Bonds meaning

This Checklist This Checklist highlights key matters to weigh up when preparing and finalising a retention bond for a construction scheme. For additional guidance on retention bonds, see Practice Note: Retention bonds. Parties A party whose registered office is outside England and Wales may need to nominate an address for service within England and Wales. Consider carefully before accepting a surety located beyond the UK and, where relevant, confirm the surety is properly authorised to issue bonds in the UK. Always include company registration numbers to enable future identification of the companies. ...

This checklist outlines matters to weigh up when preparing and agreeing an advance payment bond for a construction project. See also Practice Note: Advance payment bonds. Parties Where a party has its registered office outside England and Wales, it may need to nominate a service address within England and Wales. Consider carefully before accepting a surety located outside the UK and, where relevant, verify the surety is properly authorised to issue bonds in the UK. Always include company registration numbers so companies can be identified in the future. The relevant contract Set out the full particulars of the building contract and the works to which the advance payment bond applies, as appropriate...

What this checklist covers This checklist sets out the principal matters a solicitor guiding a first time issuer must verify and, where appropriate, propose changes to, when reviewing English law terms and conditions governing an issue of debt securities...

Bayerische Landesbank and another v Ruschemalliance LLC [2024] EWHC 1822 (Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? In keeping with comparable determinations, this judgment succinctly sets out the jurisdictional thresholds and principal considerations the court applies when evaluating applications for anti‑suit injunctions. It underscores the judiciary’s practical bent and operates as a constructive illustration of inter‑court co‑ordination, projecting a clear signal where numerous contests flow from identical underlying events, even though such matters are dealt with at varying moments and tiers of the court structure. In sum, the outcome reasserts the English courts’ steadfast commitment to upholding arbitration, including in circumstances where the arbitral seat is situated in a foreign state. What was the background? In 2021, the defendant, Ruschemalliance LLC (“RCA”), a Russian entity, entered into two Engineering, Procurement and Construction agreements for the development of liquefied natural gas and gas processing plant facilities in Russia. The obligations owed by RCA’s counterparties, the German companies Linde GmbH and Renaissance Heavy Industries LLC (together,...

LLC Eurochem North-West-2 and another company v Societe Generale S.A. and other companies [2025] EWHC 1938 (Comm) This is a highly important decision for practitioners dealing with international sanctions, as the court delivers a detailed examination of how EU sanctions interface with domestic sanctions authorities in such circumstances. It also provides an in-depth consideration of the notions of ‘ownership’ and ‘control’ for the purpose of sanctions, including where trust arrangements feature, which is not unusual when there is a link to a designated individual. The ruling is likewise of real assistance to those working with performance bonds and related trade finance instruments in the sanctions context. The background facts The relevant parties The dispute stemmed from six on-demand bonds (Bonds) issued in 2021 and 2022 by Société Générale (SocGen) and ING Bank (ING) (the Banks) in favour of EuroChem North-West-2 (EuroChem NW2), a Russian entity. The Bonds were issued under contracts between EuroChem NW2 and Tecnimont S.P.A (Tecnimont), an Italian engineering company, and its Russian affiliate...

ISPVs enable insurers to reduce their exposure to significant events, including natural catastrophes, by passing risk to private investors via catastrophe bonds, or 'cat bonds'. Shoib Khan, the central bank’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) director for insurance supervision, said the PRA will outline later this year how it plans to shorten approval times for submitted cat bond applications to ten working days, down from the current four to six weeks. Speaking at the Bank of America Securities Annual Financials CEO Conference, Khan added that the PRA intends to consult later this year on creating a new, accelerated pathway for catastrophe bond applications...

The way consideration payable for buying shares is arranged is rarely simple or linear, and can vary considerably. In many situations payment is postponed, deferred, or made conditional on a particular contingency being satisfied. Selling shareholders will look to maximise the overall price for their shares while also seeking to limit, so far as possible, any tax on disposal by: making full and efficient use of available reliefs to cut or remove any charge, and/or delaying the point in time at which any such tax becomes due However, where the consideration is deferred, the seller can become liable to tax immediately on an amount not yet received (a ‘dry’ tax charge). In calculating chargeable gains, no discount is usually allowed in respect of any consideration that is ascertainable at the date of disposal, even where it is: deferred subject to a contingency, or at risk of not being received for any reason Where any deferred...

