Powered by Lexis+®

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“I'm able to do more in the day, which means I'm providing more value to my clients - and it's helped my margins in terms of how much I can bill. LexisNexis is helping me make money.”

ParrisWhittaker

Access all documents on Basic intent

Basic intent meaning

What does Basic intent mean?
Basic intent describes offences where the mens rea is met by intention as to the act itself or by recklessness, without any need to prove an ulterior or specific purpose. It is used in practice to contrast with “specific intent” offences. The term is not generally defined by statute; it is a descriptive, case law–led classification used across UK and Irish criminal law to organise rules on mens rea and certain defences. Typical examples include common assault and criminal damage. Practical significance: in England & Wales and Northern Ireland, under case law often referred to as the Majewski rule, voluntary intoxication is not a defence to crimes of basic intent, because recklessness suffices. By contrast, voluntary intoxication may, in principle, negate the higher mental element required for specific intent offences. Scotland does not routinely use the specific/basic taxonomy; however, voluntary intoxication is not a defence, and many offences are satisfied by intention or recklessness, producing similar outcomes. In Ireland, courts likewise treat voluntary intoxication as no defence to offences satisfied by recklessness, and the basic/specific intent distinction is recognised in practice. All offences not requiring a specific or ulterior intent are generally treated as offences of basic intent.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Basic intent

PRACTICE NOTES
Specific and Basic Intent: Definitions, Limits, Intoxication and Automatism Defences, and Indictment Drafting Guidance

Intention Intention denotes the result the defendant seeks. Offences are often categorised as ones of basic intent or specific intent. The Court of Appeal has labelled this division elusive. Even so, the Court offered guidance on specific intent: crimes of specific intent require proof of purpose or consequence, and include, though are not limited to, cases where the objective extends beyond the actus reus, sometimes called ulterior intent. The Court also endorsed the analysis that a line can be drawn between (i) intention considered in light of the actor’s purposes and (ii) intention viewed apart from those purposes. In some instances a general intent accompanying the act is all that is needed to constitute the offence; in others, in addition to that general intent, there must be a specific intent linked to the purpose for which the act is done. Put plainly, specific intent offences require an intention to secure something beyond the act itself, whereas basic intent offences require only an intention to carry out...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Letters of intent in construction: legal status, drafting safeguards including caps and expiry, incorporation of terms, alternatives, and leading case law

What is a letter of intent? Within construction and engineering projects, letters of intent enable an employer to mobilise a contractor before the employer is ready to enter the full building contract. They are often used to bridge the gap until the main contract can be finalised. The letter might simply direct the contractor to advance design and procurement for the scheme, or it may permit works to begin on site. The shape and complexity of such letters differ considerably, and vary widely. At its most basic, a letter of intent may only record a party’s present aim to enter a contract for construction works at a later date. Without more, that document amounts to no more than a non-binding expression of current intention, much like a comfort letter. However, the forms commonly used for contemporary construction arrangements are markedly more intricate and are designed to create contractual relations between the parties involved. See Turriff Construction v Regalia Knitting Mills (1971) 9 BLR 20 (not reported on LexisNexis®)...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
United States copyright law: joint authorship elements, default co-ownership and licensing rules, and collaboration agreement drafting

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived and not maintained. It was originally prepared for Lexis Practice Advisor®, in the US. It examines joint authorship and ownership of copyrights under US federal law, including the elements of joint authorship, the default rules that apply to joint authors, and drafting points for collaboration agreements. Joint authorship overview Before exploring the subtleties of joint authorship, it is useful to consider some fundamental copyright principles and how they relate to authorship. Basic copyright principles The Copyright Act grants authors of original works of authorship that are fixed in a tangible medium of expression a bundle of exclusive rights (ie a copyright) in their works for a period set by statute (ie the copyright term or duration). For more on exclusive rights, see Practice Note: US—exclusive rights of copyright owners [Archived]. For more on copyright duration, see Practice Note: US—copyright duration chart [Archived]. Breaking this down, for a work to attract copyright protection, it must be: original...

Read More Right Arrow