Case management hearing meaning

Before commencing the arbitration Check limits; confirm SIAC clause; interim relief; tribunal size; proper nominations. Emergency measures Seek Emergency Arbitrator pre-constitution; urgent, Registrar-approved, binding relief. Expedited Procedure Apply pre-constitution; expect sole arbitrator, streamlined process, six‑month award. Commencing the arbitration Serve Notice on Registrar/respondent with required particulars, funding statement, fee. Responding to the arbitration Respond within 14 days; address claims, jurisdiction and counterclaims. Jurisdiction Arbitration proceeds unless screened; tribunal rules; object under Rule 31. Preliminary meeting and directions Attend administrative calls; hold early case management conference. Written statements File Claim, Defence, Counterclaim as directed; state facts, grounds, relief. Evidence Tribunal controls evidence; written testimony allowed; oral examination on request. The hearing Any party may...

This Checklist This checklist reviews the procedural and related issues the tribunal is expected to address at a preliminary meeting in arbitration, whether the process is ad hoc or under an arbitral institution. Matters typically cover jurisdictional objections, applications for interim measures or the trial of preliminary points, setting schedules for the progress of elements of the reference, and organising how all the evidence will be exchanged and presented. Whatever the forum—ad hoc or institutional—and whichever institutional rules govern, the tribunal will usually convene a preliminary meeting soon after it is formed. The parties themselves (rather than their advisers) are generally not obliged to attend this session, although it is advantageous if they do, as they will meet the tribunal and confront the opposing team at an early juncture. In international cases, it may also be one of the few chances for everyone involved to be physically together before the main hearing, and it may provide a window for separate settlement discussions. Whether that is suitable can depend on...

Before commencing the arbitration Review relevant limitation deadlines and contractual time limits under the substantive law governing the dispute (a general matter outside the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules) Examine the claims you intend to advance in an UNCITRAL arbitration, confirming they fall within the arbitration clause that refers disputes to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (Article 1(1)) (ad hoc) Decide whether to accept or suggest an appointing authority to handle the appointment of arbitrators and related challenges in accordance with the Rules (Article 6)...

Stage 1—preparing to bring a claim and pre-action matters Guidance on UK trade mark infringement, offences, passing off, interim injunctions, running IP disputes, privilege, dispute resolution (mediation and arbitration), and the Disclosure Scheme; plus checklists and forms (injunction, application, hearing) Stage 2—Letter before action alleging infringement Notes on infringement, passing off, unjustified threats and drafting; includes a trade mark letter of claim precedent Stage 3—commencing proceedings Procedure, defences and exceptions, IPEC flowchart, pleadings and initial disclosure precedents, and CPR/Part 36 forms Stage 4—case management Procedure and Disclosure Scheme notes, court guides (Chancery, Patents Court, IPEC and Small Claims), and case management questionnaires, Disclosure Review Document, Certificate of Compliance, budgets and directions Stage 5—disclosure and evidence Surveys and witness evidence (PD 57AC), privilege, disclosure (including electronic) and flexible trials; witness statement and Extended Disclosure precedents; affidavits, applications and certificates Stage 6—trial...

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Costs and funding Litigation Case management Evidence and disclosure ADR Scottish Dispute Resolution New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Dispute Resolution Highlights 2025/2026 Key DR developments Alternative dispute resolution European Parliament adopts new rules to modernise out-of-court dispute resolution for consumers The European Parliament has approved refreshed measures to enhance consumer out-of-court complaint handling, updating the EU’s ADR framework for the digital landscape and cross-border disputes. The reforms delineate ADR’s reach to cover matters arising both before and after contractual agreements, and in specified circumstances enable involvement by traders from third countries. The directive will come into force 20 days following publication and will begin to apply 32 months thereafter. For more, see: Parliament adopts new rules to modernise out-of-court dispute resolution for consumers—LNB News 16/12/2025 Court information HMCTS update hearing...

In this issue Key DR developments Claims and remedies Costs and funding Litigation Applications—general Evidence and disclosure Appeals New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments CPR Committee minutes Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting—6 June 2025: The Civil Procedure Rule Committee met on 6 June 2025 in a hybrid session at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference. The minutes confirm a forthcoming CPR 51 pilot enabling non-parties to obtain court documents, arising from the Supreme Court ruling in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring [2019] UKSC 38. They also record approved amendments to the e‑working pilot, progressing towards a permanent electronic filing system as part of ongoing court modernisation. Further topics included summary assessment of costs, arbitration updates, disclosure, civil restraint orders, closed material procedures, judicial review reforms for infrastructure projects, whiplash reforms, digital services and other procedural...

Andrew Scott KC of Blackstone Chambers, counsel for BHP Andrew Scott KC said the planned appeal poses the issue of whether seeking anti‑suit relief in a foreign court, linked to proceedings in England, could amount to criminal contempt. Scott told the Court of Appeal that no English authority indicates that it could. BHP has lodged an appeal against a decision by Judge Adam Constable. In June 2025, sitting in the High Court, he held that BHP must confront allegations that it attempted to impede the municipalities’ access to justice in England by supporting proceedings in Brazil’s highest court that might frustrate compensation claims. The municipalities argue that BHP is in contempt of court for agreeing to finance a claim initiated by Ibram, a Brazilian mining association, before the South American country’s Federal Supreme Court in 2024...