What does this Practice Note cover? The primary emphasis of this Practice Note is on debt securities (such as bonds or notes) and it provides an introduction to: trading, settlement and custody of debt securities in the UK, and the key UK regulatory frameworks that govern these activities This Practice Note also highlights the main categories of relevant service providers and summarises the UK regulatory frameworks applicable to them. For a quick summary of how the debt capital markets are regulated in the UK, see Practice Note: EU and UK regulation of the debt capital markets—one minute guide. For information on the debt securities market infrastructure in the EU, see Practice Note: EU Debt securities market infrastructure. Introduction The importance of tradeability of debt securities Tradeability is a fundamental attribute of debt securities. Investors’ ability to purchase and sell—trade—debt securities depends on: standardisation of the terms and conditions of debt securities (for more information, see Practice...

The capital gains regime allows corporate groups to organise the offset of allowable losses arising in one group company against taxable gains arising in another. The most straightforward route is to elect to move a gain or a loss between companies within the group. That election rests on the premise that group members function, in many ways, as a single economic unit, and that the tax code ought to mirror that reality. The purpose of the provisions is to enable groups to net gains and losses against each other where both the gains and the losses arise within the same group. This treatment is not meant to apply to companies acquired into a group specifically because they already carry losses. The pre-entry loss rules exist to stop groups from cutting their gains by purchasing losses in this fashion. Although intended to counter avoidance, the pre-entry loss rules can bite regardless of whether the parties involved are driven by tax motives, and they apply even where tax considerations are not the...

Agreement concerning [ insert brief details of the works/project ] at [ insert address of works ] (incorporating, among other things, the JCT Standard Building Sub-Contract Agreement 2024 (SBCSub/A 2024) and the JCT Standard Building Sub-Contract Conditions 2024 (SBCSub/C 2024), each as amended and supplemented as set out in this Agreement and in the Schedules to it). This Agreement is dated the [ insert number ] day of [ insert month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties [ insert name of the Contractor ] (company registration number [ insert number ]), whose registered office is at [ insert address of the Contractor ] (“the Contractor”) [ insert name of the Sub-Contractor ] (company registration number [ insert number ]), whose registered office is at [ insert address of the Sub-Contractor ] (“the Sub-Contractor”) Now it is agreed that: 1 Interpretation In this Agreement, words and expressions carry the meanings respectively attributed to them in the JCT SBCSub/A 2024 and...

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract Without Quantities for use in Scotland 2016 published by the SBCC subject to the following amendments: Recitals and Articles updated: contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; CDP responsibility accepted; Principal Contractor duties priced; arbitration deleted; Schedule of Amendments prevails; Third Party Agreements duties. Contract Particulars: arbitration entries removed; Rectification Period set at 12 months; fluctuations and certain PII/guarantee entries deleted. Conditions: key definitions revised (Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design sub‑contractors, Funder, Site); Scottish jurisdiction; approvals mean principles only; entire agreement; variations in writing. Design/materials/programming: contractor accepts ER/CP; quality and non‑deleterious materials; programme reporting; site risk; drawings/info supply; tighter discrepancy notices. Time/defects: mitigate and advise on delay; narrower Relevant Events; Practical Completion clarified; stronger rectification, consequential damage and indemnity; phased as‑built/occupation information. IP/confidentiality/BIM: broader licence, moral rights waivers and delivery; confidentiality reinforced; BIM where adopted. Management/sub‑contracting: access, approved Site Manager, meetings; prescribed sub‑contracts; collateral warranties/third‑party rights; CDM duties; insurance...

ARCHIVED: This Precedent is archived and is not being maintained. The Contract consists of the completed Design and Build Contract 2011 Edition published by the JCT (as amended by Amendment 1: CDM Regulations 2015), and is subject to the following amendments: RECITALS Third Recital Delete and replace with: ‘The Contractor has: reviewed the Site and satisfied himself regarding its measurements, position and other pertinent matters; considered the Employer’s Requirements and is satisfied that the Contractor’s Proposals and Contract Sum Analysis will fulfil the Employer’s Requirements; and accepted responsibility for the whole of the design contained in the Employer’s Requirements and the Contractor’s Proposals.’ ARTICLES Article 1 After ‘shall’ insert ‘carry out and’...