Capital value meaning

Tax consequences of different buyback structures The table below offers a concise overview of the tax outcomes arising from the various forms of share buyback that a UK company may undertake. Throughout, it is assumed that the relevant shareholder is UK resident and that the repurchased shares are held as an investment. For fuller guidance on the tax treatment of share buybacks, see the following Practice Notes: Tax consequences of share buybacks—main rules Tax consequences of share buybacks—calculating the income capital split Tax consequences of share buybacks—unquoted trading companies For a comparative table setting out other ways a company can return value to shareholders, together with the principal UK tax issues for each route, see: Key UK tax considerations for returning value to shareholders—comparative table. Note that tailored provisions apply where the company repurchasing its shares is a qualifying asset holding company. For more on this, refer to Practice Note: Qualifying asset holding companies (QAHCs)—tax treatment...

The table below outlines various ways a company may return value to shareholders and provides a summary of the principal UK tax considerations applicable to each arrangement...

Checklist This Checklist applies when acquiring a long leasehold interest carrying a capital value, rather than a shorter tenancy at an open market rent, which is unlikely to attract any capital value. A purchaser’s solicitor should examine the landlord’s right to forfeit the lease, as in some situations particular forfeiture clauses can render a lease unacceptable as security to a lender and, in turn, unsuitable for purchase. Could the landlord exercise forfeiture upon the tenant’s insolvency? Where the landlord holds a right to forfeit on a tenant insolvency event, the property will not be acceptable security to a lender and is therefore inappropriate as an investment acquisition. Consequently, such a lease is neither appropriate for lending purposes nor for any purchase...

Mergers The Commission approved Brookfield Corporation’s takeover of sole control of Oaktree Capital Group Holdings, LLC (M.12284) following a phase I review—see further, Midday Express The Commission received filings for: Clarios/Ecobat Germany/Ecobat Austria (M.12145) (ordinary merger procedure) JLL/PIF/FMTECH (M.12358) (simplified merger procedure) NOTE—For all active merger probes before the Commission, see further, EU mergers—ongoing cases tracker Competition policy The Commission stated that Executive Vice-President, Teresa Ribera, convened an implementation dialogue on the effects of mergers, productivity, sustainability, and the cost of living—see further, implementation dialogue and Midday Express NOTE—For all current EU competition law legislative, guidance and wider policy work, see further, EU competition horizon scanning—2026 and beyond State aid The Commission adopted a decision under the Clean Industrial Deal State Aid Framework (CISAF) authorising a Spanish measure (valued at €200m) to back strategic investments expanding manufacturing capacity across the electric...

The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v HMRC [2024] EWCA Civ 300 The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd (Prudential) acted as the representative member of its VAT group. Another company in the group, Silverfleet Capital Ltd (SCL), executed an investment management services contract to provide services to Prudential. Under that contract, SCL was also eligible for a management fee and deferred performance fees once a specified hurdle rate was achieved. Under section 43 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994), no VAT was payable on the management fee because they were in the same VAT group. In 2007, SCL exited the VAT group. In 2014 and 2015, the triggers for paying the further deferred performance fee were satisfied and SCL invoiced Prudential for over £9m in total. The question before the Court of Appeal was whether those additional performance fees ultimately constituted consideration for a supply made while both companies were members of the same VAT group or, alternatively, whether the services amounted to a continuous supply of services...

On 2 August 2024, the PPF announced that Kodak Alaris had been reorganised under its ownership and was now ‘performing well’. The consideration for the transaction was not revealed. The PPF added, ‘this is standard practice for pension scheme assets we take on, and, after a thorough process, we are pleased to have secured a good outcome for all parties’...

For both the investing private equity fund and the target’s leadership, the prime lure of a private equity-backed buyout is the chance to crystallise a meaningful gain on exit. There are several potential paths to exit from such an investment, most typically: a trade sale to another company operating within the same sector, a flotation (IPO), or a secondary buyout (SBO). The ultimate route will hinge on considerations such as public market appetite for a listing and whether credible purchasers are available. Management often influence the decision, and may favour renewed private equity support via an SBO when the business model and prevailing market backdrop align. A secondary buyout (SBO) is, in essence, a private equity-backed acquisition of a company that has already undergone a private equity-backed buyout. In an SBO, the existing private equity owner exits its stake, though the current management team can remain in post afterwards. Alternatively, fresh management might be appointed, or a blend of old and new...

What is land remediation relief? (LRR) LRR provides corporation tax relief on expenditure incurred in remediating contaminated land or in bringing derelict sites back into use. In 2009, the regime was broadened to address market failure by returning long-term derelict land to use, bringing such sites back into use. An incentive applies where land, whose development has been affected by various kinds of continuing dereliction, is brought back into productive use. The extension was intended to correct market failure by encouraging activity on sites blighted by ongoing dereliction. The relief was at risk of being discontinued after 2012; however, the 2012 Budget confirmed it would continue. The October 2024 HM Treasury Corporate Tax Roadmap, published alongside Autumn Budget 2024, notes the new Labour government’s commitment to a brownfield-first approach, prioritising the development of previously used land wherever possible. Given the time since the last review of LRR, and the potential for it to help progress the government’s objectives, the Roadmap announced that a consultation would be launched to...