This Practice Note examines when parties may agree to extend the period for complying with a rule, practice direction or court order that obliges them to take a step within a fixed timeframe and sets out the consequences of any default. For wider guidance on extensions of time, including matters falling outside CPR 3.8(4), see Practice Note: Extension of time. This Practice Note should also be read alongside material addressing the court’s response to party non-compliance and applications for relief from sanction arising from such breaches, which can be found in: Compliance and relief from sanctions—overview. Agreeing an extension of time under CPR 3.8(4) CPR 3.8(4) allows the parties, by prior written agreement, to extend the deadline for performing an act specified by the CPR or a court order where the consequences of failure are prescribed. Any such extension is limited to a maximum of 28 days and must not place any hearing date at risk (CPR 3.8(3) and CPR 3.8(4))...

Insurance & Reinsurance case tracker—2018 [Archived] ARCHIVED: This resource has been archived and is no longer being updated. It collates insurance-related litigation in the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union (including both the General Court and the Court of Justice). Drawn from our monitoring and examination of relevant proceedings, and at times reports from our own court correspondents, the tracker brings key cases together swiftly in one place. It records the status of matters covered since January 2018, including upcoming hearings, and ordinarily received updates every fortnight. Abbreviations European Court of Justice/Court of Justice of the European Union — ECJ Court of Justice of the European Union — General Court — CJEU-GC Supreme Court — SC Court of Appeal — CA High Court — HC Privy Council — PC Queen's Bench Division — QBD For previous years, see: Insurance & Reinsurance case tracker—2017...

A central aim of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 (CrimPR 2025), SI 2025/909, is the efficient management of criminal proceedings. In CrimPR 2025, SI 2025/909, Pt 3 sets out the detailed provisions on active case management. CrimPR 2025, SI 2025/909, rr 3.1–3.15 apply to all matters in the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court alike. CrimPR 2025, SI 2025/909, rr 3.16–3.18 relate specifically to cases in the magistrates’ court. See Practice Note: Case management in the magistrates’ courts. CrimPR 2025, SI 2025/909, rr 3.19–3.34 govern Crown Court cases and are explained in this Practice Note. The CrimPR provide for two principal types of case management hearing in the Crown Court, which are outlined in greater detail below: plea and trial preparation hearings (PTPHs), and further case management hearings (FCMHs) An FCMH should be listed only where a case is complex in nature. Consequently, in the majority of cases, after the PTPH the next occasion before the court will be the trial hearing....

At the Family Court held at [ Court name ] Case No: [ Case number ] Non-Molestation Order The Family Law Act 1996 Full name(s) of the child(ren)Boy or girlDate(s) of birth [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] Before [ name of judge ], in private, on [ date ] at a [ type of hearing ] Important notice to the respondent, [ RESPONDENT NAME ] of [ RESPONDENT address ] You are required to comply with this order. Please read it thoroughly. If any part is unclear, seek advice from a solicitor, a Legal Advice Centre or the Citizens Advice Bureau. You have the right to ask the court to vary or discharge this order. Warning: without reasonable excuse, doing anything this order prohibits amounts to a criminal offence; on conviction you may be liable to imprisonment for a...

Agenda for case management hearing (England and Wales) Click below to get the Word edition of the Agenda for case management (England and Wales): Agenda for case management hearing (England and Wales)—Word version. Click to get the PDF edition of the Agenda for case management (England and Wales): Agenda for case management hearing (England and Wales)—PDF version. For Welsh versions, see: Agenda Rheoli Achosion (Cymru a Lloegr)—Cymraeg—Word Agenda Rheoli Achosion (Cymru a Lloegr)—Cymraeg—PDF ...

At the Family Court convened at [ Court name ] Case Number: [ Case number ] Occupation Order under the Family Law Act 1996. Full name(s) of the child(ren), Boy or Girl. Date(s) of birth: [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ] [ Insert ]. Before [ name of judge ], heard in private on [ date ] at a [ type of hearing ]. Important notice to the respondent, [ RESPONDENT name ] of [ RESPONDENT address ]. You are required to comply with this order. Please read it very carefully. If any part is unclear, seek advice from a solicitor, a Legal Advice Centre, or the Citizens Advice Bureau. You are entitled to ask the court to vary or discharge the order. Warning: Alternatively, if you breach this order, you MAY BE FOUND TO BE IN contempt of court and you could be IMPRISONED, fined, or have your assets taken...

Can the respondent refuse to agree the stay unless the applicant pays the costs incurred by the respondent? What factors will the Tribunal consider in deciding whether or not to agree the stay? The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) is a statutory creation, with authority derived from the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA 2007), which established it, and the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, SI 2013/1169 (the Property Chamber Rules). Importantly, the decision to impose a stay does not rest with the parties. That is a defined case management power conferred on the FTT by the Property Chamber Rules (SI 2013/1169, r 6(3)(m)). When exercising its powers, the Tribunal must give effect to the overriding objective, requiring cases to be handled fairly and justly (SI 2013/1169, r 3(1) and (3)). Consequently, a respondent cannot make agreement to a stay contingent upon the applicant meeting the respondent’s costs; whether a stay should be granted is a matter for the FTT to decide in line with its...