Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“We rely on LexisNexis to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients.”

Shelter

Access all documents on Certificate of contested validity

Certificate of contested validity meaning

Published by a LexisNexis IP expert
What does Certificate of contested validity mean?
A certificate of contested validity is a court order confirming that a patent’s validity has already been challenged in litigation and upheld. In the UK, it is a statutory mechanism under section 65 of the Patents Act 1977. The court may grant it where validity was put in issue (for example, in infringement proceedings with an invalidity counterclaim or in revocation proceedings) and the patent, or specified claims, was found valid. Its key effect is on costs in later cases: if, in subsequent proceedings, a party again contests the validity of the certified patent claims and loses on that issue, the patentee is ordinarily entitled to costs on the indemnity basis for the validity issue, unless the court directs otherwise. This deters repeat or unmeritorious validity challenges. Grant is discretionary, not automatic, and is typically sought at judgment or in consequential orders. Practice is consistent across England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (Patents Court, IPEC, Court of Session and High Court of Northern Ireland). In Ireland, the term is not used in legislation and there is no direct statutory equivalent. Irish courts retain broad discretion on costs in patent validity disputes under the Patents Act 1992 and court rules.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Certificate of contested validity

PRACTICE NOTES
Singapore registered designs and protected international designs: revocation, validity, ownership and infringement—procedures and remedies before the Registrar and High Court

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. This Practice Note was originally prepared for LexisAdvance® Practical Guidance Singapore. An interested person may apply to the Registrar of Designs (Registrar) or the High Court to revoke a design registration on the grounds that: the design was not new on the date of registration there are additional reasons why the design ought not to have been registered at the time of registration it was a corresponding design to an artistic work in which copyright subsisted, and the registered design rights have expired pursuant to section 22(1) of the Registered Designs Act (Cap 266) For the definition of “artistic work”, see section 7(1) of the Copyright Act (Cap 63). In High Court proceedings concerning the Singapore government’s use of a registered design, the government may likewise seek revocation of a registered design or, alternatively, put the validity of the registration in issue. It is also possible to apply...

Read More Right Arrow