Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“While we began looking at LexisNexis products primarily for cost saving, it quickly became more about customer service, ease of onboarding, ongoing training and breadth of resources available.”

Co-Op

Access all documents on Charitable appeal

Charitable appeal meaning

What does Charitable appeal mean?
In practice, a charitable appeal is any invitation to the public to donate money or other property, made on the basis that all or part of the proceeds will be applied for charitable, benevolent or philanthropic purposes. In England and Wales this wording appears in the statutory fundraising regime (Charities Act 1992, read with the consolidated Charities Act 2011) and underpins rules on professional fund-raisers and commercial participators, solicitation statements, and regulation of public charitable collections. In Scotland, similar concepts govern public charitable collections and fundraising under the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 and civic government licensing, overseen by OSCR and the Scottish Fundraising Adjudication Panel. In Northern Ireland, comparable rules apply under the Charities Act (Northern Ireland) 2008 and local licensing, overseen by the Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. In Ireland, the term is descriptive rather than defined in legislation; fundraising is regulated by the Charities Act 2009 and permits for street or house-to-house collections under the 1962 Act. In all jurisdictions, representing that donations will be used for charitable purposes brings the appeal within charity and consumer protection regulation, requiring transparency about beneficiaries, costs and remuneration, appropriate authorisation/permits, and compliance with advertising and fundraising standards.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Charitable appeal

CHECKLISTS
Charitable public appeals: practitioner checklist for planning, governance, compliance and record-keeping covering objects, targets, third-party fundraisers, advertising codes, data protection, collections, accounting and ongoing oversight

When starting a charitable public appeal, there is scant, if any, certainty that it will be successful. Accordingly, it is sensible to outline the key matters to be handled at the outset. This checklist aids the practitioner in explaining clearly those potential issues, or it can be passed to the promoters of the appeal to help keep these points front of mind...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Charitable appeal

NEWS
CFAs signed at community venue not an ‘excursion’: 2008 Regulations inapplicable; costs recoverable—Kupeli v Atlasjet (Court of Appeal)

What are the practical implications of this case? Where the 2008 Regulations bite, not giving written notification of the cancellation right may stop solicitors recovering their fees from clients and block a winning party from obtaining costs from the opponent. It is a criminal offence as well. The 2008 Regulations cover any CFA concluded by solicitors and clients at the client’s home or workplace. If the CFA was agreed somewhere else away from the solicitor’s offices, the Court of Appeal held that one must assess the particular setting and the purpose of the meeting to decide whether the 2008 Regulations are engaged. The 2008 Regulations have no application to agreements made on or after 13 June 2014, when the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 took effect. The Court of Appeal did not express a view on how matters would fall under the present regime. What was this case about? A charitable organisation called the Cemevi, serving the Turkish Cypriot community in London,...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Private client briefing: probate service delays, death certification reforms, OPG gifts, Court of Protection, tax/HMRC, digital assets Bill, pensions, HMLR, insolvency and international cases - 19 September 2024

In this issue: Probate Powers of attorney and advance decisions Court of Protection Spouses, civil partners and cohabitants UK taxes for Private Client HMRC Manuals updates Budgets and Finance Bills Insolvency—Private Client Digital assets and cryptoassets Pensions, insurance and tax efficient investments International Question of the week Additional Private Client updates this week Daily and weekly news alerts LexTalk®Private Client: a Lexis+® community New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Latest Q&As Useful information Probate Law Society welcomes shorter probate times but calls for further progress The Law Society of England and Wales has responded to HMCTS’s latest monthly management information on probate, noting average processing times fell to 9.3 weeks in July 2024, down from 14 weeks in the same month last year. The Society welcomes HMCTS’s engagement with the probate professional user group and the adoption of recommendations it...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Collective enfranchisement after lease extensions: UT confirms LRHUDA 1993 netting-off leaves freeholder with nil premium; compensation belongs at first stage (England and Wales)

Original news Trustees of the Alice Ellen Cooper-Dean Charitable Foundation v Greensleeves Owners Limited [2015] UKUT 0320 (LC). The UT affirmed the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) decision that a ‘two-stage’ enfranchisement resulted in no payment being due to the freeholder. What were the facts? The position can be broken down into three stages. Stage one The property was split into eight residential flats. Each flat lease provided for an initial ground rent of £300, with a review scheduled for late 2015. At the same time, a headlease was granted to a third party management company unconnected with the landlord. Under that headlease, the freeholder’s initial ground rent was £2,400, also subject to review in late 2015. Stage two In 2011, six of the flat tenants sought and obtained lease extensions under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993). As a consequence, the ground rent payable to the management company under each of those six leases was reduced from £300...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Charitable appeal

PRACTICE NOTES
Lehtimäki v Cooper (CIFF): Supreme Court on court-directed member votes, members’ fiduciary duties and conflicts in charitable companies

ARCHIVED: This key charity litigation case is archived and is not being maintained. The Supreme Court matter of Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v Attorney General illustrates how a substantial philanthropic trust can become entangled in matrimonial disputes and engage a range of charity litigation issues. Key facts The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) (CIFF) was a charity and a company limited by guarantee, incorporated and registered in 2002 by a husband (H) and his then wife (W). H and W acted as trustees of the charity and were also members of the company. The company’s only other member was Dr Marko Lehtimäki. After the breakdown of their marriage, H and C agreed that W would resign as a member and trustee of CIFF. In return, CIFF would provide a grant of $360m to a new charity founded by W. First instance judgment and appeal A company cannot make a payment for loss of office to a director (as contemplated by the agreement) unless it is...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Charitable public appeals: trust creation, failure and surplus, donor identification and cy-près schemes—law and Charity Commission guidance (England and Wales)

Charitable appeals Appeals for charity are commonplace, yet it is often overlooked that when members of the public contribute to an appeal for a purpose that is charitable in law, a trust for that purpose arises automatically by operation of law. This remains true even where the written terms are remarkably brief, eg ‘Save the Rembrandt for the Nation!’ or ‘Little Snoring Village Hall Roof Appeal’, or where there is no written notice at all but only an oral statement such as ‘A retiring collection will be made for Cancer Research’. The act of giving for a charitable purpose places those who receive the funds under a fiduciary obligation to apply them to that purpose, and to no other. Put another way, the recipients hold the money as charitable trustees. The nature of the purposes and appeals, the intended audience, and the amount sought (and in fact raised) vary widely. Initiatives may range from a modest local endeavour to a national campaign, and the totals collected may extend from...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Disaster funds and appeals: charitable versus non-charitable structures, trustee responsibilities, tax treatment and fundraising regulation

Advances in worldwide communications and mass media have produced concerted campaigns, for example through the Disaster Emergencies Committee (DEC), to collect funds for people affected by natural and man-made catastrophes. The monies gathered are, for the most part, channelled via established charities that possess the infrastructure, contacts and expertise needed to deploy them well. The charities’ own aims, typically focused on relieving (and preventing) poverty and illness, are ordinarily sufficiently wide to include supplying the basic essentials for survival—such as rescue, food, medical care and shelter—that victims may need. A further development has emerged among international animal welfare organisations, able to draw on their existing resources for this purpose, to solicit donations to save and care for pets and wildlife caught up in a disaster whose needs might otherwise receive lower priority. Calamities can also strike closer to home, and an appeal for contributions to assist those affected by a natural disaster in the UK, or by the consequences of human error or grave criminal acts such as riots or...

Read More Right Arrow