Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“It's hard to quantify, right now. But at a guess, I'd say it's probably more than 50% faster, at times. It's literally that quick. We've found to be an essential practical tool. We're very satisfied.”

Walsall Council

Access all documents on Central Counterparties (CCPs)

Central Counterparties (CCPs) meaning

What does Central Counterparties (CCPs) mean?
A central counterparty (CCP), or central counterparty clearing house, is the clearing house that interposes itself between trading parties, novating the contract so it becomes buyer to every seller and seller to every buyer. By doing so it manages counterparty credit and settlement risk: if a clearing member or client defaults, the CCP uses posted collateral (initial and variation margin), default fund contributions and its own capital (the default waterfall) to meet obligations and continue settlement. The concept and regulatory framework are set out in EMIR (Regulation (EU) 648/2012) and, in the UK, the onshored version (UK EMIR). EMIR also imposes a clearing obligation for specified OTC derivatives. CCPs are authorised and supervised by the Bank of England in the UK, and in Ireland by the national competent authority with ESMA oversight. Non‑UK/EU CCPs require recognition to clear for firms in these jurisdictions. CCPs centrally clear exchange‑traded and certain OTC derivatives, as well as cash equities and bonds, reducing bilateral exposures through multilateral netting and daily mark‑to‑market. They operate through clearing members, with client clearing arrangements governed by clearing rules and client asset protections. Usage and legal effect are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Central Counterparties (CCPs)

NEWS
UK special resolution regime for central counterparties (CCPs): new Practice Note with overview and Banking Act 2009 context for banks and building societies

Special resolution regime for central counterparties Consult Practice Note: Special resolution regime for central counterparties. For a summary of the special resolution...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK and EU financial services update: FCA regulatory priorities (insurance), ESMA EMIR 3 and CFD measures, FATF priorities, CSRD/CS3D simplification, and BoE CHAPS early settlement extension (24 February 2026)

Financial services developments ESMA consults on CCP collateral and investment policy standards following EMIR 3 review The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has initiated a public consultation on draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) to amend Commission Delegated Regulation 153/2013, following the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR 3) review. The call for input invites feedback on: conditions for central counterparties (CCPs) to accept public guarantees, public bank guarantees and commercial bank guarantees as collateral; criteria under which debt instruments qualify as eligible financial instruments within CCP investment policy; highly secured arrangements for emission allowances lodged as margins or default fund contributions. EMIR 3 makes permanent a broader range of guarantees eligible as collateral and extends scope to clients of CCPs that are non-financial counterparties. The consultation closes on 30 April 2026, with ESMA submitting final draft RTS to European Commission by end-2026...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
EU and UK financial services update: EMIR 3 CCP collateral RTS; ESMA CFD product intervention scope; CSRD/CS3D simplification; FATF priorities; BoE to extend CHAPS hours from September 2027

EU financial services developments ESMA consults on CCP collateral and investment policy standards following EMIR 3 review The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has opened a public consultation on draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) intended to amend Commission Delegated Regulation 153/2013, following the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR 3) review process. It also invites feedback on the circumstances under which central counterparties (CCPs) may accept public guarantees, public bank guarantees, and commercial bank guarantees as collateral; the criteria under which debt instruments qualify as eligible financial instruments for a CCP’s investment policy; and the use of highly secured arrangements for emission allowances lodged as margins or default fund contributions. EMIR 3 permanently widens the categories of guarantees recognised as eligible collateral and expands the framework to include clients of CCPs that are non-financial counterparties. The call for input closes on 30 April 2026, with ESMA expected to submit the final draft RTS to the European Commission for consideration by end-2026...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Central Counterparties (CCPs)

PRACTICE NOTES
Recognition of UK CCPs under EU EMIR: post-Brexit equivalence extensions and ESMA tiering decisions to 2028

This FLASHCARD is designed to help you take in and retrieve the essential points on the recognition of UK central counterparties (CCPs) under Regulation (EU) 648/2012 (EU EMIR). How did Brexit affect the EU market for clearing services? Before Brexit, three UK CCPs—London Clearing House (LCH), LME Clear and ICE Clear Europe—held a dominant role in the EU market for derivatives clearing. As at June 2017, it was estimated that UK CCPs cleared roughly 90% of euro-denominated interest rate swaps for euro area counterparties, and 40% of their euro-denominated credit default swaps. When the implementation period ended on 31 December 2020, UK CCPs were no longer under EU supervision and became third country CCPs for the purposes of EU EMIR. Article 25(1) of EU EMIR provides that a...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK CCP Special Resolution Regime under FSMA 2023: Stabilisation Options, Statutory Tear-up, Safeguards, Bank of England Powers and Instruments

Background to Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (FSMA 2023) delivers significant reforms to the UK’s regulatory architecture for financial services. It cancels retained/assimilated EU-derived rules in this field and empowers HM Treasury, alongside the financial services regulators, to substitute them with measures tailored for UK markets, building on the UK’s established regulatory model (see Practice Note: The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023—essentials). The accompanying Explanatory Notes explain that FSMA 2023 preserves the UK’s status as a competitive marketplace with strong regulatory standards by, among other steps, giving the Bank of England (BoE) new instruments to lessen risks arising from the failure of critical financial institutions. FSMA 2023 obtained Royal Assent on 2 June 2023, yet different provisions commence on varying dates, as indicated in section 86 and in subsequent commencement statutory instruments (SIs). Parts of the special resolution regime (SRR) for central counterparties (CCPs) began to apply from 29 August 2023, although a commencement SI is still awaited for the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK bank resolution: Special Resolution Regime tools, preconditions, insolvency routes and 2025 FSCS-funded recapitalisation reforms

Special resolution regime toolkit The Bank of England (BoE) leads the response when banks, building societies and designated investment firms supervised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) fail, using a process called resolution, which is separate from insolvency, and is described in the Bank of England’s approach to resolution (published 15 December 2023). The BoE will trigger resolution where intervention is required to safeguard financial stability. The framework does not aim to prevent all failures; rather, it ensures that, when they occur, they are managed in an orderly way that seeks to avoid deploying public money to prop up failed banks. Under the special resolution regime (SRR), the most suitable tool must be chosen for resolving or winding up a failed bank, including combinations of tools where appropriate. Through secondary legislation implementing the Financial Services Act 2012 and the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive 2014/59/EU (EU BRRD), the SRR has been extended, with modifications, to building societies and investment firms. In addition, recognised central counterparties (CCPs) are subject to...

Read More Right Arrow