (CSAA), and the corporate compliance programme—in efforts to strengthen the industry’s human capital and governance frameworks. For further details, see Practice Note: Key participants in the Islamic finance industry—Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). Acceleration Acceleration is the formal action...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related UK Parliament Acts about Bankruptcy petition (Commercial)

UK PARLIAMENT ACTS
264 Who may present a bankruptcy petition

(1)     A petition for a bankruptcy order to be made against an individual may be presented to the court in accordance with the following provisions of this Part—(a)     by one of the individual's creditors or jointly by more than one of them,(b)     . . .[(ba)     . . .[(bb)     . . .]](c)     by the supervisor of, or any person (other than the individual) who is for the time being bound by, a voluntary arrangement proposed by the individual and approved under Part VIII, or(d)     where a criminal bankruptcy order has been

UK PARLIAMENT ACTS
381 "Bankrupt" and associated terminology

(1)     “Bankrupt” means an individual who has been [made] bankrupt and, in relation to a bankruptcy order, it means the individual [made] bankrupt by that order.[(1A)     Bankruptcy application” means an application to an adjudicator for a bankruptcy order.](2)     “Bankruptcy order” means an order [making] an individual bankrupt.(3)     “Bankruptcy petition” means a petition to the court for a bankruptcy order.

UK PARLIAMENT ACTS
[215 Rights of the scheme in insolvency]

[(1)     The compensation scheme may make provision—(a)     about the effect of a payment of compensation under the scheme on rights or obligations arising out of matters in connection with which the compensation was paid;(b)     giving the scheme manager a right of recovery in respect of those rights or obligations.](2)     Such a right of recovery conferred by the scheme does not, in the event of [a person's insolvency], exceed such right (if any) as the claimant would have had in that event.[(2A)     Any payment made by the scheme manager under section 214B(2) in connection with the exercise of a stabilisation power in respect of a bank, building society or credit union is to be treated as a debt due to the scheme manager from that bank, building society or (as the case may be) credit union.(2B)     In subsection (2)—“bank” has the meaning given in section