Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”

ParrisWhittaker

Access all documents on Bankruptcy restrictions undertaking (BRU)

Bankruptcy restrictions undertaking (BRU) meaning

What does Bankruptcy restrictions undertaking (BRU) mean?
A bankruptcy restrictions undertaking (BRU) is a voluntary, binding promise by a bankrupt to comply with the same restrictions as a bankruptcy restrictions order (BRO) for a set period, often beyond discharge, without a court order. Used where misconduct is alleged, it is often offered after the Official Receiver signals an intention to seek a BRO, resolving matters more quickly and at lower cost. It is a statutory mechanism: in England and Wales (Insolvency Act 1986, as amended) a BRU is given by the bankrupt and accepted by the Secretary of State (via the Insolvency Service/Official Receiver); in Scotland (Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016) by the Accountant in Bankruptcy; in Northern Ireland (Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989) by the Department for the Economy/Official Receiver. Key features: same legal effect as a BRO; duration, depending on seriousness and jurisdiction, up to 15 years; extends bankruptcy‑type restrictions (for example on obtaining credit, acting as a director or trading under another name); entered on the public insolvency register; breach is a criminal offence. In the Republic of Ireland, comparable restrictions arise only by court‑made Bankruptcy Restrictions Orders under the Bankruptcy Act 1988 (as amended); there is no BRU process.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Bankruptcy restrictions undertaking (BRU)

PRACTICE NOTES
Comprehensive glossary of UK restructuring and insolvency terms, covering Companies Act schemes, Part 26A plans, IA 1986 processes, and cross‑border concepts including COMI, UNCITRAL and assimilated EU rules.

This glossary sets out numerous expressions regularly encountered in the restructuring & insolvency sphere. Words shown in bold within definitions are themselves explained in other entries in this glossary as well. A Article X The MLIJ contains a single provision named Article X, aimed at jurisdictions that have already implemented the MLCBI, like England, or are weighing its adoption. Article X states: ‘Not withstanding any prior interpretation to the contrary, the relief available under [insert a cross-reference to the legislation of this State enacting Article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency] includes recognition and enforcement of a judgment’ (see Practice Note: UNCITRAL model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments (MLIJ): Article X). Asset-backed security (ABS) A form of security anchored by asset pools, for example loans, leases, and credit card receivables. Assimilated law From 1 January 2024, ‘retained law’ has been retitled ‘assimilated law’. The body of domestic law originally arising from EU obligations, created by the European...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Disqualified directors: prohibited roles under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, including company management and acting as an insolvency practitioner, and wider statutory restrictions

How can a director be disqualified? There are several routes by which a director can be disqualified, spanning various provisions of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) and the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). These include disqualification on bankruptcy and through a bankruptcy restrictions order (BRO) or a bankruptcy restrictions undertaking (BRU). For further guidance, refer to the following Practice Notes: Practice Note: How can a director be disqualified as a company director? Bankruptcy restrictions orders and undertakings—overview This Practice Note is not intended to cover every restriction arising from a BRO, BRU or bankruptcy. For full details, see the separate Practice Note: Effect and duration of bankruptcy restrictions orders (BROs). The scope here is limited to restrictions resulting from disqualification under CDDA 1986, section 6. It also excludes the restrictions under IA 1986, section 216 relating to prohibited names. For more on those provisions, see Practice Note: Prohibited names under section 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986...

Read More Right Arrow