Principal private residence relief Where an individual holds more than one residence, they may, by formally giving notice to HMRC, nominate which property is to be treated as their main residence for principal private residence (PPR) relief purposes. In these circumstances, any period of actual ownership (by election) of the elected PPR should be regarded as fully exempt from capital gains tax (CGT), provided there has been a previous period of actual occupation. In addition, the last nine months of the period of ownership are always deemed to be a period of occupation. Before 6 April 2014, the exemption covered the final 36 months of ownership; it was reduced to 18 months from 6 April 2014, and halved again to nine months for disposals on or after 6 April 2020. Individuals who are disabled or residing in a care home, and who have no other property on which PPR relief can be claimed, continue to benefit from the 36‑month final period exemption...

This [ Agreement OR DEED ] is entered into on [ insert day and month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties [ insert name of buyer ] [ of [ insert address ] OR trading as [ insert trading name ] of [ insert address ] OR a firm with its principal place of business at [ insert address of firm ] OR [ an LLP OR a company ] incorporated in [ insert place of incorporation, eg England and Wales ] with registered number [ insert registered number ] whose registered office is at [ insert address ] ] (the Buyer); and [ insert name of seller ] [ of [ insert address ] OR trading as [ insert trading name ] of [ insert address ] OR a firm with its principal place of business at [ insert address of firm ] OR [ an LLP OR a company ] incorporated in [ insert place of incorporation, eg England and Wales ] with...

The Directors, [ Insert name of company ] [ Limited OR PLC ], company number [ insert company number ] (the Company), [ Insert registered office of company ], [ Insert date ] To: The Directors Waiver of dividend[s] [ I OR We ], [ insert name ] of [ insert address or registered office ] [ and [ insert name ] of [ insert address or registered office ] ], [ am OR are ] the [ joint ] registered holder[s] of [ insert number of shares ] [ insert class of shares ] shares of [ insert nominal value ] each in the capital of the Company (the Shares)...

ORDINARY RESOLUTION THAT [ subject to and contingent upon [ insert any conditions relating to the exercise of the authority to sub-divide shares ], ] [ [ insert number ] OR the whole of the ] [ insert class ] shares of [ insert nominal value ] each in the capital of the Company [ held by [ insert name ] ] [ , bearing numbers [ insert number ] to [ insert number ] inclusive, ] be split into [ insert number ] [ insert class ] shares of [ insert nominal value ] each [ , bearing numbers [ insert number ] to [ insert number ] inclusive ] , with the rights and restrictions attaching to those shares (save as to nominal value) remaining unaltered by such sub-division...

Sale by PRs or appropriation to beneficiaries We understand you are asking when it is better for the personal representatives (PRs) to dispose of an estate property, or instead to appropriate it to the beneficiaries so that they handle the sale themselves. This choice typically arises where: the beneficiary(ies) has/have part or all of their capital gains tax (CGT) annual exemption available the beneficiary(ies) will pay CGT at 18% on any part of a gain the beneficiary(ies) has/have losses available to offset against any gain the sale will make a loss and the PRs will not be making any further disposals that may produce gains to utilise the loss A death is not usually a chargeable occasion for CGT. For these purposes the PRs are treated as acquiring the assets at market value on the date of death; effectively, all prior accrued gains are eliminated and the PRs start again with a clean slate...

Under the Capital Funding Guide issued by Homes England, where a development lies within a designated protected area (DPA) and benefits from grant, the registered provider (RP) granting a shared ownership lease must include one of two provisions: limit staircasing to a maximum of 80%; or if staircasing beyond 80% is permitted, require the leaseholder to sell their share back to the landlord (or a nominee that is also an RP) at market value when they wish to sell. In certain cases, a local authority can seek a waiver of these conditions from Homes England where the supply of shared ownership homes is no longer constrained. Notwithstanding guidance suggesting one of the above clauses is mandatory for every shared ownership lease in a DPA, our understanding is that the applicable regulations do not impose this where the site has not received grant. For more detail, see: Practice Note: Entitlements under shared ownership leases Housing (Shared Ownership Leases)...

We take it that both buyer and seller are unconnected third parties, dealing at arm’s length for these purposes; the asset being conveyed is situated in England and Wales; and the effective date is the date of completion. Although the seller might have a charge secured over its interest in the property, that does not automatically mean the sale to the buyer is caught by that charge by itself. Whether it is depends on what the parties agree. As a rule, a transfer is not taken subject to an existing mortgage. The notes below consider a transfer that is subject to a mortgage, and one that is not. Transfer subject to seller’s existing mortgage Where a property is conveyed to a buyer subject to the seller’s subsisting mortgage, the purchaser assumes the seller’s liability...