Powered by Lexis+®
Related Content
CASE STUDY

“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”

Jai Stern

Access all documents on Bluetooth

Bluetooth meaning

What does Bluetooth mean?
In legal practice, Bluetooth describes a short‑range wireless technology used to connect mobile phones, computers and other devices without cables, including Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) for low‑power and proximity uses. It operates over the 2.4 GHz band and is implemented to published standards overseen by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group. The term is descriptive rather than a defined legal concept; it is used across contracts, data protection, product compliance, cybersecurity and evidence. Key legal issues include: contractual specifications and IP licensing for Bluetooth profiles/versions; product and radio compliance (UK: Ofcom spectrum rules and the Radio Equipment Regulations 2017 with UKCA marking; Ireland/EU: ComReg rules and the Radio Equipment Directive 2014/53/EU with CE marking); privacy and data protection where BLE beacons, device identifiers and proximity data may constitute personal data under UK GDPR/GDPR, requiring a lawful basis, transparency, appropriate encryption and security, and, where relevant, DPIAs and breach notification; and evidential use of pairing records, logs and proximity data in civil and criminal proceedings, subject to disclosure and chain‑of‑custody principles. Usage and legal treatment are broadly consistent across the UK and Ireland.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Bluetooth

NEWS
FTT (Tax): company cars not pool cars; Class 1A NICs due; HMRC not estopped from applying statute; no inherent public law jurisdiction—legitimate expectation arguments rejected (Maywal)

MWL International Ltd and Maywal Ltd v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 402 (TC) The companies dealt in tangible commodities, sourcing from multiple overseas jurisdictions and supplying markets across the Middle East. From 1989 onwards, the company owned or leased vehicles that were luxury limousines fitted with telephone capability (using Bluetooth during the years under appeal). The cars were provided to clients visiting the UK and, at other times, were placed at the disposal of, and used by, one or more directors and employees, notably W, his spouse LW, and his son MW. Save for a single vehicle, the fleet was kept at the home of W and LW, which also functioned as the company’s registered office. In 2021 HMRC issued determinations imposing Class 1A NICs in relation to the vehicles, and the company brought an appeal. It maintained that the vehicles met the statutory requirements to qualify as pool cars, or, alternatively, that a 1993 agreement meant either HMRC was estopped from asserting they were not pool cars, or the...

Read More Right Arrow